All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] thp, memcg: split hugepage for memcg oom on cow
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:49:09 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F838385.9070309@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204031854530.30629@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

(2012/04/04 10:56), David Rientjes wrote:

> On COW, a new hugepage is allocated and charged to the memcg.  If the
> memcg is oom, however, this charge will fail and will return VM_FAULT_OOM
> to the page fault handler which results in an oom kill.
> 
> Instead, it's possible to fallback to splitting the hugepage so that the
> COW results only in an order-0 page being charged to the memcg which has
> a higher liklihood to succeed.  This is expensive because the hugepage
> must be split in the page fault handler, but it is much better than
> unnecessarily oom killing a process.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
>  mm/huge_memory.c |    1 +
>  mm/memory.c      |   18 +++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -959,6 +959,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  
>  	if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(new_page, mm, GFP_KERNEL))) {
>  		put_page(new_page);
> +		split_huge_page(page);
>  		put_page(page);
>  		ret |= VM_FAULT_OOM;
>  		goto out;
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3489,6 +3489,7 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
>  		return hugetlb_fault(mm, vma, address, flags);
>  
> +retry:
>  	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
>  	pud = pud_alloc(mm, pgd, address);
>  	if (!pud)
> @@ -3502,13 +3503,24 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  							  pmd, flags);
>  	} else {
>  		pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmd;
> +		int ret;
> +
>  		barrier();
>  		if (pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)) {
>  			if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE &&
>  			    !pmd_write(orig_pmd) &&
> -			    !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd))
> -				return do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address,
> -							   pmd, orig_pmd);
> +			    !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd)) {
> +				ret = do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address, pmd,
> +							  orig_pmd);
> +				/*
> +				 * If COW results in an oom memcg, the huge pmd
> +				 * will already have been split, so retry the
> +				 * fault on the pte for a smaller charge.
> +				 */


IIUC, do_huge_pmd_wp_page_fallback() can return VM_FAULT_OOM. So, this check
is not related only to memcg.

> +				if (unlikely(ret & VM_FAULT_OOM))
> +					goto retry;
> +				return ret;
> +			}
>  			return 0;


Anyway, seems reasonable to me.

Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-10  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-04  1:56 [patch] thp, memcg: split hugepage for memcg oom on cow David Rientjes
2012-04-09  9:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10  0:23   ` David Rientjes
2012-04-10  0:43     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10  0:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-04-10  5:41   ` David Rientjes
2012-04-10  5:42     ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2012-04-10  5:59       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-11 14:20       ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-23 23:15         ` David Rientjes
2012-04-25 21:01           ` David Rientjes
2012-04-26  9:06           ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-26 21:05             ` David Rientjes
2012-04-27  0:15               ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F838385.9070309@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.