3.1-rc3-git6: Reported regressions 2.6.39 -> 3.0

3.1-rc3-git6: Reported regressions 2.6.39 -> 3.0

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some post-2.6.39 regressions introduced before
3.0, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.39 regressions, please let us know
either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know if any
of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2011-08-28       71       21          17
  2011-08-14       63       22          19
  2011-07-10       38       16          13
  2011-06-26       22       14          12
  2011-06-12        8        7           7


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41562
Subject		: acer-wmi: acer aspire 721 bluetooth control doesn't work with kernel 3.0.0
Submitter	: sbraz <hi.sbraz@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-08-22 18:32 (7 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41102
Subject		: BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
Submitter	: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Date		: 2011-08-13 22:29 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41092
Subject		: INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
Submitter	: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Date		: 2011-08-13 22:07 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442
Subject		: cpuinfo_max_freq lost 500MHz
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harri@afaics.de>
Date		: 2011-08-02 20:31 (27 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40282
Subject		: IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6
Submitter	: Stephan Seitz <stse+lkml@fsing.rootsland.net>
Date		: 2011-07-25 12:51 (35 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110725T141145.GA.2ae38.stse@fsing.rootsland.net>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131159880004908&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40262
Subject		: PROBLEM: I/O storm from hell on kernel 3.0.0 when touch swap (swapfile or partition)
Submitter	: g0re <g0re@null.net>
Date		: 2011-07-28 12:40 (32 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
Subject		: RCU stall in linux-3.0.0
Submitter	: Philip Armstrong <phil@kantaka.co.uk>
Date		: 2011-07-25 21:44 (35 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40072
Subject		: suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400, unless iwlagn unloaded
Submitter	: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Date		: 2011-07-23 19:27 (37 days old)
Message-ID	: <201107232127.34255.toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131144928023465&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39922
Subject		: WIFI becomes EXTREMELY slow ( ath9k ) making the connection unusable
Submitter	: Lukasz Olszewski <lcpak@epoczta.pl>
Date		: 2011-07-24 09:20 (36 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39912
Subject		: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:766 tty_ldisc_reinit+0x7d/0x90()
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-07-19 11:33 (41 days old)
Message-ID	: <CAOMGZ=HS2EPkYD=5HfkSPpwPqHB5V3q0vaFmoZ8Hh+pMM9phrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131107522914558&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39832
Subject		: HDA ATI HDMI: no sound with 3.0 - 2.6.39.3 works
Submitter	: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
Date		: 2011-07-23 01:36 (37 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
Subject		: JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
Submitter	: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
Date		: 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
Subject		: Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
Submitter	: Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
Date		: 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39192
Subject		: firmware_install fails with parallel make
Submitter	: Ambroz Bizjak <ambrop7@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-07-12 09:35 (48 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
Subject		: Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
Submitter	: Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38622
Subject		: [radeon cayman regresion] artefacts on screen
Submitter	: Marek Hobler, &apos;neutrinus&apos; <kernellist@neutrinus.com>
Date		: 2011-07-01 09:35 (59 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38582
Subject		: T510 43495KG won't resume with 32bit installation
Submitter	: Marc Koschewski <marc@osknowledge.org>
Date		: 2011-06-30 22:39 (60 days old)


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41262
Subject		: Terracted T5 does no more work
Submitter	: Eric Valette <eric.valette@free.fr>
Date		: 2011-08-16 20:45 (13 days old)
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69382
		  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69392
		  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69402


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41232
Subject		: Channel switching on Hauppauge Nova-T stick fails randomly
Submitter	:  <q222@gmx.com>
Date		: 2011-08-16 11:33 (13 days old)
Patch		: http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/aeb2d456b746164a4bd19e53de0a6678ca63fcad
		  http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57
		  http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
Subject		: USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@tikei.de>
Date		: 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110722192722.GA9369@x61.home>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
Patch		: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39882
Subject		: Kernel oops when turning bluetooth mouse on
Submitter	: Lamarque V. Souza <lamarque@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-07-24 02:09 (36 days old)
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=70342


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.39 and 3.0, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36912

Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.

Thanks!

3.1-rc3-git6: Reported regressions 2.6.39 -> 3.0

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some post-2.6.39 regressions introduced before
3.0, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.39 regressions, please let us know
either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know if any
of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2011-08-28       71       21          17
  2011-08-14       63       22          19
  2011-07-10       38       16          13
  2011-06-26       22       14          12
  2011-06-12        8        7           7


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41562
Subject		: acer-wmi: acer aspire 721 bluetooth control doesn't work with kernel 3.0.0
Submitter	: sbraz <hi.sbraz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-22 18:32 (7 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41102
Subject		: BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
Submitter	: Paul Bolle <pebolle-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-13 22:29 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41092
Subject		: INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
Submitter	: Paul Bolle <pebolle-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-13 22:07 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442
Subject		: cpuinfo_max_freq lost 500MHz
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harri-z+8oq0O/ijmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-02 20:31 (27 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40282
Subject		: IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6
Submitter	: Stephan Seitz <stse+lkml-S0d6l+6kcjrOGKtSYHEJQ9HuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-25 12:51 (35 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110725T141145.GA.2ae38.stse-S0d6l+6kcjrOGKtSYHEJQ9HuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131159880004908&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40262
Subject		: PROBLEM: I/O storm from hell on kernel 3.0.0 when touch swap (swapfile or partition)
Submitter	: g0re <g0re-ifvz4xmYPRU@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-28 12:40 (32 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
Subject		: RCU stall in linux-3.0.0
Submitter	: Philip Armstrong <phil-awZZuG094qgqdlJmJB21zg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-25 21:44 (35 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40072
Subject		: suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400, unless iwlagn unloaded
Submitter	: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-23 19:27 (37 days old)
Message-ID	: <201107232127.34255.toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131144928023465&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39922
Subject		: WIFI becomes EXTREMELY slow ( ath9k ) making the connection unusable
Submitter	: Lukasz Olszewski <lcpak-tIkWECEXGi3VItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-24 09:20 (36 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39912
Subject		: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:766 tty_ldisc_reinit+0x7d/0x90()
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-19 11:33 (41 days old)
Message-ID	: <CAOMGZ=HS2EPkYD=5HfkSPpwPqHB5V3q0vaFmoZ8Hh+pMM9phrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131107522914558&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39832
Subject		: HDA ATI HDMI: no sound with 3.0 - 2.6.39.3 works
Submitter	: Andreas Steinmetz <ast-sy9/ueDX/ME@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-23 01:36 (37 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
Subject		: JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
Submitter	: Witold Baryluk <baryluk-W6Hso+/wx31C2Nf1M/Lcnw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
Subject		: Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
Submitter	: Jay Ren <yongjie.ren-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39192
Subject		: firmware_install fails with parallel make
Submitter	: Ambroz Bizjak <ambrop7-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-12 09:35 (48 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
Subject		: Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
Submitter	: Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38622
Subject		: [radeon cayman regresion] artefacts on screen
Submitter	: Marek Hobler, &apos;neutrinus&apos; <kernellist@neutrinus.com>
Date		: 2011-07-01 09:35 (59 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38582
Subject		: T510 43495KG won't resume with 32bit installation
Submitter	: Marc Koschewski <marc-e1Wt+8K1Ta8ZEwqihLH0+Q@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-06-30 22:39 (60 days old)


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41262
Subject		: Terracted T5 does no more work
Submitter	: Eric Valette <eric.valette-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-16 20:45 (13 days old)
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69382
		  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69392
		  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69402


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41232
Subject		: Channel switching on Hauppauge Nova-T stick fails randomly
Submitter	:  <q222-KK0ffGbhmjU@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-16 11:33 (13 days old)
Patch		: http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/aeb2d456b746164a4bd19e53de0a6678ca63fcad
		  http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57
		  http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
Subject		: USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-rAwCM5oiXHA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110722192722.GA9369-dW8JlKMZij8@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
Patch		: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39882
Subject		: Kernel oops when turning bluetooth mouse on
Submitter	: Lamarque V. Souza <lamarque-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-24 02:09 (36 days old)
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=70342


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.39 and 3.0, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36912

Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.

Thanks!

3.1-rc3-git6: Reported regressions 2.6.39 -> 3.0

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some post-2.6.39 regressions introduced before
3.0, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.39 regressions, please let us know
either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know if any
of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2011-08-28       71       21          17
  2011-08-14       63       22          19
  2011-07-10       38       16          13
  2011-06-26       22       14          12
  2011-06-12        8        7           7


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41562
Subject		: acer-wmi: acer aspire 721 bluetooth control doesn't work with kernel 3.0.0
Submitter	: sbraz <hi.sbraz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-22 18:32 (7 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41102
Subject		: BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
Submitter	: Paul Bolle <pebolle-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-13 22:29 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41092
Subject		: INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
Submitter	: Paul Bolle <pebolle-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-13 22:07 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442
Subject		: cpuinfo_max_freq lost 500MHz
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harri-z+8oq0O/ijmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-02 20:31 (27 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40282
Subject		: IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6
Submitter	: Stephan Seitz <stse+lkml-S0d6l+6kcjrOGKtSYHEJQ9HuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-25 12:51 (35 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110725T141145.GA.2ae38.stse-S0d6l+6kcjrOGKtSYHEJQ9HuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131159880004908&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40262
Subject		: PROBLEM: I/O storm from hell on kernel 3.0.0 when touch swap (swapfile or partition)
Submitter	: g0re <g0re-ifvz4xmYPRU@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-28 12:40 (32 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
Subject		: RCU stall in linux-3.0.0
Submitter	: Philip Armstrong <phil-awZZuG094qgqdlJmJB21zg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-25 21:44 (35 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40072
Subject		: suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400, unless iwlagn unloaded
Submitter	: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-23 19:27 (37 days old)
Message-ID	: <201107232127.34255.toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131144928023465&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39922
Subject		: WIFI becomes EXTREMELY slow ( ath9k ) making the connection unusable
Submitter	: Lukasz Olszewski <lcpak-tIkWECEXGi3VItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-24 09:20 (36 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39912
Subject		: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:766 tty_ldisc_reinit+0x7d/0x90()
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-19 11:33 (41 days old)
Message-ID	: <CAOMGZ=HS2EPkYD=5HfkSPpwPqHB5V3q0vaFmoZ8Hh+pMM9phrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131107522914558&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39832
Subject		: HDA ATI HDMI: no sound with 3.0 - 2.6.39.3 works
Submitter	: Andreas Steinmetz <ast-sy9/ueDX/ME@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-23 01:36 (37 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
Subject		: JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
Submitter	: Witold Baryluk <baryluk-W6Hso+/wx31C2Nf1M/Lcnw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
Subject		: Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
Submitter	: Jay Ren <yongjie.ren-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39192
Subject		: firmware_install fails with parallel make
Submitter	: Ambroz Bizjak <ambrop7-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-12 09:35 (48 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
Subject		: Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
Submitter	: Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38622
Subject		: [radeon cayman regresion] artefacts on screen
Submitter	: Marek Hobler, &apos;neutrinus&apos; <kernellist@neutrinus.com>
Date		: 2011-07-01 09:35 (59 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38582
Subject		: T510 43495KG won't resume with 32bit installation
Submitter	: Marc Koschewski <marc-e1Wt+8K1Ta8ZEwqihLH0+Q@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-06-30 22:39 (60 days old)


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41262
Subject		: Terracted T5 does no more work
Submitter	: Eric Valette <eric.valette-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-16 20:45 (13 days old)
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69382
		  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69392
		  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69402


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41232
Subject		: Channel switching on Hauppauge Nova-T stick fails randomly
Submitter	:  <q222-KK0ffGbhmjU@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-16 11:33 (13 days old)
Patch		: http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/aeb2d456b746164a4bd19e53de0a6678ca63fcad
		  http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57
		  http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
Subject		: USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-rAwCM5oiXHA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110722192722.GA9369-dW8JlKMZij8@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
Patch		: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39882
Subject		: Kernel oops when turning bluetooth mouse on
Submitter	: Lamarque V. Souza <lamarque-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-24 02:09 (36 days old)
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=70342


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.39 and 3.0, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36912

Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.

Thanks!

[Bug #38582] T510 43495KG won't resume with 32bit installation

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38582
Subject		: T510 43495KG won't resume with 32bit installation
Submitter	: Marc Koschewski <marc@osknowledge.org>
Date		: 2011-06-30 22:39 (60 days old)

[Bug #38582] T510 43495KG won't resume with 32bit installation

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38582
Subject		: T510 43495KG won't resume with 32bit installation
Submitter	: Marc Koschewski <marc-e1Wt+8K1Ta8ZEwqihLH0+Q@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-06-30 22:39 (60 days old)

[Bug #38622] [radeon cayman regresion] artefacts on screen

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38622
Subject		: [radeon cayman regresion] artefacts on screen
Submitter	: Marek Hobler, &apos;neutrinus&apos; <kernellist@neutrinus.com>
Date		: 2011-07-01 09:35 (59 days old)

[Bug #39192] firmware_install fails with parallel make

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39192
Subject		: firmware_install fails with parallel make
Submitter	: Ambroz Bizjak <ambrop7@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-07-12 09:35 (48 days old)

[Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
Subject		: Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
Submitter	: Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
Date		: 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)

[Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
Subject		: Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
Submitter	: Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618

[Bug #38622] [radeon cayman regresion] artefacts on screen

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38622
Subject		: [radeon cayman regresion] artefacts on screen
Submitter	: Marek Hobler, &apos;neutrinus&apos; <kernellist-X/h6sc6Dz0uakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-01 09:35 (59 days old)

[Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
Subject		: Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
Submitter	: Jay Ren <yongjie.ren-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)

[Bug #39192] firmware_install fails with parallel make

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39192
Subject		: firmware_install fails with parallel make
Submitter	: Ambroz Bizjak <ambrop7-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-12 09:35 (48 days old)

[Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
Subject		: Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
Submitter	: Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618

[Bug #39732] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
Subject		: JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
Submitter	: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
Date		: 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)

[Bug #39882] Kernel oops when turning bluetooth mouse on

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39882
Subject		: Kernel oops when turning bluetooth mouse on
Submitter	: Lamarque V. Souza <lamarque@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-07-24 02:09 (36 days old)
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=70342

[Bug #39832] HDA ATI HDMI: no sound with 3.0 - 2.6.39.3 works

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39832
Subject		: HDA ATI HDMI: no sound with 3.0 - 2.6.39.3 works
Submitter	: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
Date		: 2011-07-23 01:36 (37 days old)

[Bug #39732] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
Subject		: JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
Submitter	: Witold Baryluk <baryluk-W6Hso+/wx31C2Nf1M/Lcnw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)

[Bug #39832] HDA ATI HDMI: no sound with 3.0 - 2.6.39.3 works

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39832
Subject		: HDA ATI HDMI: no sound with 3.0 - 2.6.39.3 works
Submitter	: Andreas Steinmetz <ast-sy9/ueDX/ME@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-23 01:36 (37 days old)

[Bug #40072] suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400, unless iwlagn unloaded

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40072
Subject		: suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400, unless iwlagn unloaded
Submitter	: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Date		: 2011-07-23 19:27 (37 days old)
Message-ID	: <201107232127.34255.toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131144928023465&w=2

[Bug #39912] WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:766 tty_ldisc_reinit+0x7d/0x90()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39912
Subject		: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:766 tty_ldisc_reinit+0x7d/0x90()
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-07-19 11:33 (41 days old)
Message-ID	: <CAOMGZ=HS2EPkYD=5HfkSPpwPqHB5V3q0vaFmoZ8Hh+pMM9phrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131107522914558&w=2

[Bug #40062] USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
Subject		: USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@tikei.de>
Date		: 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110722192722.GA9369@x61.home>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
Patch		: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174

[Bug #39922] WIFI becomes EXTREMELY slow ( ath9k ) making the connection unusable

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39922
Subject		: WIFI becomes EXTREMELY slow ( ath9k ) making the connection unusable
Submitter	: Lukasz Olszewski <lcpak@epoczta.pl>
Date		: 2011-07-24 09:20 (36 days old)

[Bug #40072] suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400, unless iwlagn unloaded

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40072
Subject		: suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400, unless iwlagn unloaded
Submitter	: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-23 19:27 (37 days old)
Message-ID	: <201107232127.34255.toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131144928023465&w=2

[Bug #40062] USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
Subject		: USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-rAwCM5oiXHA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110722192722.GA9369-dW8JlKMZij8@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
Patch		: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174

[Bug #39922] WIFI becomes EXTREMELY slow ( ath9k ) making the connection unusable

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39922
Subject		: WIFI becomes EXTREMELY slow ( ath9k ) making the connection unusable
Submitter	: Lukasz Olszewski <lcpak-tIkWECEXGi3VItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-24 09:20 (36 days old)

[Bug #40092] RCU stall in linux-3.0.0

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
Subject		: RCU stall in linux-3.0.0
Submitter	: Philip Armstrong <phil@kantaka.co.uk>
Date		: 2011-07-25 21:44 (35 days old)

[Bug #40262] PROBLEM: I/O storm from hell on kernel 3.0.0 when touch swap (swapfile or partition)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40262
Subject		: PROBLEM: I/O storm from hell on kernel 3.0.0 when touch swap (swapfile or partition)
Submitter	: g0re <g0re@null.net>
Date		: 2011-07-28 12:40 (32 days old)

[Bug #40092] RCU stall in linux-3.0.0

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
Subject		: RCU stall in linux-3.0.0
Submitter	: Philip Armstrong <phil-awZZuG094qgqdlJmJB21zg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-25 21:44 (35 days old)

[Bug #40262] PROBLEM: I/O storm from hell on kernel 3.0.0 when touch swap (swapfile or partition)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40262
Subject		: PROBLEM: I/O storm from hell on kernel 3.0.0 when touch swap (swapfile or partition)
Submitter	: g0re <g0re-ifvz4xmYPRU@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-28 12:40 (32 days old)

[Bug #40282] IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40282
Subject		: IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6
Submitter	: Stephan Seitz <stse+lkml@fsing.rootsland.net>
Date		: 2011-07-25 12:51 (35 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110725T141145.GA.2ae38.stse@fsing.rootsland.net>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131159880004908&w=2

[Bug #41102] BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41102
Subject		: BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
Submitter	: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Date		: 2011-08-13 22:29 (16 days old)

[Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41092
Subject		: INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
Submitter	: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Date		: 2011-08-13 22:07 (16 days old)

[Bug #40442] cpuinfo_max_freq lost 500MHz

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442
Subject		: cpuinfo_max_freq lost 500MHz
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harri@afaics.de>
Date		: 2011-08-02 20:31 (27 days old)

[Bug #40282] IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40282
Subject		: IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6
Submitter	: Stephan Seitz <stse+lkml-S0d6l+6kcjrOGKtSYHEJQ9HuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-07-25 12:51 (35 days old)
Message-ID	: <20110725T141145.GA.2ae38.stse-S0d6l+6kcjrOGKtSYHEJQ9HuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131159880004908&w=2

[Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41092
Subject		: INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
Submitter	: Paul Bolle <pebolle-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-13 22:07 (16 days old)

[Bug #40442] cpuinfo_max_freq lost 500MHz

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442
Subject		: cpuinfo_max_freq lost 500MHz
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harri-z+8oq0O/ijmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-02 20:31 (27 days old)

[Bug #41262] Terracted T5 does no more work

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41262
Subject		: Terracted T5 does no more work
Submitter	: Eric Valette <eric.valette@free.fr>
Date		: 2011-08-16 20:45 (13 days old)
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69382
		  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69392
		  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69402

[Bug #41232] Channel switching on Hauppauge Nova-T stick fails randomly

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41232
Subject		: Channel switching on Hauppauge Nova-T stick fails randomly
Submitter	:  <q222@gmx.com>
Date		: 2011-08-16 11:33 (13 days old)
Patch		: http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/aeb2d456b746164a4bd19e53de0a6678ca63fcad
		  http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57
		  http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57

[Bug #41232] Channel switching on Hauppauge Nova-T stick fails randomly

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41232
Subject		: Channel switching on Hauppauge Nova-T stick fails randomly
Submitter	:  <q222-KK0ffGbhmjU@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-16 11:33 (13 days old)
Patch		: http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/aeb2d456b746164a4bd19e53de0a6678ca63fcad
		  http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57
		  http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57

[Bug #41262] Terracted T5 does no more work

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41262
Subject		: Terracted T5 does no more work
Submitter	: Eric Valette <eric.valette-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-16 20:45 (13 days old)
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69382
		  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69392
		  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69402

[Bug #41562] acer-wmi: acer aspire 721 bluetooth control doesn't work with kernel 3.0.0

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41562
Subject		: acer-wmi: acer aspire 721 bluetooth control doesn't work with kernel 3.0.0
Submitter	: sbraz <hi.sbraz@gmail.com>
Date		: 2011-08-22 18:32 (7 days old)

[Bug #41562] acer-wmi: acer aspire 721 bluetooth control doesn't work with kernel 3.0.0

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41562
Subject		: acer-wmi: acer aspire 721 bluetooth control doesn't work with kernel 3.0.0
Submitter	: sbraz <hi.sbraz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2011-08-22 18:32 (7 days old)

Re: [Bug #40062] USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7

[Tino Keitel]

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 21:01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
> Subject		: USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
> Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@tikei.de>
> Date		: 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
> Message-ID	: <20110722192722.GA9369@x61.home>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
> Patch		: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174

The patch was not added to git master or 3.0.y yet.

Regards,
Tino

Re: [Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert

[Chris Ball]

Hi Rafael,

On Sun, Aug 28 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
> Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition
> writing and io errors on insert
> Submitter	: Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter@googlemail.com>
> Date		: 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit:
> http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618

Yes, still present.

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child

Re: [Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert

[Chris Ball]

Hi Rafael,

On Sun, Aug 28 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
> Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition
> writing and io errors on insert
> Submitter	: Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit:
> http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618

Yes, still present.

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child

Re: [Bug #40062] USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, August 28, 2011, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 21:01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
> > Subject		: USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
> > Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@tikei.de>
> > Date		: 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <20110722192722.GA9369@x61.home>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
> > Patch		: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174
> 
> The patch was not added to git master or 3.0.y yet.

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #40062] USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, August 28, 2011, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 21:01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
> > Subject		: USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
> > Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-rAwCM5oiXHA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <20110722192722.GA9369-dW8JlKMZij8@public.gmane.org>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
> > Patch		: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174
> 
> The patch was not added to git master or 3.0.y yet.

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, August 28, 2011, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On Sun, Aug 28 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
> > Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition
> > writing and io errors on insert
> > Submitter	: Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter@googlemail.com>
> > Date		: 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit:
> > http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618
> 
> Yes, still present.

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, August 28, 2011, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On Sun, Aug 28 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
> > Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition
> > writing and io errors on insert
> > Submitter	: Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit:
> > http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618
> 
> Yes, still present.

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #41262] Terracted T5 does no more work

[Eric Valette]

On 28/08/2011 21:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).

I think this bug and bug 41232 in the regression list are identical: 
they both use the same dibcom chipsets. At least proposed patches are 
identical.

Eyes Tv diversity needs this patches too.

--eric

RE: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Ren, Yongjie]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1345 bytes --]

I've verified this bug in Linus' tree 3.1.0-rc4. It got fixed, so I closed the bug.
The commit I tried is below.
commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sun Aug 28 21:16:01 2011 -0700

Best Regards,
     Yongjie Ren  (Jay)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@sisk.pl]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 3:01 AM
> To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
> Cc: Kernel Testers List; Maciej Rutecki; Florian Mickler; Avi Kivity; Ren, Yongjie;
> Marcelo Tosatti; Stefan Hajnoczi
> Subject: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> 
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
> Subject		: Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> Submitter	: Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
> Date		: 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)
> 

ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥

RE: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Ren, Yongjie]

I've verified this bug in Linus' tree 3.1.0-rc4. It got fixed, so I closed the bug.
The commit I tried is below.
commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sun Aug 28 21:16:01 2011 -0700

Best Regards,
     Yongjie Ren  (Jay)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@sisk.pl]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 3:01 AM
> To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
> Cc: Kernel Testers List; Maciej Rutecki; Florian Mickler; Avi Kivity; Ren, Yongjie;
> Marcelo Tosatti; Stefan Hajnoczi
> Subject: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> 
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
> Subject		: Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> Submitter	: Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
> Date		: 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)
> 

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, August 29, 2011, Ren, Yongjie wrote:
> I've verified this bug in Linus' tree 3.1.0-rc4. It got fixed, so I closed the bug.
> The commit I tried is below.
> commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Date:   Sun Aug 28 21:16:01 2011 -0700

Thanks, closing.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, August 29, 2011, Ren, Yongjie wrote:
> I've verified this bug in Linus' tree 3.1.0-rc4. It got fixed, so I closed the bug.
> The commit I tried is below.
> commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
> Date:   Sun Aug 28 21:16:01 2011 -0700

Thanks, closing.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)

[Paul Bolle]

On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).

>From comment #2:
> [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a one
> time goof - would never have showed up in the logs [...].

At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
regression.


Paul Bolle

Re: [Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)

[Paul Bolle]

On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).

From comment #2:
> [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a one
> time goof - would never have showed up in the logs [...].

At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
regression.


Paul Bolle

Re: [Bug #41102] BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten

[Paul Bolle]

On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).

>From comment #2:
> [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a
> one time goof - would never have showed up in the logs unless I manually booted
> with "slub_debug" on the command line. And I can't remember booting with
> "slub_debug".

At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
regression.


Paul Bolle

Re: [Bug #41102] BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten

[Paul Bolle]

On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).

From comment #2:
> [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a
> one time goof - would never have showed up in the logs unless I manually booted
> with "slub_debug" on the command line. And I can't remember booting with
> "slub_debug".

At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
regression.


Paul Bolle

Re: [Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, August 30, 2011, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> 
> From comment #2:
> > [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> > triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a one
> > time goof - would never have showed up in the logs [...].
> 
> At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
> regression.

OK, I'll drop it from the list, then (sorry for the misplaced message BTW).

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, August 30, 2011, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> 
> From comment #2:
> > [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> > triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a one
> > time goof - would never have showed up in the logs [...].
> 
> At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
> regression.

OK, I'll drop it from the list, then (sorry for the misplaced message BTW).

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #41102] BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, August 30, 2011, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> 
> From comment #2:
> > [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> > triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a
> > one time goof - would never have showed up in the logs unless I manually booted
> > with "slub_debug" on the command line. And I can't remember booting with
> > "slub_debug".
> 
> At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
> regression.

OK, dropped from the list of recent regressions.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #41102] BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, August 30, 2011, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> 
> From comment #2:
> > [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> > triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a
> > one time goof - would never have showed up in the logs unless I manually booted
> > with "slub_debug" on the command line. And I can't remember booting with
> > "slub_debug".
> 
> At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
> regression.

OK, dropped from the list of recent regressions.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #39732] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.

[Witold Baryluk]

On 08-28 21:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
> Subject		: JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> Submitter	: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
> Date		: 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)
> 

Hi,

This bug still exists in 3.1.0 and 3.2.0-rc5

I spoted it again few days ago, because I moved from me laptop with 2GB
to temporary desktop with 256MB of RAM, and not it
triggers like a mad.

So my initial suspicious that it only shows up on big memory
presure was correct.


It is just like this 
# dmesg | grep dirty
[122647.953872] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1019852). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122647.954598] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043195). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122647.955213] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043197). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122689.978864] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 498559). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122705.485461] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68282). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122705.486046] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68284). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122705.496916] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68365). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122705.612423] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 69218). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122706.531297] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 833896). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122720.863807] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 914979). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.046789] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 890090). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.088280] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 916474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.176979] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 928182). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.177593] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 927783). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.371654] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 920655). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.543676] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 967035). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122728.396687] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122736.283876] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 713478). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122743.576350] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 745551). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122743.889259] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 828117). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122752.077022] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905082). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122752.125005] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905294). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122752.784390] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1030306). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122752.785053] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1031593). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
#

dm-4 is ext4 partition mounted at /var
dm-4 is on LVM on luksCrypt on ATA drive.

I'm using currently stock Debian testing kernel:
$ uname -a
Linux sredniczarny 3.1.0-1-686-pae #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.1.0-1-686-pae (Debian 3.1.4-1) (waldi@debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-4) ) #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011
$

32-bit intel compatible cpu


Regards,
Witek

-- 
Witold Baryluk

Re: [Bug #39732] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.

[Jan Kara]

  Hi,

On Tue 13-12-11 05:11:44, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> On 08-28 21:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
> > Subject		: JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > Submitter	: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
> > Date		: 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)
> 
> This bug still exists in 3.1.0 and 3.2.0-rc5
> 
> I spoted it again few days ago, because I moved from me laptop with 2GB
> to temporary desktop with 256MB of RAM, and not it
> triggers like a mad.
> 
> So my initial suspicious that it only shows up on big memory
> presure was correct.
> 
> 
> It is just like this 
> # dmesg | grep dirty
> [122647.953872] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1019852). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122647.954598] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043195). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122647.955213] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043197). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122689.978864] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 498559). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122705.485461] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68282). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122705.486046] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68284). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122705.496916] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68365). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122705.612423] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 69218). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122706.531297] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 833896). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122720.863807] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 914979). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.046789] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 890090). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.088280] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 916474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.176979] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 928182). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.177593] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 927783). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.371654] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 920655). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.543676] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 967035). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122728.396687] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122736.283876] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 713478). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122743.576350] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 745551). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122743.889259] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 828117). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122752.077022] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905082). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122752.125005] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905294). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122752.784390] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1030306). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122752.785053] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1031593). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> #
> 
> dm-4 is ext4 partition mounted at /var
> dm-4 is on LVM on luksCrypt on ATA drive.
> 
> I'm using currently stock Debian testing kernel:
> $ uname -a
> Linux sredniczarny 3.1.0-1-686-pae #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
> $ cat /proc/version
> Linux version 3.1.0-1-686-pae (Debian 3.1.4-1) (waldi@debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-4) ) #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011
> $
> 
> 32-bit intel compatible cpu
  Thanks for report. Actually I was able to reproduce these messages with
data=journal mode as well when running bash_shared_mapping test. The
culprit of the problem is that block_mkwrite() as used in
ext4_page_mkwrite() marks buffers dirty and JBD2 notices this before
we clear dirty bits later in ext4_page_mkwrite() (since JBD2 doesn't use
page lock for protection when inspecting buffers). So for data=journal mode
we'll probably have to reimplement what block_page_mkwrite() does in a
slightly different manner tweaked for the needs of data=journal mode.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [Bug #39732] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.

[Witold Baryluk]

On 12-13 18:35, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
> On Tue 13-12-11 05:11:44, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> > On 08-28 21:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
> > > Subject		: JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > > Submitter	: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
> > > Date		: 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)
> > 
> > This bug still exists in 3.1.0 and 3.2.0-rc5
> > 
> > I spoted it again few days ago, because I moved from me laptop with 2GB
> > to temporary desktop with 256MB of RAM, and not it
> > triggers like a mad.
> > 
> > So my initial suspicious that it only shows up on big memory
> > presure was correct.
> > 
> > 
> > It is just like this 
> > # dmesg | grep dirty
> > [122647.953872] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1019852). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122647.954598] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043195). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122647.955213] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043197). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122689.978864] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 498559). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122705.485461] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68282). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122705.486046] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68284). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122705.496916] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68365). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122705.612423] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 69218). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122706.531297] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 833896). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122720.863807] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 914979). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.046789] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 890090). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.088280] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 916474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.176979] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 928182). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.177593] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 927783). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.371654] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 920655). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.543676] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 967035). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122728.396687] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122736.283876] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 713478). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122743.576350] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 745551). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122743.889259] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 828117). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122752.077022] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905082). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122752.125005] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905294). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122752.784390] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1030306). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122752.785053] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1031593). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > #
> > 
> > dm-4 is ext4 partition mounted at /var
> > dm-4 is on LVM on luksCrypt on ATA drive.
> > 
> > I'm using currently stock Debian testing kernel:
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux sredniczarny 3.1.0-1-686-pae #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
> > $ cat /proc/version
> > Linux version 3.1.0-1-686-pae (Debian 3.1.4-1) (waldi@debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-4) ) #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011
> > $
> > 
> > 32-bit intel compatible cpu
>   Thanks for report. Actually I was able to reproduce these messages with
> data=journal mode as well when running bash_shared_mapping test. The
> culprit of the problem is that block_mkwrite() as used in
> ext4_page_mkwrite() marks buffers dirty and JBD2 notices this before
> we clear dirty bits later in ext4_page_mkwrite() (since JBD2 doesn't use
> page lock for protection when inspecting buffers). So for data=journal mode
> we'll probably have to reimplement what block_page_mkwrite() does in a
> slightly different manner tweaked for the needs of data=journal mode.
> 

Yes, I run data=journal, I am sorry I not mentioned it first!
(I think I did this in initial bug report, but to this day
bugzilla is not working :/ )

# grep /var /proc/mounts
/dev/mapper/sredniczarny-var /var ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,acl,commit=120,barrier=1,nodelalloc,data=journal 0 0
#

It is somehow important I think, for two reasons
1) I run on laptop, so risk of power loss is high
2) I use data=journal for having higher data integrity / reliability,
   and having it opossing effect (by not only not possibly providing
   this reliability, but also compromising metadata and filesystem structure
   integrity) is somehow not anyone would want (especially when using data=journal).

Regards,
Witek


-- 
Witold Baryluk

Re: [Bug #39732] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.

[Witold Baryluk]

On 12-13 18:35, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
> On Tue 13-12-11 05:11:44, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> > On 08-28 21:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
> > > Subject		: JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > > Submitter	: Witold Baryluk <baryluk-W6Hso+/wx31C2Nf1M/Lcnw@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date		: 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)
> > 
> > This bug still exists in 3.1.0 and 3.2.0-rc5
> > 
> > I spoted it again few days ago, because I moved from me laptop with 2GB
> > to temporary desktop with 256MB of RAM, and not it
> > triggers like a mad.
> > 
> > So my initial suspicious that it only shows up on big memory
> > presure was correct.
> > 
> > 
> > It is just like this 
> > # dmesg | grep dirty
> > [122647.953872] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1019852). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122647.954598] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043195). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122647.955213] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043197). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122689.978864] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 498559). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122705.485461] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68282). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122705.486046] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68284). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122705.496916] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68365). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122705.612423] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 69218). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122706.531297] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 833896). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122720.863807] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 914979). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.046789] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 890090). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.088280] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 916474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.176979] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 928182). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.177593] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 927783). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.371654] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 920655). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122721.543676] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 967035). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122728.396687] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122736.283876] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 713478). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122743.576350] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 745551). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122743.889259] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 828117). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122752.077022] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905082). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122752.125005] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905294). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122752.784390] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1030306). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > [122752.785053] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1031593). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > #
> > 
> > dm-4 is ext4 partition mounted at /var
> > dm-4 is on LVM on luksCrypt on ATA drive.
> > 
> > I'm using currently stock Debian testing kernel:
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux sredniczarny 3.1.0-1-686-pae #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
> > $ cat /proc/version
> > Linux version 3.1.0-1-686-pae (Debian 3.1.4-1) (waldi-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org) (gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-4) ) #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011
> > $
> > 
> > 32-bit intel compatible cpu
>   Thanks for report. Actually I was able to reproduce these messages with
> data=journal mode as well when running bash_shared_mapping test. The
> culprit of the problem is that block_mkwrite() as used in
> ext4_page_mkwrite() marks buffers dirty and JBD2 notices this before
> we clear dirty bits later in ext4_page_mkwrite() (since JBD2 doesn't use
> page lock for protection when inspecting buffers). So for data=journal mode
> we'll probably have to reimplement what block_page_mkwrite() does in a
> slightly different manner tweaked for the needs of data=journal mode.
> 

Yes, I run data=journal, I am sorry I not mentioned it first!
(I think I did this in initial bug report, but to this day
bugzilla is not working :/ )

# grep /var /proc/mounts
/dev/mapper/sredniczarny-var /var ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,acl,commit=120,barrier=1,nodelalloc,data=journal 0 0
#

It is somehow important I think, for two reasons
1) I run on laptop, so risk of power loss is high
2) I use data=journal for having higher data integrity / reliability,
   and having it opossing effect (by not only not possibly providing
   this reliability, but also compromising metadata and filesystem structure
   integrity) is somehow not anyone would want (especially when using data=journal).

Regards,
Witek


-- 
Witold Baryluk

[Bug 39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412





--- Comment #10 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>  2011-08-29 16:23:57 ---
On Monday, August 29, 2011, Ren, Yongjie wrote:
> I've verified this bug in Linus' tree 3.1.0-rc4. It got fixed, so I closed the bug.
> The commit I tried is below.
> commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Date:   Sun Aug 28 21:16:01 2011 -0700
> 
> Best Regards,
>      Yongjie Ren  (Jay)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@sisk.pl]
> > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 3:01 AM
> > To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
> > Cc: Kernel Testers List; Maciej Rutecki; Florian Mickler; Avi Kivity; Ren, Yongjie;
> > Marcelo Tosatti; Stefan Hajnoczi
> > Subject: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> > 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
> > Subject		: Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> > Submitter	: Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
> > Date		: 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)
> > 
> 
>

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

[Bug 39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412


Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|CODE_FIX                    |UNREPRODUCIBLE




--- Comment #9 from Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>  2011-08-29 08:53:53 ---
Thank you. 
[Because we don't exactly know what fixed it, our rule is to close this as
unreproducible.]

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

[Bug 39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412


Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |CODE_FIX




--- Comment #8 from Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>  2011-08-29 08:48:53 ---
I tried this on Linus' linux 3.1.0-rc4 tree and found this bug got fixed.
The commit I tried is below.
commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sun Aug 28 21:16:01 2011 -0700

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

[Bug 39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412


Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |NEEDINFO
         Resolution|CODE_FIX                    |




--- Comment #7 from Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>  2011-08-24 12:29:52 ---
As far as I can see, the master branch of kvm.git is based upon v3.0.
In fact none of the 3 commits mentioned above are contained in Linus tree.

Can you please test Linus tree (i.e the mainline kernel, currently at v3.1-rc3)
and verify that it works (or doesn't work)?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

[Bug 39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412


Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|VERIFIED                    |CLOSED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

[Bug 39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412


Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |VERIFIED
         Resolution|                            |CODE_FIX




--- Comment #6 from Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>  2011-08-16 02:43:02 ---
This bug has been fixed in master tree of kvm.git
Sorry but I don't think I have time to bisect which commit or patch introduced
and fixed this issue very accurately.
>From git log of Avi's kvm.git master tree:
------good commit----------
commit e62c2ef9d55731476d5783b06c93976c70b96afa
Merge: 2e0d8e2 ca56a95
Author: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 30 11:45:57 2011 +0300

-------bad commit---------
commit e2dd78cba341fa7f4d2aa2a3f2a5ec48615155ad
Merge: 481ac8d 4dd1b49
Author: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jul 7 09:29:58 2011 -0300

-----good commit--------(issue has been fixed)
commite72ef590a3ef3047f6ed5bcb8808a9734f6c4b32
Author: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri Jul 22 12:46:53 2011 +0100

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

RE: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Ren, Yongjie]

Hi folks,
I'm the reporter for the bug. Sorry for being late cause I was busy with other stuff.
I only test upstream of Avi's kvm.git and qemu-kvm.git.
>From my test, my automatic test cases for Win Vista and Win2k8 failed at that time. And I also tried this manually, and met the same issue. So I'm sure this was a bug at that time.
Sorry, I don't think I have time to bisect which commit or patch introduced and fixed this issue very accurately.
I can provide some info.
>From git log of Avi's kvm.git tree:
------good commit---------- 
commit e62c2ef9d55731476d5783b06c93976c70b96afa
Merge: 2e0d8e2 ca56a95
Author: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 30 11:45:57 2011 +0300

-------bad commit---------
commit e2dd78cba341fa7f4d2aa2a3f2a5ec48615155ad
Merge: 481ac8d 4dd1b49
Author: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jul 7 09:29:58 2011 -0300

-----good commit--------(issue has been fixed)
commit e72ef590a3ef3047f6ed5bcb8808a9734f6c4b32
Author: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri Jul 22 12:46:53 2011 +0100


Best Regards,
     Yongjie Ren  (Jay)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian Mickler [mailto:florian@mickler.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 4:17 AM
> To: Avi Kivity
> Cc: Pekka Enberg; Rafael J. Wysocki; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Kernel Testers
> List; Maciej Rutecki; Ren, Yongjie; stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com; KVM
> General
> Subject: Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks
> down
> 
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:07:40 -0700
> Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 08/15/2011 07:31 AM, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:09:37 -0700
> > > Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>  wrote:
> > >
> > > >  On 08/15/2011 06:50 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > >  >  Heh, sorry about that, that's the commit SHA mentioned in the
> above
> > > >  >  bugzilla report. :-)
> > > >  >
> > > >  >
> > > >
> > > >  Think of it as 'git bisect good' input, rather than output.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Can you post a comment to the bug when Linus pulled that tree?
> >
> > Most likely kvm.git got that commit from Linus - I don't think the fix
> > came from kvm.git.
> >
> 
> Hm ok. But the tree tested by the reporter is contained in kvm/master
> and kvm/next and not in Linus tree.
> 
> Anyhow, Rafael did ask the correct question on the bug to resolve
> this. :)
> 
> Regards,
> Flo

RE: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Ren, Yongjie]

Hi folks,
I'm the reporter for the bug. Sorry for being late cause I was busy with other stuff.
I only test upstream of Avi's kvm.git and qemu-kvm.git.
>From my test, my automatic test cases for Win Vista and Win2k8 failed at that time. And I also tried this manually, and met the same issue. So I'm sure this was a bug at that time.
Sorry, I don't think I have time to bisect which commit or patch introduced and fixed this issue very accurately.
I can provide some info.
>From git log of Avi's kvm.git tree:
------good commit---------- 
commit e62c2ef9d55731476d5783b06c93976c70b96afa
Merge: 2e0d8e2 ca56a95
Author: Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date:   Thu Jun 30 11:45:57 2011 +0300

-------bad commit---------
commit e2dd78cba341fa7f4d2aa2a3f2a5ec48615155ad
Merge: 481ac8d 4dd1b49
Author: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date:   Thu Jul 7 09:29:58 2011 -0300

-----good commit--------(issue has been fixed)
commit e72ef590a3ef3047f6ed5bcb8808a9734f6c4b32
Author: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date:   Fri Jul 22 12:46:53 2011 +0100


Best Regards,
     Yongjie Ren  (Jay)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian Mickler [mailto:florian-sVu6HhrpSfRAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 4:17 AM
> To: Avi Kivity
> Cc: Pekka Enberg; Rafael J. Wysocki; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Kernel Testers
> List; Maciej Rutecki; Ren, Yongjie; stefanha-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org; KVM
> General
> Subject: Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks
> down
> 
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:07:40 -0700
> Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 08/15/2011 07:31 AM, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:09:37 -0700
> > > Avi Kivity<avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
> > >
> > > >  On 08/15/2011 06:50 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > >  >  Heh, sorry about that, that's the commit SHA mentioned in the
> above
> > > >  >  bugzilla report. :-)
> > > >  >
> > > >  >
> > > >
> > > >  Think of it as 'git bisect good' input, rather than output.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Can you post a comment to the bug when Linus pulled that tree?
> >
> > Most likely kvm.git got that commit from Linus - I don't think the fix
> > came from kvm.git.
> >
> 
> Hm ok. But the tree tested by the reporter is contained in kvm/master
> and kvm/next and not in Linus tree.
> 
> Anyhow, Rafael did ask the correct question on the bug to resolve
> this. :)
> 
> Regards,
> Flo

RE: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Ren, Yongjie]

Hi folks,
I'm the reporter for the bug. Sorry for being late cause I was busy with other stuff.
I only test upstream of Avi's kvm.git and qemu-kvm.git.
From my test, my automatic test cases for Win Vista and Win2k8 failed at that time. And I also tried this manually, and met the same issue. So I'm sure this was a bug at that time.
Sorry, I don't think I have time to bisect which commit or patch introduced and fixed this issue very accurately.
I can provide some info.
From git log of Avi's kvm.git tree:
------good commit---------- 
commit e62c2ef9d55731476d5783b06c93976c70b96afa
Merge: 2e0d8e2 ca56a95
Author: Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date:   Thu Jun 30 11:45:57 2011 +0300

-------bad commit---------
commit e2dd78cba341fa7f4d2aa2a3f2a5ec48615155ad
Merge: 481ac8d 4dd1b49
Author: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date:   Thu Jul 7 09:29:58 2011 -0300

-----good commit--------(issue has been fixed)
commit e72ef590a3ef3047f6ed5bcb8808a9734f6c4b32
Author: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date:   Fri Jul 22 12:46:53 2011 +0100


Best Regards,
     Yongjie Ren  (Jay)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian Mickler [mailto:florian-sVu6HhrpSfRAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 4:17 AM
> To: Avi Kivity
> Cc: Pekka Enberg; Rafael J. Wysocki; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Kernel Testers
> List; Maciej Rutecki; Ren, Yongjie; stefanha-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org; KVM
> General
> Subject: Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks
> down
> 
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:07:40 -0700
> Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 08/15/2011 07:31 AM, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:09:37 -0700
> > > Avi Kivity<avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
> > >
> > > >  On 08/15/2011 06:50 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > >  >  Heh, sorry about that, that's the commit SHA mentioned in the
> above
> > > >  >  bugzilla report. :-)
> > > >  >
> > > >  >
> > > >
> > > >  Think of it as 'git bisect good' input, rather than output.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Can you post a comment to the bug when Linus pulled that tree?
> >
> > Most likely kvm.git got that commit from Linus - I don't think the fix
> > came from kvm.git.
> >
> 
> Hm ok. But the tree tested by the reporter is contained in kvm/master
> and kvm/next and not in Linus tree.
> 
> Anyhow, Rafael did ask the correct question on the bug to resolve
> this. :)
> 
> Regards,
> Flo

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Florian Mickler]

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:07:40 -0700
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 08/15/2011 07:31 AM, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:09:37 -0700
> > Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>  wrote:
> >
> > >  On 08/15/2011 06:50 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > >  >  Heh, sorry about that, that's the commit SHA mentioned in the above
> > >  >  bugzilla report. :-)
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >
> > >  Think of it as 'git bisect good' input, rather than output.
> > >
> >
> > Can you post a comment to the bug when Linus pulled that tree?
> 
> Most likely kvm.git got that commit from Linus - I don't think the fix 
> came from kvm.git.
> 

Hm ok. But the tree tested by the reporter is contained in kvm/master
and kvm/next and not in Linus tree. 

Anyhow, Rafael did ask the correct question on the bug to resolve
this. :)

Regards,
Flo

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Florian Mickler]

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:07:40 -0700
Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On 08/15/2011 07:31 AM, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:09:37 -0700
> > Avi Kivity<avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
> >
> > >  On 08/15/2011 06:50 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > >  >  Heh, sorry about that, that's the commit SHA mentioned in the above
> > >  >  bugzilla report. :-)
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >
> > >  Think of it as 'git bisect good' input, rather than output.
> > >
> >
> > Can you post a comment to the bug when Linus pulled that tree?
> 
> Most likely kvm.git got that commit from Linus - I don't think the fix 
> came from kvm.git.
> 

Hm ok. But the tree tested by the reporter is contained in kvm/master
and kvm/next and not in Linus tree. 

Anyhow, Rafael did ask the correct question on the bug to resolve
this. :)

Regards,
Flo

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Avi Kivity]

On 08/15/2011 07:31 AM, Florian Mickler wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:09:37 -0700
> Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>  wrote:
>
> >  On 08/15/2011 06:50 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >  >  Heh, sorry about that, that's the commit SHA mentioned in the above
> >  >  bugzilla report. :-)
> >  >
> >  >
> >
> >  Think of it as 'git bisect good' input, rather than output.
> >
>
> Can you post a comment to the bug when Linus pulled that tree?

Most likely kvm.git got that commit from Linus - I don't think the fix 
came from kvm.git.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Florian Mickler]

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:09:37 -0700
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 08/15/2011 06:50 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Heh, sorry about that, that's the commit SHA mentioned in the above
> > bugzilla report. :-)
> >
> >
> 
> Think of it as 'git bisect good' input, rather than output.
> 

Can you post a comment to the bug when Linus pulled that tree?

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Avi Kivity]

On 08/15/2011 06:50 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Heh, sorry about that, that's the commit SHA mentioned in the above
> bugzilla report. :-)
>
>

Think of it as 'git bisect good' input, rather than output.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Avi Kivity]

On 08/15/2011 06:50 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Heh, sorry about that, that's the commit SHA mentioned in the above
> bugzilla report. :-)
>
>

Think of it as 'git bisect good' input, rather than output.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Pekka Enberg]

On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 06:38 -0700, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/15/2011 03:33 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl>  wrote:
> > >  This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > >  of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> > >
> > >  The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > >  introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> > >  be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > >  Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
> > >  Subject         : Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> > >  Submitter       : Jay Ren<yongjie.ren@intel.com>
> > >  Date            : 2011-07-15 15:31 (31 days old)
> >
> > The bugzilla report claims that this commit fixes the regression:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commitdiff;h=e72ef590a3ef3047f6ed5bcb8808a9734f6c4b32
> >
> > The commit, however, is not in mainline nor does it seem to be tagged
> > for -stable.
> 
> That commit is completely unrelated.

Heh, sorry about that, that's the commit SHA mentioned in the above
bugzilla report. :-)

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Pekka Enberg]

On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 06:38 -0700, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/15/2011 03:33 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
> > >  This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > >  of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> > >
> > >  The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > >  introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> > >  be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > >  Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
> > >  Subject         : Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> > >  Submitter       : Jay Ren<yongjie.ren-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > >  Date            : 2011-07-15 15:31 (31 days old)
> >
> > The bugzilla report claims that this commit fixes the regression:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commitdiff;h=e72ef590a3ef3047f6ed5bcb8808a9734f6c4b32
> >
> > The commit, however, is not in mainline nor does it seem to be tagged
> > for -stable.
> 
> That commit is completely unrelated.

Heh, sorry about that, that's the commit SHA mentioned in the above
bugzilla report. :-)

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Avi Kivity]

On 08/15/2011 03:33 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl>  wrote:
> >  This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >  of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> >
> >  The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >  introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> >  be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> >  Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
> >  Subject         : Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> >  Submitter       : Jay Ren<yongjie.ren@intel.com>
> >  Date            : 2011-07-15 15:31 (31 days old)
>
> The bugzilla report claims that this commit fixes the regression:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commitdiff;h=e72ef590a3ef3047f6ed5bcb8808a9734f6c4b32
>
> The commit, however, is not in mainline nor does it seem to be tagged
> for -stable.

That commit is completely unrelated.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Pekka Enberg]

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
> Subject         : Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> Submitter       : Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
> Date            : 2011-07-15 15:31 (31 days old)

The bugzilla report claims that this commit fixes the regression:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commitdiff;h=e72ef590a3ef3047f6ed5bcb8808a9734f6c4b32

The commit, however, is not in mainline nor does it seem to be tagged
for -stable.

Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Pekka Enberg]

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
> Subject         : Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> Submitter       : Jay Ren <yongjie.ren-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2011-07-15 15:31 (31 days old)

The bugzilla report claims that this commit fixes the regression:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commitdiff;h=e72ef590a3ef3047f6ed5bcb8808a9734f6c4b32

The commit, however, is not in mainline nor does it seem to be tagged
for -stable.

[Bug 39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412


Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|VERIFIED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|CODE_FIX                    |

Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEEDINFO




--- Comment #4 from Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>  2011-08-04 20:41:57 ---
Please close it, when it hit's Linus tree. In the meantime we leave it as open,
so this doesn't get lost. 

Do you have a pointer to the actual commit that fixed it?

--- Comment #5 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>  2011-08-14 19:13:36 ---
Has the bug been fixed in the mainline kernel?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

[Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
Subject		: Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
Submitter	: Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
Date		: 2011-07-15 15:31 (31 days old)

[Bug 39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412


Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |VERIFIED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

[Bug 39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412


Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |CODE_FIX




--- Comment #3 from Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>  2011-07-29 11:16:55 ---
This bug got fixed and I verified it. It doesn't exist in latest kvm.git tree
e72ef590a3ef3047f6ed5bcb8808a9734f6c4b32.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

[Bug 39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412


Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Win Vista and Win2K8 guests |Win Vista and Win2K8
                   |cann't find NIC driver      |guests' network breaks down




--- Comment #2 from Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>  2011-07-17 10:39:20 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Driver for Realtek nic (rtl8139) is no longer included in inbox drivers
> starting with Windows Vista.
> 
> Either use e1000 driver NIC or it is possible to copy related files from the
> previous Windows (XP) and use them (inf, sys files).
Guest have driver for the assigned NIC ( If not originally, I installed the
driver), but network in guest breaks down. Sorry for unclear description, and I
modified the bug title. It shows NIC has driver, but network breaks down, for
example guest cannot get IP from the DHCP server. If using kvm.git commit
e62c2ef9, it doesn't have this issue. I use the same win2k8 and Vista image in
my test.
BTW, even if I use e1000 NIC, Win2k8 and Vista guest's network is bad, while
Win7 and Win XP works well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.