All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tony@atomide.com,
	lrg@ti.com, b-cousson@ti.com, patches@linaro.org,
	linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:41:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120227134112.GB3191@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F4B7798.6000300@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 330 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

> Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
> re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.

Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
- I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:41:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120227134112.GB3191@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F4B7798.6000300@ti.com>

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

> Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
> re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.

Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
- I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120227/b24942a0/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-27 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-27 10:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:35 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] regulator: twl: adapt twl-regulator driver to dt Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:36   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm/dts: twl: Pass regulator data from dt Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:36   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 12:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators Peter Ujfalusi
2012-02-27 12:15   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-02-27 12:31   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 12:31     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 13:41     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-02-27 13:41       ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 13:52       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-27 13:52         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-27 14:03         ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 14:03           ` Mark Brown
     [not found]           ` <20120227140356.GF3191-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-27 14:21             ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-27 14:21               ` Cousson, Benoit
     [not found]               ` <4F4B9166.7020909-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-27 14:53                 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 14:53                   ` Mark Brown
2012-02-28  5:41                   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-28  5:41                     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-28 10:18                     ` Mark Brown
2012-02-28 10:18                       ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 22:17         ` Grant Likely
2012-02-27 22:17           ` Grant Likely
     [not found]           ` <CACxGe6vU2dSpRrqd2y=ssgVsWuwpuvFtja9YcUAQA_ETWcwCYg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-27 22:24             ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-27 22:24               ` Cousson, Benoit
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-23 11:35 Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 11:35 ` Rajendra Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120227134112.GB3191@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.