writeback tree status

writeback tree status

[Christoph Hellwig]

Hi Wu,

what is the state of the writeback updates for Linux 3.1?  There's
still a lot of changes in your fs-writeback branch, but not in the
next branch yet.  I know some are still under discussion, but it would
be good to get everything destined for Linux 3.1 into linux-next ASAP
so that it will get some testing.

writeback tree status

[Christoph Hellwig]

Hi Wu,

what is the state of the writeback updates for Linux 3.1?  There's
still a lot of changes in your fs-writeback branch, but not in the
next branch yet.  I know some are still under discussion, but it would
be good to get everything destined for Linux 3.1 into linux-next ASAP
so that it will get some testing.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: writeback tree status

[Wu Fengguang]

Hi Christoph,

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:42:07PM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Wu,
> 
> what is the state of the writeback updates for Linux 3.1?  There's
> still a lot of changes in your fs-writeback branch, but not in the
> next branch yet.  I know some are still under discussion, but it would
> be good to get everything destined for Linux 3.1 into linux-next ASAP
> so that it will get some testing.

Big sorry.. I just merged the fs-writeback patches into the branch for
linux-next. It seemed that I was a bit too nervous to push patches into
linux-next. I've been testing them locally, so far, so good. Hope the
linux-next push won't cause too much trouble for the wider testers.

Thanks,
Fengguang

Re: writeback tree status

[Wu Fengguang]

Hi Christoph,

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:42:07PM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Wu,
> 
> what is the state of the writeback updates for Linux 3.1?  There's
> still a lot of changes in your fs-writeback branch, but not in the
> next branch yet.  I know some are still under discussion, but it would
> be good to get everything destined for Linux 3.1 into linux-next ASAP
> so that it will get some testing.

Big sorry.. I just merged the fs-writeback patches into the branch for
linux-next. It seemed that I was a bit too nervous to push patches into
linux-next. I've been testing them locally, so far, so good. Hope the
linux-next push won't cause too much trouble for the wider testers.

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>