All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] thp, memcg: split hugepage for memcg oom on cow
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:20:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120411142023.GB1789@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204092242050.27689@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:42:31PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On COW, a new hugepage is allocated and charged to the memcg.  If the
> system is oom or the charge to the memcg fails, however, the fault
> handler will return VM_FAULT_OOM which results in an oom kill.
> 
> Instead, it's possible to fallback to splitting the hugepage so that the
> COW results only in an order-0 page being allocated and charged to the
> memcg which has a higher liklihood to succeed.  This is expensive because
> the hugepage must be split in the page fault handler, but it is much
> better than unnecessarily oom killing a process.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
>  mm/huge_memory.c |    3 +++
>  mm/memory.c      |   18 +++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -950,6 +950,8 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_FALLBACK);
>  		ret = do_huge_pmd_wp_page_fallback(mm, vma, address,
>  						   pmd, orig_pmd, page, haddr);
> +		if (ret & VM_FAULT_OOM)
> +			split_huge_page(page);
>  		put_page(page);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> @@ -957,6 +959,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  
>  	if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(new_page, mm, GFP_KERNEL))) {
>  		put_page(new_page);
> +		split_huge_page(page);
>  		put_page(page);
>  		ret |= VM_FAULT_OOM;
>  		goto out;
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3489,6 +3489,7 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
>  		return hugetlb_fault(mm, vma, address, flags);
>  
> +retry:
>  	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
>  	pud = pud_alloc(mm, pgd, address);
>  	if (!pud)
> @@ -3502,13 +3503,24 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  							  pmd, flags);
>  	} else {
>  		pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmd;
> +		int ret;
> +
>  		barrier();
>  		if (pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)) {
>  			if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE &&
>  			    !pmd_write(orig_pmd) &&
> -			    !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd))
> -				return do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address,
> -							   pmd, orig_pmd);
> +			    !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd)) {
> +				ret = do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address, pmd,
> +							  orig_pmd);
> +				/*
> +				 * If COW results in an oom, the huge pmd will
> +				 * have been split, so retry the fault on the
> +				 * pte for a smaller charge.
> +				 */
> +				if (unlikely(ret & VM_FAULT_OOM))
> +					goto retry;

Can you instead put a __split_huge_page_pmd(mm, pmd) here?  It has to
redo the get-page-ref-through-pagetable dance, but it's more robust
and obvious than splitting the COW page before returning OOM in the
thp wp handler.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-11 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-04  1:56 [patch] thp, memcg: split hugepage for memcg oom on cow David Rientjes
2012-04-09  9:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10  0:23   ` David Rientjes
2012-04-10  0:43     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10  0:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10  5:41   ` David Rientjes
2012-04-10  5:42     ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2012-04-10  5:59       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-11 14:20       ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2012-04-23 23:15         ` David Rientjes
2012-04-25 21:01           ` David Rientjes
2012-04-26  9:06           ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-26 21:05             ` David Rientjes
2012-04-27  0:15               ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120411142023.GB1789@redhat.com \
    --to=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.