All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shawn.guo@freescale.com (Shawn Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: i.MX multi SoC patches
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:05:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110831140527.GA3723@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAODfWeFnsQZBsBXpJLVknzvqcythZjDMyfe8sb9Pdw_uK-iB2g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:02:58PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 
> 2011/8/24 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>:
> > This is hopefully the last iteration of the patches for compiling
> > all ARMv4/v5 based i.MXs together. CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT
> > lost its experimental status and we can still build uImages
> > even with CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR enabled. This series selects
> > these options and makes a multi SoC image the default.
> > Also, we can now build all i.MX5 SoCs into a single image.
> > This series also updates the defconfigs.
> 
> On a mx53 loco board I have rebased Richard's patchset for SATA and
> got it running, but I see this on mapping on iomem, board is more or
> less working but I was unsure if this is something significant or just
> some ugly cosmetic names for mx53 (i.e. imx21-uart.0, imx31-gpio, ..)
> 
This is expected.  The platform_device_id had been used to kill
cpu_is_mxXX() stuff from drivers.  And we decided to use soc prefix
to define IP block version in platform_device_id table, because
hardware does not define revisions, and soc is stable enough to
identify specific IP block version.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn

      reply	other threads:[~2011-08-31 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-24  8:03 Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM i.MX: allow to compile together ARMv4 and ARMv5 based SoCs Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM i.MX: allow to compile together all i.MX5 " Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM i.MX5: update defconfig Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM i.MX defconfigs: use one defconfig for all ARMv4/v5 SoCs Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24 23:03 ` i.MX multi SoC patches Hector Oron
2011-08-25  6:38   ` Sascha Hauer
2011-08-25 11:44   ` hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 11:44     ` [PATCH] ARM: mx5: fix remaining unconsistent names for irqs hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 11:52     ` i.MX multi SoC patches Hector Oron
2011-08-25 12:55   ` [PATCH] ARM: mx5: fix remaining unconsistent names for irqs hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 14:16     ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-08-25 14:54     ` Sascha Hauer
2011-08-31 13:02 ` i.MX multi SoC patches Hector Oron
2011-08-31 14:05   ` Shawn Guo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110831140527.GA3723@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net \
    --to=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --subject='Re: i.MX multi SoC patches' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.