[GIT PULL] mxs/clk for v3.4

[GIT PULL] mxs/clk for v3.4

[Shawn Guo]

Hi Arnd, Olof,

Please pull the following mxs clock changes for v3.4.  It has no
conflict with rmk/for-armsoc branch.

Regards,
Shawn

The following changes since commit dcd6c92267155e70a94b3927bce681ce74b80d1f:

  Linux 3.3-rc1 (2012-01-19 15:04:48 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:
  git://git.linaro.org/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git mxs/clk

Fabio Estevam (1):
      ARM: mxs: Use a proper timeout mechanism

Lothar Wa?mann (1):
      arm/mxs: Add support for SSP/MMC ports 2 & 3

Wolfram Sang (1):
      ARM: mx28: check for gated clocks when setting saif divider

 arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx23.c               |   34 ++-------------
 arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c               |   57 ++++++-------------------
 arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/platform-mxs-mmc.c |    2 +
 arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/common.h      |    2 +
 arch/arm/mach-mxs/system.c                   |   16 +++++++
 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

[GIT PULL] mxs/clk for v3.4

[Olof Johansson]

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Arnd, Olof,
>
> Please pull the following mxs clock changes for v3.4. ?It has no
> conflict with rmk/for-armsoc branch.
>
> Regards,
> Shawn
>
> The following changes since commit dcd6c92267155e70a94b3927bce681ce74b80d1f:
>
> ?Linux 3.3-rc1 (2012-01-19 15:04:48 -0800)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> ?git://git.linaro.org/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git mxs/clk
>
> Fabio Estevam (1):
> ? ? ?ARM: mxs: Use a proper timeout mechanism
>
> Lothar Wa?mann (1):
> ? ? ?arm/mxs: Add support for SSP/MMC ports 2 & 3
>
> Wolfram Sang (1):
> ? ? ?ARM: mx28: check for gated clocks when setting saif divider


Pulled, thanks. Minor nit: in the future, please use the "ARM:
<platform>:" format consistently for patch prefixes.


-Olof

[GIT PULL] mxs/clk for v3.4

[Shawn Guo]

On 8 February 2012 17:14, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
...
>> Lothar Wa?mann (1):
>> ? ? ?arm/mxs: Add support for SSP/MMC ports 2 & 3
...
> Pulled, thanks. Minor nit: in the future, please use the "ARM:
> <platform>:" format consistently for patch prefixes.
>
Ah, yes.  That patch was collected last cycle when we have not agreed
on this pattern.  And I forgot to change it later on.

Regards,
Shawn