From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] hwspinlock-next
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:28:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110921152812.GE2937@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201109211612.33504.arnd@arndb.de>
* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [110921 06:39]:
> On Wednesday 21 September 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> [110920 01:34]:
> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm wondering how hwspinlock updates like this should go upstream.
> > >
> > > The first hwspinlock batch was picked by Tony, because it involved a
> > > bulk of OMAP changes.
> > >
> > > Hwspinlock isn't OMAP-specific anymore though (we gained support for
> > > STE's u8500) and the vast majority of changes are in drivers/. We're
> > > still very much ARM-related, though this may change too at some point
> > > (c6x has a similar "hardware semaphore" peripheral like the u8500
> > > does).
> > >
> > > Tony, if you're still willing to pick up these updates I'd be happy to
> > > send you pull requests of course.
> >
> > I'd prefer for Greg to take these as these are drivers.
> >
> > If he's not taking it at this point based on it being ARM only,
> > I can take it then.
>
> Sorry for replying late, I had accidentally ignored the entire thread.
>
> My feeling is that it would be best for Ohad to send these directly
> to Linus, since it's basically a standalone subsystem and he's listed
> as the maintainer (well, after this series at least).
Ohad can you please try this first? Just please make sure your patches are
first in next tree before sending in the pull request.
> I'm also fine with any of the other paths like
>
> ohad->GregKH->torvalds
Greg does not prefer that as it's ARM only currently.
> ohad->arnd->torvalds
> ohad->tmlind->torvalds
> ohad->tmlind->arnd->torvalds
So as a backup plan any of these are also fine with me too.
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] hwspinlock-next
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:28:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110921152812.GE2937@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201109211612.33504.arnd@arndb.de>
* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [110921 06:39]:
> On Wednesday 21 September 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> [110920 01:34]:
> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm wondering how hwspinlock updates like this should go upstream.
> > >
> > > The first hwspinlock batch was picked by Tony, because it involved a
> > > bulk of OMAP changes.
> > >
> > > Hwspinlock isn't OMAP-specific anymore though (we gained support for
> > > STE's u8500) and the vast majority of changes are in drivers/. We're
> > > still very much ARM-related, though this may change too at some point
> > > (c6x has a similar "hardware semaphore" peripheral like the u8500
> > > does).
> > >
> > > Tony, if you're still willing to pick up these updates I'd be happy to
> > > send you pull requests of course.
> >
> > I'd prefer for Greg to take these as these are drivers.
> >
> > If he's not taking it at this point based on it being ARM only,
> > I can take it then.
>
> Sorry for replying late, I had accidentally ignored the entire thread.
>
> My feeling is that it would be best for Ohad to send these directly
> to Linus, since it's basically a standalone subsystem and he's listed
> as the maintainer (well, after this series at least).
Ohad can you please try this first? Just please make sure your patches are
first in next tree before sending in the pull request.
> I'm also fine with any of the other paths like
>
> ohad->GregKH->torvalds
Greg does not prefer that as it's ARM only currently.
> ohad->arnd->torvalds
> ohad->tmlind->torvalds
> ohad->tmlind->arnd->torvalds
So as a backup plan any of these are also fine with me too.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-21 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-12 16:46 [PATCH 00/10] hwspinlock-next Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` [PATCH 01/10] hwspinlock/core: simplify Kconfig Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` [PATCH 02/10] hwspinlock/core: simplify 'owner' handling Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` [PATCH 03/10] hwspinlock/omap: simplify allocation scheme Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` [PATCH 04/10] hwspinlock/core/omap: fix id issues on multiple hwspinlock devices Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:46 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-21 16:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-21 16:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 05/10] hwspinlock/core: use a mutex to protect the radix tree Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 06/10] hwspinlock/core: remove stubs for register/unregister Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 07/10] hwspinlock/core: register a bank of hwspinlocks in a single API call Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 08/10] hwspinlock/u8500: add hwspinlock driver Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 09/10] hwspinlock/omap: omap_hwspinlock_remove should be __devexit Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 10/10] hwspinlock: add MAINTAINERS entries Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:47 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 16:58 ` Joe Perches
2011-09-12 16:58 ` Joe Perches
2011-09-12 16:58 ` Joe Perches
2011-09-12 17:01 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 17:01 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-12 17:01 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-20 9:07 ` [PATCH 00/10] hwspinlock-next Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-20 9:07 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-20 9:07 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-20 23:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-20 23:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-20 23:45 ` Greg KH
2011-09-20 23:45 ` Greg KH
2011-09-21 15:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-21 15:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-21 14:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-21 14:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-21 15:28 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-09-21 15:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-21 15:56 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-21 15:56 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-21 15:56 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-21 16:07 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-21 16:07 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-21 16:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-21 16:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-21 16:16 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-21 16:16 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-21 15:53 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-21 15:53 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-21 16:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-21 16:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110921152812.GE2937@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.