From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:31:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110711093124.GA3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110711025344.GA27497@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53:44AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> The biggest issue I ran into was that as the clocks are all registered
> by name with the API if you've got two instances of the same off-SoC
> device in the system you'll not be able to disambiguate between the
> clocks it provides.
Sigh. That sounds like yet more trash. Obviously whoever thought
up that doesn't actually understand clks.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>,
Grant Likely <grant@secretlab.ca>,
patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:31:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110711093124.GA3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110711025344.GA27497@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53:44AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> The biggest issue I ran into was that as the clocks are all registered
> by name with the API if you've got two instances of the same off-SoC
> device in the system you'll not be able to disambiguate between the
> clocks it provides.
Sigh. That sounds like yet more trash. Obviously whoever thought
up that doesn't actually understand clks.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:31:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110711093124.GA3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110711025344.GA27497@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53:44AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> The biggest issue I ran into was that as the clocks are all registered
> by name with the API if you've got two instances of the same off-SoC
> device in the system you'll not be able to disambiguate between the
> clocks it provides.
Sigh. That sounds like yet more trash. Obviously whoever thought
up that doesn't actually understand clks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 2:53 [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` [PATCH 1/6] clk: Prototype and document clk_register() Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` [PATCH 2/6] clk: Provide a dummy clk_unregister() Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] clk: Constify struct clk_hw_ops Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` [PATCH 4/6] clk: Add Kconfig option to build all generic clk drivers Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: Support multiple instances of the same clock provider Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 9:34 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: Support multiple instances of the same clock Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-11 9:34 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: Support multiple instances of the same clock provider Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-11 9:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-11 10:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: Support multiple instances of the same clock Mark Brown
2011-07-11 10:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: Support multiple instances of the same clock provider Mark Brown
2011-07-11 10:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 11:11 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: Support multiple instances of the same clock Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-11 11:11 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: Support multiple instances of the same clock provider Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-11 11:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-11 11:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: Support multiple instances of the same clock Mark Brown
2011-07-11 11:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: Support multiple instances of the same clock provider Mark Brown
2011-07-11 11:41 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` [PATCH 6/6] clk: Add initial WM831x clock driver Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 2:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-15 2:53 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-15 2:53 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-15 2:53 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-15 5:05 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-15 5:05 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-15 5:05 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-15 5:14 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-07-15 5:14 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-07-15 5:14 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-07-15 2:53 ` [PATCH 1/6] clk: Prototype and document clk_register() Grant Likely
2011-07-15 2:53 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-15 2:53 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-11 3:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks Mark Brown
2011-07-11 3:57 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 3:57 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 4:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-11 4:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-11 4:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-11 4:56 ` Barry Song
2011-07-11 4:56 ` Barry Song
2011-07-11 4:56 ` Barry Song
2011-07-11 5:01 ` [uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for Mike Frysinger
2011-07-11 5:01 ` [uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks Mike Frysinger
2011-07-11 5:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-11 9:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-07-11 9:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-11 9:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-11 10:07 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-07-11 10:07 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-07-11 10:07 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-07-11 10:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-11 10:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-11 10:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-11 10:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-07-11 10:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-07-11 10:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-07-11 11:43 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 11:43 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-11 11:43 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110711093124.GA3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.