All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:54:41 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120612145441.400975347f06785d391d0f8f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1375 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:

arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c: In function 'pci_scan_one_pbm':
arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c:689:21: error: 'struct pci_pbm_info' has no member named 'pci_last_busn'

Caused by commit 2c7f691b032b ("sparc/PCI: register busn_res for root buses").

I have added the following patch for today:

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:48:39 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] sparc/PCI: fix typo

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
index 74e4bf3..4f92a9a 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 	pci_add_resource_offset(&resources, &pbm->mem_space,
 				pbm->mem_space.start);
 	pbm->busn.start = pbm->pci_first_busno;
-	pbm->busn.end	= pbm->pci_last_busn;
+	pbm->busn.end	= pbm->pci_last_busno;
 	pbm->busn.flags	= IORESOURCE_BUS;
 	pci_add_resource(&resources, &pbm->busn);
 	bus = pci_create_root_bus(parent, pbm->pci_first_busno, pbm->pci_ops,
-- 
1.7.10.280.gaa39

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 04:54:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120612145441.400975347f06785d391d0f8f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim5dYNmTMJo-Wa3LYCTi4vxPGMNeQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1375 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:

arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c: In function 'pci_scan_one_pbm':
arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c:689:21: error: 'struct pci_pbm_info' has no member named 'pci_last_busn'

Caused by commit 2c7f691b032b ("sparc/PCI: register busn_res for root buses").

I have added the following patch for today:

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:48:39 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] sparc/PCI: fix typo

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
index 74e4bf3..4f92a9a 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 	pci_add_resource_offset(&resources, &pbm->mem_space,
 				pbm->mem_space.start);
 	pbm->busn.start = pbm->pci_first_busno;
-	pbm->busn.end	= pbm->pci_last_busn;
+	pbm->busn.end	= pbm->pci_last_busno;
 	pbm->busn.flags	= IORESOURCE_BUS;
 	pci_add_resource(&resources, &pbm->busn);
 	bus = pci_create_root_bus(parent, pbm->pci_first_busno, pbm->pci_ops,
-- 
1.7.10.280.gaa39

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2012-06-12  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-12  4:54 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2012-06-12  4:54 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-12 15:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-12 15:31   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-12 15:31   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-13  0:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-13  0:50     ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-13 23:20     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-13 23:20       ` Bjorn Helgaas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-11-30  3:46 linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-30  3:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-22  6:22 linux-next: build failure after merge of the audit tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-22  6:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-22 15:56 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-22 15:56   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-22 16:32 ` Eric Paris
2014-04-22 16:32   ` Eric Paris
2014-04-22 21:27   ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-22 21:27     ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-11  7:34 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-11  7:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-11 18:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-11 18:22   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-11 23:23 ` Len Brown
2013-02-11 23:23   ` Len Brown
2013-02-12 17:35   ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 17:35     ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 18:01     ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)) Len Brown
2013-02-12 18:01       ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree r Len Brown
2013-02-12 18:03       ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? Len Brown
2013-02-12 18:03         ` Len Brown
2013-02-12 19:36         ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 19:36           ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 19:42       ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)) Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 19:42         ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tr Sam Ravnborg
2011-12-07  6:05 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-07 15:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-12-07 15:25   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-12-07 17:13     ` Jesse Barnes
2011-12-07 20:24   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-08 19:01     ` Tony Luck
2011-12-09  3:53       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-12-09 20:02         ` Luck, Tony
2011-12-12 20:53           ` Jesse Barnes
2011-06-09  7:27 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging related) Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-09 18:41 ` Greg KH
2011-06-09 19:22   ` Greg KH
2011-06-10  6:05     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-10  6:09       ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-10 22:34         ` Greg KH
2011-06-15  4:21           ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-16 19:14             ` Greg KH
2011-06-23  0:35               ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-23 21:51                 ` Greg KH
2011-06-24  0:00                   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-27 21:45                     ` Greg KH
2011-06-28  0:16                       ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-15 12:05       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-15 12:05         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-15 15:47         ` Greg KH
2011-06-15 15:47           ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging Greg KH
2011-06-15 14:35       ` [PATCH] arch/tile: remove useless set_fixmap_nocache() macro Chris Metcalf
2011-06-15 14:35       ` Chris Metcalf
2011-06-15 14:35         ` Chris Metcalf
2011-06-15 14:35         ` Chris Metcalf
2011-06-15 14:35         ` Chris Metcalf
2011-06-09 19:52   ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging related) Henry Ptasinski
2011-06-09 20:19     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120612145441.400975347f06785d391d0f8f@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.