All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/18] block: add bdi flag to indicate risk of io queue underrun
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:37:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110907023719.GC13755@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315318968.14232.6.camel@twins>

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:22:48PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 09:53 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > +++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c      2011-08-31 14:40:58.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -1067,6 +1067,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
> >                                      nr_dirty, bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty,
> >                                      start_time);
> >  
> > +               if (unlikely(!dirty_exceeded && bdi_async_underrun(bdi)))
> > +                       break;
> > +
> >                 dirty_ratelimit = bdi->dirty_ratelimit;
> >                 pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio(bdi, dirty_thresh,
> >                                                background_thresh, nr_dirty,
> 
> So dirty_exceeded looks like:
> 
> 
> 1109                 dirty_exceeded = (bdi_dirty > bdi_thresh) ||
> 1110                                   (nr_dirty > dirty_thresh);
> 
> Would it make sense to write it as:
> 
> 	if (nr_dirty > dirty_thresh || 
> 	    (nr_dirty > freerun && bdi_dirty > bdi_thresh))
> 		dirty_exceeded = 1;
> 
> So that we don't actually throttle bdi thingies when we're still in the
> freerun area?

Sounds not necessary -- (nr_dirty > freerun) is implicitly true
because there is a big break early in the loop:

        if (nr_dirty > freerun)
                break;

Thanks,
Fengguang

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/18] block: add bdi flag to indicate risk of io queue underrun
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:37:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110907023719.GC13755@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315318968.14232.6.camel@twins>

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:22:48PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 09:53 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > +++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c      2011-08-31 14:40:58.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -1067,6 +1067,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
> >                                      nr_dirty, bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty,
> >                                      start_time);
> >  
> > +               if (unlikely(!dirty_exceeded && bdi_async_underrun(bdi)))
> > +                       break;
> > +
> >                 dirty_ratelimit = bdi->dirty_ratelimit;
> >                 pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio(bdi, dirty_thresh,
> >                                                background_thresh, nr_dirty,
> 
> So dirty_exceeded looks like:
> 
> 
> 1109                 dirty_exceeded = (bdi_dirty > bdi_thresh) ||
> 1110                                   (nr_dirty > dirty_thresh);
> 
> Would it make sense to write it as:
> 
> 	if (nr_dirty > dirty_thresh || 
> 	    (nr_dirty > freerun && bdi_dirty > bdi_thresh))
> 		dirty_exceeded = 1;
> 
> So that we don't actually throttle bdi thingies when we're still in the
> freerun area?

Sounds not necessary -- (nr_dirty > freerun) is implicitly true
because there is a big break early in the loop:

        if (nr_dirty > freerun)
                break;

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-07  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 175+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-04  1:53 [PATCH 00/18] IO-less dirty throttling v11 Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 01/18] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 02/18] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-05 15:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-05 15:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06  2:10     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06  2:10       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-05 15:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-05 15:05     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06  2:43     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06  2:43       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 18:20   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-06 18:20     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-08  2:53     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-08  2:53       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-12  5:44   ` Nai Xia
2011-11-12  5:44     ` Nai Xia
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 03/18] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 11:57   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 11:57     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 04/18] writeback: stabilize bdi->dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 05/18] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 15:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 15:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 15:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 23:27     ` Jan Kara
2011-09-06 23:27       ` Jan Kara
2011-09-06 23:34       ` Jan Kara
2011-09-06 23:34         ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07  7:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  7:27         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  7:27         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  1:04     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07  1:04       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07  7:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  7:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  7:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 11:00         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 11:00           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 06/18] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 12:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 12:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 12:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  2:46     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07  2:46       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 07/18] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 08/18] writeback: trace dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 09/18] writeback: trace balance_dirty_pages Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 10/18] writeback: dirty position control - bdi reserve area Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 14:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 14:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 14:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 12:31     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 12:31       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-12 10:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-12 10:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-12 10:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-18 14:17         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:37           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:37             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:47             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:47               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-28 14:02               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-28 14:50                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-28 14:50                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29  3:32                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29  3:32                     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29  8:49                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29  8:49                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29  8:49                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29 11:05                       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 11:05                         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 12:15                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 11/18] block: add bdi flag to indicate risk of io queue underrun Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 14:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 14:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  2:37     ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-09-07  2:37       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07  7:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  7:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  7:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 12/18] writeback: balanced_rate cannot exceed write bandwidth Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 13/18] writeback: limit max dirty pause time Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 14:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 14:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 14:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  2:35     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07  2:35       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-12 10:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-12 10:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-12 10:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-18 14:23         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:23           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 14/18] writeback: control " Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 15:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 15:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 15:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  2:02     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07  2:02       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-12 10:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-12 10:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-12 10:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 15/18] writeback: charge leaked page dirties to active tasks Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 16:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 16:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 16:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  9:06     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07  9:06       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07  0:17   ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07  0:17     ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07  9:37     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 16/18] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 17/18] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on redirty Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 16:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 16:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 16:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  0:22     ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07  0:22       ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07  1:18       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07  6:56       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-07  6:56         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-07  8:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  8:19           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07  8:19           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 16:42           ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 16:42             ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 16:46             ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-07 16:46               ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-08  8:51               ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-09-08  8:51                 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-09-04  1:53 ` [PATCH 18/18] btrfs: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04  1:53   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 13:32 ` [PATCH 00/18] IO-less dirty throttling v11 Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 13:32   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 19:14   ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-07 19:14     ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-28 14:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-28 14:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-29  4:11   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29  4:11     ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110907023719.GC13755@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arighi@develer.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.