From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [patch] oom: thaw threads if oom killed thread is frozen before deferring Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:30:36 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20110930153036.GA19095@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20110929180021.GA27999@tiehlicka.suse.cz> On 09/29, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 29-09-11 18:37:24, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > Oh, I don't think so. For what? This doesn't close other races, and > > in fact the fatal_signal_pending() this patch adds is itself racy, > > SIGKILL can come in between. > > OK, I think I see your point. You mean that oom will send KILL after > both fatal_signal_pending in refrigerator and signal_pending check in > schedule, right? No, schedule()->signal_pending_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) doesn't check the signals. I simply meant if (fatal_signal_pending()) // <--- SIGKILL from oom try_to_freeze(); > This is what the follow up fix from David is doing. Check frozen in > select_bad_process if the task is TIF_MEMDIE and thaw the process. > > And it seems that the David's follow up fix is sufficient so let's leave > refrigerator alone. Agreed, afaics this should fix all races (although I didn't read the whole discussion, perhaps I missed something else). And in this case we do not even need to modify oom_kill_task/etc, select_bad_process() will be called again and notice the frozen task eventually. Afaics. Or, as Tejun suggests, we can implement the race-free kill-even-if-frozen later. Oleg.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [patch] oom: thaw threads if oom killed thread is frozen before deferring Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:30:36 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20110930153036.GA19095@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20110929180021.GA27999@tiehlicka.suse.cz> On 09/29, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 29-09-11 18:37:24, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > Oh, I don't think so. For what? This doesn't close other races, and > > in fact the fatal_signal_pending() this patch adds is itself racy, > > SIGKILL can come in between. > > OK, I think I see your point. You mean that oom will send KILL after > both fatal_signal_pending in refrigerator and signal_pending check in > schedule, right? No, schedule()->signal_pending_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) doesn't check the signals. I simply meant if (fatal_signal_pending()) // <--- SIGKILL from oom try_to_freeze(); > This is what the follow up fix from David is doing. Check frozen in > select_bad_process if the task is TIF_MEMDIE and thaw the process. > > And it seems that the David's follow up fix is sufficient so let's leave > refrigerator alone. Agreed, afaics this should fix all races (although I didn't read the whole discussion, perhaps I missed something else). And in this case we do not even need to modify oom_kill_task/etc, select_bad_process() will be called again and notice the frozen task eventually. Afaics. Or, as Tejun suggests, we can implement the race-free kill-even-if-frozen later. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-30 15:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-09-27 8:09 [PATCH 0/2] oom: fix livelock when frozen task is selected Michal Hocko 2011-09-27 6:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] lguest: move process freezing before pending signals check Michal Hocko 2011-10-12 6:55 ` Michal Hocko 2011-10-12 6:55 ` Michal Hocko 2011-10-12 23:57 ` Rusty Russell 2011-10-12 23:57 ` Rusty Russell 2011-10-13 5:48 ` Michal Hocko 2011-10-13 5:48 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-27 8:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] oom: do not live lock on frozen tasks Michal Hocko 2011-09-27 18:35 ` [patch] oom: thaw threads if oom killed thread is frozen before deferring David Rientjes 2011-09-27 18:35 ` David Rientjes 2011-09-28 10:44 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-28 10:44 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-29 11:51 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-29 11:51 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-29 12:05 ` Oleg Nesterov 2011-09-29 12:05 ` Oleg Nesterov 2011-09-29 13:02 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-29 13:02 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-29 16:32 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-29 16:32 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-29 16:37 ` Oleg Nesterov 2011-09-29 16:37 ` Oleg Nesterov 2011-09-29 18:00 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-29 18:00 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-30 1:51 ` Tejun Heo 2011-09-30 1:51 ` Tejun Heo 2011-09-30 7:41 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-30 7:41 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-30 7:46 ` Tejun Heo 2011-09-30 7:46 ` Tejun Heo 2011-09-30 8:04 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-30 8:04 ` Michal Hocko 2011-09-30 15:30 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message] 2011-09-30 15:30 ` Oleg Nesterov 2011-10-28 22:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] oom: do not live lock on frozen tasks Andrew Morton 2011-10-28 22:23 ` Andrew Morton 2011-10-29 9:01 ` Michal Hocko 2011-10-29 9:01 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20110930153036.GA19095@redhat.com \ --to=oleg@redhat.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=htejun@gmail.com \ --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \ --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \ --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \ --cc=rientjes@google.com \ --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \ --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.