All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON configuration option removal
@ 2011-09-26  3:37 ` Guenter Roeck
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2011-09-26  3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors; +Cc: Rene Herman, linux-kernel

Hi,

I just noticed the folllowing in feature-removal-schedule.txt:

What:   CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON
When:   January 2009
Why:    This option was introduced just to allow older lm-sensors userspace
        to keep working over the upgrade to 2.6.26. At the scheduled time of
        removal fixed lm-sensors (2.x or 3.x) should be readily available.
Who:    Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>

I don't know what the lm-sensors changes are, and if they have been implemented.
Is it time to remove the configuration option ?

Thanks,
Guenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [lm-sensors] CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON configuration option removal
@ 2011-09-26  3:37 ` Guenter Roeck
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2011-09-26  3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors; +Cc: Rene Herman, linux-kernel

Hi,

I just noticed the folllowing in feature-removal-schedule.txt:

What:   CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON
When:   January 2009
Why:    This option was introduced just to allow older lm-sensors userspace
        to keep working over the upgrade to 2.6.26. At the scheduled time of
        removal fixed lm-sensors (2.x or 3.x) should be readily available.
Who:    Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>

I don't know what the lm-sensors changes are, and if they have been implemented.
Is it time to remove the configuration option ?

Thanks,
Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON configuration option removal
  2011-09-26  3:37 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
@ 2011-09-26  8:32   ` Jean Delvare
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2011-09-26  8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: lm-sensors, linux-kernel, Rene Herman

Hi Guenter,

On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:37:40 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I just noticed the folllowing in feature-removal-schedule.txt:
> 
> What:   CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON
> When:   January 2009
> Why:    This option was introduced just to allow older lm-sensors userspace
>         to keep working over the upgrade to 2.6.26. At the scheduled time of
>         removal fixed lm-sensors (2.x or 3.x) should be readily available.
> Who:    Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
> 
> I don't know what the lm-sensors changes are, and if they have been implemented.
> Is it time to remove the configuration option ?

Not sure where you looked, but it's already gone. See commit
ab92402af04c151c26541eb28e1c26286a429db5.

-- 
Jean Delvare

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON configuration option removal
@ 2011-09-26  8:32   ` Jean Delvare
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2011-09-26  8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: lm-sensors, linux-kernel, Rene Herman

Hi Guenter,

On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:37:40 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I just noticed the folllowing in feature-removal-schedule.txt:
> 
> What:   CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON
> When:   January 2009
> Why:    This option was introduced just to allow older lm-sensors userspace
>         to keep working over the upgrade to 2.6.26. At the scheduled time of
>         removal fixed lm-sensors (2.x or 3.x) should be readily available.
> Who:    Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
> 
> I don't know what the lm-sensors changes are, and if they have been implemented.
> Is it time to remove the configuration option ?

Not sure where you looked, but it's already gone. See commit
ab92402af04c151c26541eb28e1c26286a429db5.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON configuration option removal
  2011-09-26  8:32   ` Jean Delvare
@ 2011-09-26 14:59     ` Guenter Roeck
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2011-09-26 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: lm-sensors, linux-kernel, Rene Herman

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 04:32 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:37:40 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > I just noticed the folllowing in feature-removal-schedule.txt:
> > 
> > What:   CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON
> > When:   January 2009
> > Why:    This option was introduced just to allow older lm-sensors userspace
> >         to keep working over the upgrade to 2.6.26. At the scheduled time of
> >         removal fixed lm-sensors (2.x or 3.x) should be readily available.
> > Who:    Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
> > 
> > I don't know what the lm-sensors changes are, and if they have been implemented.
> > Is it time to remove the configuration option ?
> 
> Not sure where you looked, but it's already gone. See commit
> ab92402af04c151c26541eb28e1c26286a429db5.
> 
Ah yes, now I remember. No idea what I looked at. Should teach me to
clean up my branches.

Sorry for the noise.

Guenter



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON configuration option removal
@ 2011-09-26 14:59     ` Guenter Roeck
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2011-09-26 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: lm-sensors, linux-kernel, Rene Herman

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 04:32 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:37:40 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > I just noticed the folllowing in feature-removal-schedule.txt:
> > 
> > What:   CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON
> > When:   January 2009
> > Why:    This option was introduced just to allow older lm-sensors userspace
> >         to keep working over the upgrade to 2.6.26. At the scheduled time of
> >         removal fixed lm-sensors (2.x or 3.x) should be readily available.
> > Who:    Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
> > 
> > I don't know what the lm-sensors changes are, and if they have been implemented.
> > Is it time to remove the configuration option ?
> 
> Not sure where you looked, but it's already gone. See commit
> ab92402af04c151c26541eb28e1c26286a429db5.
> 
Ah yes, now I remember. No idea what I looked at. Should teach me to
clean up my branches.

Sorry for the noise.

Guenter



_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-26 15:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-26  3:37 CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON configuration option removal Guenter Roeck
2011-09-26  3:37 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2011-09-26  8:32 ` Jean Delvare
2011-09-26  8:32   ` Jean Delvare
2011-09-26 14:59   ` Guenter Roeck
2011-09-26 14:59     ` Guenter Roeck

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.