From: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" <manjugk@ti.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/7] decouple platform_device from omap_device
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:34:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110727140457.GA8558@manju-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311292338-11830-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com>
Kevin,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:52:10PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Here's a first whack, proof-of-concept on how we could start to
> decouple the platform_device from an omap_device.
>
> The main RFC is in the last patch, and everything leading up to it are
> misc. omap_device cleanups that make the last patch cleaner and
> clearer. It's really the last patch that does the decoupling.
>
> This will be necessary if we're going to decouple the platform_device
> creation from the omap_device/omap_hwmod creation etc. This patch
> leaves them both done in omap_device_build(), but shows that they can
> be decoupled.
Can you pls mention baseline used for these patches? I tried applying on
latest mainline, v3.0 and git://git.pwsan.com/linux-2.6 prcm-devel-3.1
It will not apply cleanly.
-M
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: manjugk@ti.com (G, Manjunath Kondaiah)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 0/7] decouple platform_device from omap_device
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:34:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110727140457.GA8558@manju-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311292338-11830-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com>
Kevin,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:52:10PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Here's a first whack, proof-of-concept on how we could start to
> decouple the platform_device from an omap_device.
>
> The main RFC is in the last patch, and everything leading up to it are
> misc. omap_device cleanups that make the last patch cleaner and
> clearer. It's really the last patch that does the decoupling.
>
> This will be necessary if we're going to decouple the platform_device
> creation from the omap_device/omap_hwmod creation etc. This patch
> leaves them both done in omap_device_build(), but shows that they can
> be decoupled.
Can you pls mention baseline used for these patches? I tried applying on
latest mainline, v3.0 and git://git.pwsan.com/linux-2.6 prcm-devel-3.1
It will not apply cleanly.
-M
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-27 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-21 23:52 [RFC/PATCH 0/7] decouple platform_device from omap_device Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [PATCH] OMAP: omap_device: replace _find_by_pdev() with to_omap_device() Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-22 8:53 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-22 8:53 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/7] OMAP: omap_device: replace debug/warning/error prints with dev_* macros Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/7] OMAP3: beagle: don't touch omap_device internals Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-22 8:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-22 8:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-28 5:53 ` Nishanth Menon
2011-07-28 5:53 ` Nishanth Menon
2011-07-28 10:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-28 10:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-28 12:57 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-07-28 12:57 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-07-28 12:59 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-28 12:59 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-28 13:31 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-07-28 13:31 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-07-29 13:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2011-07-29 13:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2011-07-29 14:05 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-29 14:05 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-29 23:07 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-07-29 23:07 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-08-01 8:52 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-01 8:52 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-28 8:36 ` Jean Pihet
2011-07-28 8:36 ` Jean Pihet
2011-07-28 8:40 ` Jean Pihet
2011-07-28 8:40 ` Jean Pihet
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/7] OMAP: McBSP: use existing macros for converting between devices Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-22 8:58 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-22 8:58 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-22 12:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-07-22 12:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-07-22 20:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-22 20:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/7] OMAP: omap_device: remove internal functions from omap_device.h Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/7] OMAP: omap_device: when building return platform_device instead of omap_device Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 6/7] OMAP: omap_device: device register functions now take platform_device pointer Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-22 6:16 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-22 6:16 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 7/7] WIP: HACK/RFC: omap_device: begin to decouple platform_device from omap_device Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-22 2:20 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-22 2:20 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-30 12:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-30 12:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-31 2:58 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-31 2:58 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-31 15:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-31 15:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-01 15:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-01 15:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-01 15:44 ` Grant Likely
2011-08-01 15:44 ` Grant Likely
2011-08-01 18:50 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-01 18:50 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-01 20:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-01 20:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-01 22:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-01 22:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-01 22:55 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-01 22:55 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-01 23:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-01 23:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-02 0:00 ` Grant Likely
2011-08-02 0:00 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-27 14:04 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah [this message]
2011-07-27 14:04 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/7] " G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-07-27 21:45 ` Hilman, Kevin
2011-07-27 21:45 ` Hilman, Kevin
2011-07-28 4:50 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-07-28 4:50 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-07-29 23:59 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-29 23:59 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110727140457.GA8558@manju-desktop \
--to=manjugk@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.