* [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode
@ 2012-02-23 9:13 Viresh Kumar
2012-02-23 10:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2012-02-23 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
sp810 controller can change system's working mode to various power save
states. Introduce an API to accomplish the same.
Signed-off-by: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h
index e0d1c0c..df0960a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h
@@ -14,10 +14,25 @@
#ifndef __ASM_ARM_SP810_H
#define __ASM_ARM_SP810_H
+#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/jiffies.h>
/* sysctl registers offset */
#define SCCTRL 0x000
+ #define SYS_MODE_STS_MASK (0xF << 3)
+ #define SYS_MODE_STS_SLEEP (0x0 << 3)
+ #define SYS_MODE_STS_DOZE (0x1 << 3)
+ #define SYS_MODE_STS_SLOW (0x2 << 3)
+ #define SYS_MODE_STS_NORMAL (0x4 << 3)
+
+ #define SYS_MODE_MASK (0x7 << 0)
+ #define SYS_MODE_SLEEP (0x0 << 0)
+ #define SYS_MODE_DOZE (0x1 << 0)
+ #define SYS_MODE_SLOW (0x2 << 0)
+ #define SYS_MODE_NORMAL (0x4 << 0)
+
#define SCSYSSTAT 0x004
#define SCIMCTRL 0x008
#define SCIMSTAT 0x00C
@@ -65,4 +80,46 @@ static inline void sysctl_soft_reset(void __iomem *base)
writel(0, base + SCSYSSTAT);
}
+static inline int sysctl_change_mode(void __iomem *base, int mode)
+{
+ u32 val, mode_sts;
+ unsigned long finish;
+
+ switch (mode) {
+ case SYS_MODE_SLEEP:
+ mode_sts = SYS_MODE_STS_SLEEP;
+ break;
+ case SYS_MODE_DOZE:
+ mode_sts = SYS_MODE_STS_DOZE;
+ break;
+ case SYS_MODE_SLOW:
+ mode_sts = SYS_MODE_STS_SLOW;
+ break;
+ case SYS_MODE_NORMAL:
+ mode_sts = SYS_MODE_STS_NORMAL;
+ break;
+ default:
+ pr_err("Wrong system mode\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ val = readl(base + SCCTRL);
+ if ((val & SYS_MODE_STS_MASK) == mode_sts)
+ return 0;
+
+ val &= ~SYS_MODE_MASK;
+ val |= mode;
+ writel(val, base + SCCTRL);
+
+ /* read back if mode is set */
+ finish = jiffies + 2 * HZ;
+ do {
+ val = readl(base + SCCTRL);
+ if ((val & SYS_MODE_STS_MASK) == mode_sts)
+ return 0;
+ udelay(1000);
+ } while (!time_after_eq(jiffies, finish));
+
+ return -EFAULT;
+}
#endif /* __ASM_ARM_SP810_H */
--
1.7.8.110.g4cb5d
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode
2012-02-23 9:13 [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode Viresh Kumar
@ 2012-02-23 10:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-23 10:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-02-27 10:38 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-29 20:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2012-02-23 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:43:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> From: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
>
> sp810 controller can change system's working mode to various power save
> states. Introduce an API to accomplish the same.
Where is the documentation for this peripheral? I've never seen any
documentation on ARMs website for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h
> index e0d1c0c..df0960a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h
> @@ -14,10 +14,25 @@
> #ifndef __ASM_ARM_SP810_H
> #define __ASM_ARM_SP810_H
>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>
> /* sysctl registers offset */
> #define SCCTRL 0x000
> + #define SYS_MODE_STS_MASK (0xF << 3)
> + #define SYS_MODE_STS_SLEEP (0x0 << 3)
> + #define SYS_MODE_STS_DOZE (0x1 << 3)
> + #define SYS_MODE_STS_SLOW (0x2 << 3)
> + #define SYS_MODE_STS_NORMAL (0x4 << 3)
> +
> + #define SYS_MODE_MASK (0x7 << 0)
> + #define SYS_MODE_SLEEP (0x0 << 0)
> + #define SYS_MODE_DOZE (0x1 << 0)
> + #define SYS_MODE_SLOW (0x2 << 0)
> + #define SYS_MODE_NORMAL (0x4 << 0)
> +
> #define SCSYSSTAT 0x004
> #define SCIMCTRL 0x008
> #define SCIMSTAT 0x00C
> @@ -65,4 +80,46 @@ static inline void sysctl_soft_reset(void __iomem *base)
> writel(0, base + SCSYSSTAT);
> }
>
> +static inline int sysctl_change_mode(void __iomem *base, int mode)
> +{
> + u32 val, mode_sts;
> + unsigned long finish;
> +
> + switch (mode) {
> + case SYS_MODE_SLEEP:
> + mode_sts = SYS_MODE_STS_SLEEP;
> + break;
> + case SYS_MODE_DOZE:
> + mode_sts = SYS_MODE_STS_DOZE;
> + break;
> + case SYS_MODE_SLOW:
> + mode_sts = SYS_MODE_STS_SLOW;
> + break;
> + case SYS_MODE_NORMAL:
> + mode_sts = SYS_MODE_STS_NORMAL;
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_err("Wrong system mode\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + val = readl(base + SCCTRL);
> + if ((val & SYS_MODE_STS_MASK) == mode_sts)
> + return 0;
> +
> + val &= ~SYS_MODE_MASK;
> + val |= mode;
> + writel(val, base + SCCTRL);
> +
> + /* read back if mode is set */
> + finish = jiffies + 2 * HZ;
> + do {
> + val = readl(base + SCCTRL);
> + if ((val & SYS_MODE_STS_MASK) == mode_sts)
> + return 0;
> + udelay(1000);
> + } while (!time_after_eq(jiffies, finish));
> +
> + return -EFAULT;
> +}
> #endif /* __ASM_ARM_SP810_H */
> --
> 1.7.8.110.g4cb5d
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode
2012-02-23 10:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2012-02-23 10:31 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2012-02-23 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 2/23/2012 3:33 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:43:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> > From: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
>> >
>> > sp810 controller can change system's working mode to various power save
>> > states. Introduce an API to accomplish the same.
> Where is the documentation for this peripheral? I've never seen any
> documentation on ARMs website for it.
>
Even i couldn't locate it now :(
Documentation does mention it at several places, but didn't give a link.
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0440b/CHDJAIGE.html
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode
2012-02-23 9:13 [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode Viresh Kumar
2012-02-23 10:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2012-02-27 10:38 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-27 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-29 20:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2012-02-27 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com> wrote:
> sp810 controller can change system's working mode to various power save
> states. Introduce an API to accomplish the same.
OK...
> +static inline int sysctl_change_mode(void __iomem *base, int mode)
Why do you make this a static inline?
And why is the present soft reset code also static inlined?
When I look at how this is used in arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
it's apparently glued back-to-back with the SP804
so I think it should be some CONFIG_HAS_SP810
and put directly into common/timer-sp.c.
#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_SP810
/* Put SP810 specific support functions here */
void __init sp810_clockevents_init(void __iomem *sp804_base, void
__iomem *sp810_base, unsigned int irq, const char *name)
{
/* Do some SP810 magic stuff */
/* Calls sp804_clockevents_init() */
}
#endif
Maybe I'm delusional but I think this could help centralizing the use
of the SP* cells, since they're obviously used in both SPEAr and
versatile express.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode
2012-02-27 10:38 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2012-02-27 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-27 15:29 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2012-02-27 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:38:14AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Maybe I'm delusional but I think this could help centralizing the use
> of the SP* cells, since they're obviously used in both SPEAr and
> versatile express.
They can be used in any PrimeXsys based system, and I don't see that
there's anything which guarantees having both a SP810 and SP804
together.
There are platforms which have SP804 without SP810 - Integrator CP
and bcmring seem to fall into that category.
But... the register concerned does a whole load of other things, and
I'm not sure we want to have accesses to it de-centralized.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode
2012-02-27 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2012-02-27 15:29 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-27 15:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2012-02-27 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:38:14AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Maybe I'm delusional but I think this could help centralizing the use
>> of the SP* cells, since they're obviously used in both SPEAr and
>> versatile express.
>
> They can be used in any PrimeXsys based system, and I don't see that
> there's anything which guarantees having both a SP810 and SP804
> together.
>
> There are platforms which have SP804 without SP810 - Integrator CP
> and bcmring seem to fall into that category.
I was more thinking the other way around - I think that all systems
with an SP810 also have an SP804.
I'm led to thinking this because of these registers:
#define SCCTRL_TIMEREN0SEL_REFCLK (0 << 15)
#define SCCTRL_TIMEREN0SEL_TIMCLK (1 << 15)
#define SCCTRL_TIMEREN1SEL_REFCLK (0 << 17)
#define SCCTRL_TIMEREN1SEL_TIMCLK (1 << 17)
TIMER0 and TIMER1 seems to indicate TIMER0 and TIMER1
of the SP804 block.
In any case it seems to depend on CONFIG_ARM_TIMER_SP804.
> But... the register concerned does a whole load of other things, and
> I'm not sure we want to have accesses to it de-centralized.
Sure, just arch/arm/common/sc-810.c works fine as well.
Now I got incentive to finally write that letter to Greg about what
to do with system controllers.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode
2012-02-27 15:29 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2012-02-27 15:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2012-02-27 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:29:58PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:38:14AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> Maybe I'm delusional but I think this could help centralizing the use
> >> of the SP* cells, since they're obviously used in both SPEAr and
> >> versatile express.
> >
> > They can be used in any PrimeXsys based system, and I don't see that
> > there's anything which guarantees having both a SP810 and SP804
> > together.
> >
> > There are platforms which have SP804 without SP810 - Integrator CP
> > and bcmring seem to fall into that category.
>
> I was more thinking the other way around - I think that all systems
> with an SP810 also have an SP804.
>
> I'm led to thinking this because of these registers:
>
> #define SCCTRL_TIMEREN0SEL_REFCLK (0 << 15)
> #define SCCTRL_TIMEREN0SEL_TIMCLK (1 << 15)
> #define SCCTRL_TIMEREN1SEL_REFCLK (0 << 17)
> #define SCCTRL_TIMEREN1SEL_TIMCLK (1 << 17)
>
> TIMER0 and TIMER1 seems to indicate TIMER0 and TIMER1
> of the SP804 block.
Except... there's four timers, and we may not be necessarily using timer 0
and 1. So, you'd need to know independently which are the two timers
you're using.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode
2012-02-23 9:13 [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode Viresh Kumar
2012-02-23 10:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-27 10:38 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2012-02-29 20:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-01 3:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2012-02-29 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:43:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> From: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
>
> sp810 controller can change system's working mode to various power save
> states. Introduce an API to accomplish the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h
> index e0d1c0c..df0960a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h
> @@ -14,10 +14,25 @@
> #ifndef __ASM_ARM_SP810_H
> #define __ASM_ARM_SP810_H
>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>
> /* sysctl registers offset */
> #define SCCTRL 0x000
> + #define SYS_MODE_STS_MASK (0xF << 3)
> + #define SYS_MODE_STS_SLEEP (0x0 << 3)
> + #define SYS_MODE_STS_DOZE (0x1 << 3)
> + #define SYS_MODE_STS_SLOW (0x2 << 3)
> + #define SYS_MODE_STS_NORMAL (0x4 << 3)
> +
> + #define SYS_MODE_MASK (0x7 << 0)
> + #define SYS_MODE_SLEEP (0x0 << 0)
> + #define SYS_MODE_DOZE (0x1 << 0)
> + #define SYS_MODE_SLOW (0x2 << 0)
> + #define SYS_MODE_NORMAL (0x4 << 0)
Please don't indent #defines like this, I find it abhorrent that,@least,
the '#' is not in column 1.
Also, please name these constants SCCTRL_xxx so that the prefix matches
the register which they're related to.
So, I'd much prefer these to be:
#define SCCTRL_MODE_STS_MASK (0xf << 3)
...
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode
2012-02-29 20:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2012-03-01 3:51 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2012-03-01 3:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 3/1/2012 1:44 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> > #define SCCTRL 0x000
>> > + #define SYS_MODE_STS_MASK (0xF << 3)
>> > + #define SYS_MODE_STS_SLEEP (0x0 << 3)
>> > + #define SYS_MODE_STS_DOZE (0x1 << 3)
>> > + #define SYS_MODE_STS_SLOW (0x2 << 3)
>> > + #define SYS_MODE_STS_NORMAL (0x4 << 3)
>> > +
>> > + #define SYS_MODE_MASK (0x7 << 0)
>> > + #define SYS_MODE_SLEEP (0x0 << 0)
>> > + #define SYS_MODE_DOZE (0x1 << 0)
>> > + #define SYS_MODE_SLOW (0x2 << 0)
>> > + #define SYS_MODE_NORMAL (0x4 << 0)
> Please don't indent #defines like this, I find it abhorrent that, at least,
> the '#' is not in column 1.
>
I will change it if you want, but this one looked more readable to me.
> Also, please name these constants SCCTRL_xxx so that the prefix matches
> the register which they're related to.
>
> So, I'd much prefer these to be:
>
> #define SCCTRL_MODE_STS_MASK (0xf << 3)
Sure.
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-01 3:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-23 9:13 [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode Viresh Kumar
2012-02-23 10:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-23 10:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-02-27 10:38 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-27 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-27 15:29 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-27 15:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-29 20:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-01 3:51 ` Viresh Kumar
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.