All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: recent scsi patches causing 2 warnings per compiled file
@ 2012-03-29  0:16 Paul Gortmaker
  2012-03-29  3:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Gortmaker @ 2012-03-29  0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi, linux-next

Hi James,

I just noticed that the alpha (and probably other arch?) are now
getting two warnings per file compiled, which is kind of ugly.

Here is where it transitioned:

good: Mar 24:  http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5941020/

bad: Mar 26: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5968296/

Screens and screens of these appear:

drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h:166:1: warning: "__enabled_CONFIG_PM" is not defined
drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h:166:1: warning: "__enabled_CONFIG_PM_MODULE"
is not defined

Missing an include of linux/pm.h or similar, I'd guess.  Can you have
a look please?

Thanks,
Paul.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: recent scsi patches causing 2 warnings per compiled file
  2012-03-29  0:16 linux-next: recent scsi patches causing 2 warnings per compiled file Paul Gortmaker
@ 2012-03-29  3:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-03-29  3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Gortmaker; +Cc: James Bottomley, linux-scsi, linux-next

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 938 bytes --]

Hi Paul,

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:16:03 -0400 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
>
> I just noticed that the alpha (and probably other arch?) are now
> getting two warnings per file compiled, which is kind of ugly.
> 
> Here is where it transitioned:
> 
> good: Mar 24:  http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5941020/
> 
> bad: Mar 26: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5968296/
> 
> Screens and screens of these appear:
> 
> drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h:166:1: warning: "__enabled_CONFIG_PM" is not defined
> drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h:166:1: warning: "__enabled_CONFIG_PM_MODULE"
> is not defined
> 
> Missing an include of linux/pm.h or similar, I'd guess.  Can you have
> a look please?

This happens because the affected architectures do not include the pm
Kconfig.  I think it has been fixed today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-29  3:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-29  0:16 linux-next: recent scsi patches causing 2 warnings per compiled file Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-29  3:22 ` Stephen Rothwell

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.