From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Sergio Correia <lists@uece.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>, "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>, "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> Subject: Re: [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:41:37 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120414094137.54a7f213@stein> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s10KVwL5pY=Q5hWfyUtU6CvvZZ4Bcg-fEY9dAhSL306aQ@mail.gmail.com> On Apr 14 Felipe Contreras wrote: > I already exemplified how they are very different, but here it goes > again. The patch "drm/i915: Add lock on drm_helper_resume_force_mode" > was just tagged in 3.3.2, if I had said yesterday "this patch breaks > things on my machine", then that patch would have been dropped for > 3.3.2 even though it's still on mainline--why? Because we know it's > broken, and broken patches are not supposed to land to stable. But > today, one day later, we have to wait until it's fixed in master > first. Why? > > What makes a patch droppable yesterday, but dependent on mainline today? Huh? Because "yesterday" was a review before stable release: - A buggy mainline release exists. - No buggy stable release exists. whereas "today" is after stable release: - A buggy mainline release exists. - A buggy stable release exists. (The WLAN breakage wich is being talked about was reported after release, not during review, right?) [quote re-ordered] > Again, you can repeat the same thing as much as you want, it still > doesn't answer what I have asked. Yeah, sorry for that. All the time I thought you asked why a *revert* which is applicable to mainline and stable first happens in stable. But your question was actually what the difference between - dropping a patch from a queue of candidate patches versus - adding a reverting patch to repair a defect from a previous release is. The former is still part of the decision whether a changeset which exists in mainline should be backported into stable. Somebody initially thought it should be, but others should have a look too and amend that decision if need be. Somebody reports that the change would introduce a regression. Usually, this disqualifies a patch from being applied to stable right away, without further work having to be done in stable. "Drop a stable candidate before release" is a form of "decline a submission to stable", happening late in the preparations of a stable release. The latter is when damage was done; it is now about bug fixing. This involves debugging of the regression, finding a right approach to fix it (e.g. revert), write + review + test + commit the fix, port the fix to all relevant other kernel branches, review + test + commit those ports too. "Add a reverting fix" is a form of "add a fix". You are indeed pointing to a procedural flaw here. In "add a fix" cases, stable release procedures ensure that if 3.3.3 included the revert, 3.4 will include it to, by the Linus->Greg order of commiting patches. But in the "drop a candidate before release" case, Greg and the stable reviewers do not have a similarly fool-proof procedure to ensure that the next branch point will be free of the regression. Now they need to watch closely that a fix gets into mainline ideally before the next branch point is going to be released. So there is indeed a difficulty involved with dropping patches from the candidate queue. Fortunately, it is not necessary to subject post-release reverts to the same difficulty. > This of course, has *not* been explained. Others had discussed "not adding a changeset" versus "amending an already released changeset by another changeset on top of it" already. Now I did too and apologize to everybody else for redundancy. -- Stefan Richter -=====-===-- -=-- -===- http://arcgraph.de/sr/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Subject: [ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:41:37 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120414094137.54a7f213@stein> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s10KVwL5pY=Q5hWfyUtU6CvvZZ4Bcg-fEY9dAhSL306aQ@mail.gmail.com> On Apr 14 Felipe Contreras wrote: > I already exemplified how they are very different, but here it goes > again. The patch "drm/i915: Add lock on drm_helper_resume_force_mode" > was just tagged in 3.3.2, if I had said yesterday "this patch breaks > things on my machine", then that patch would have been dropped for > 3.3.2 even though it's still on mainline--why? Because we know it's > broken, and broken patches are not supposed to land to stable. But > today, one day later, we have to wait until it's fixed in master > first. Why? > > What makes a patch droppable yesterday, but dependent on mainline today? Huh? Because "yesterday" was a review before stable release: - A buggy mainline release exists. - No buggy stable release exists. whereas "today" is after stable release: - A buggy mainline release exists. - A buggy stable release exists. (The WLAN breakage wich is being talked about was reported after release, not during review, right?) [quote re-ordered] > Again, you can repeat the same thing as much as you want, it still > doesn't answer what I have asked. Yeah, sorry for that. All the time I thought you asked why a *revert* which is applicable to mainline and stable first happens in stable. But your question was actually what the difference between - dropping a patch from a queue of candidate patches versus - adding a reverting patch to repair a defect from a previous release is. The former is still part of the decision whether a changeset which exists in mainline should be backported into stable. Somebody initially thought it should be, but others should have a look too and amend that decision if need be. Somebody reports that the change would introduce a regression. Usually, this disqualifies a patch from being applied to stable right away, without further work having to be done in stable. "Drop a stable candidate before release" is a form of "decline a submission to stable", happening late in the preparations of a stable release. The latter is when damage was done; it is now about bug fixing. This involves debugging of the regression, finding a right approach to fix it (e.g. revert), write + review + test + commit the fix, port the fix to all relevant other kernel branches, review + test + commit those ports too. "Add a reverting fix" is a form of "add a fix". You are indeed pointing to a procedural flaw here. In "add a fix" cases, stable release procedures ensure that if 3.3.3 included the revert, 3.4 will include it to, by the Linus->Greg order of commiting patches. But in the "drop a candidate before release" case, Greg and the stable reviewers do not have a similarly fool-proof procedure to ensure that the next branch point will be free of the regression. Now they need to watch closely that a fix gets into mainline ideally before the next branch point is going to be released. So there is indeed a difficulty involved with dropping patches from the candidate queue. Fortunately, it is not necessary to subject post-release reverts to the same difficulty. > This of course, has *not* been explained. Others had discussed "not adding a changeset" versus "amending an already released changeset by another changeset on top of it" already. Now I did too and apologize to everybody else for redundancy. -- Stefan Richter -=====-===-- -=-- -===- http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-14 7:42 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 270+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-04-11 23:11 [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 01/78] x86 bpf_jit: fix a bug in emitting the 16-bit immediate operand of AND Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 02/78] via-rhine: fix wait-bit inversion Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 03/78] tg3: Fix 5717 serdes powerdown problem Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 04/78] sky2: dont overwrite settings for PHY Quick link Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 05/78] rose_dev: fix memcpy-bug in rose_set_mac_address Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 06/78] net: usb: cdc_eem: fix mtu Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 07/78] Fix non TBI PHY access; a bad merge undid bug fix in a previous commit Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 08/78] ALSA: hda/realtek - Fix ADC assignment with a shared HP/Mic pin Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 09/78] ASoC: wm8994: Update WM8994 DCS calibration Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 10/78] mtd: ixp4xx: oops in ixp4xx_flash_probe Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 11/78] mtd: mips: lantiq: reintroduce support for cmdline partitions Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 12/78] mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 13/78] mtd: sst25l: initialize writebufsize Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 14/78] mtd: doc2001plus: " Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 15/78] mtd: doc2000: " Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 16/78] mtd: doc2001: " Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 17/78] mtd: docg3: " Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 18/78] mtd: block2mtd: " Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 19/78] mtd: lart: " Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 20/78] mtd: m25p80: set writebufsize Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 21/78] ACPI: Do cpufreq clamping for throttling per package v2 Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 22/78] PNPACPI: Fix device ref leaking in acpi_pnp_match Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 23/78] ACPICA: Fix regression in FADT revision checks Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 24/78] modpost: fix ALL_INIT_DATA_SECTIONS Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 25/78] genirq: Adjust irq thread affinity on IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY return value Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 26/78] tracing: Fix ftrace stack trace entries Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 27/78] tracing: Fix ent_size in trace output Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 28/78] m68k/mac: Add missing platform check before registering platform devices Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 29/78] mac80211: fix possible tid_rx->reorder_timer use after free Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 30/78] rtlwifi: rtl8192ce: rtl8192cu: rtl8192de: Fix low-gain setting when scanning Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 31/78] ath9k: fix max noise floor threshold Greg KH 2012-04-14 5:36 ` Ben Hutchings 2012-04-14 6:26 ` Rajkumar Manoharan 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 32/78] drm: Validate requested virtual size against allocated fb size Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 33/78] drm/radeon/kms: fix fans after resume Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 34/78] drm/i915: no-lvds quirk on MSI DC500 Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 35/78] drm/i915: treat src w & h as fixed point in sprite handling code Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 36/78] drm/i915: Sanitize BIOS debugging bits from PIPECONF Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 37/78] drm/i915: Add lock on drm_helper_resume_force_mode Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 38/78] drm/i915: quirk away broken OpRegion VBT Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 39/78] firmware_class: Rework usermodehelper check Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 40/78] firmware_class: Split _request_firmware() into three functions, v2 Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:10 ` [ 41/78] firmware_class: Do not warn that system is not ready from async loads Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 42/78] PM / Runtime: dont forget to wake up waitqueue on failure Greg KH 2012-04-14 5:23 ` Ben Hutchings 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 43/78] PM / Hibernate: Disable usermode helpers right before freezing tasks Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 44/78] PM / Sleep: Move disabling of usermode helpers to the freezer Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 45/78] PM / Sleep: Mitigate race between the freezer and request_firmware() Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 46/78] kgdb,debug_core: pass the breakpoint struct instead of address and memory Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 47/78] kgdbts: Fix kernel oops with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 48/78] kgdbts: (1 of 2) fix single step awareness to work correctly with SMP Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 49/78] kgdbts: (2 " Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 50/78] x86,kgdb: Fix DEBUG_RODATA limitation using text_poke() Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 51/78] CIFS: Fix VFS lock usage for oplocked files Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 52/78] USB: ohci-at91: fix vbus_pin_active_low handling Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 53/78] ARM: at91/USB host: specify and handle properly vbus_pin_active_low Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 54/78] mmc: sdio: Use empty system suspend/resume callbacks at the bus level Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 55/78] mmc: sdhci-dove: Fix compile error by including module.h Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 56/78] mmc: atmel-mci: correct data timeout computation Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 57/78] tcm_fc: Add abort flag for gracefully handling exchange timeout Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 58/78] tcm_fc: Do not free tpg structure during wq allocation failure Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 59/78] sysctl: fix write access to dmesg_restrict/kptr_restrict Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 60/78] regmap: prevent division by zero in rbtree_show Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 61/78] modpost: Fix modpost license checking of vmlinux.o Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 62/78] mfd: Fix section mismatch warning for da9052-spi Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 63/78] android, lowmemorykiller: remove task handoff notifier Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 64/78] TOMOYO: Fix mount flags checking order Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 65/78] iwlegacy: do not nulify il->vif on reset Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 66/78] Revert "x86/ioapic: Add register level checks to detect bogus io-apic entries" Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 67/78] acer-wmi: No wifi rfkill on Sony machines Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 68/78] Fix length of buffer copied in __nfs4_get_acl_uncached Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 69/78] sched/x86: Fix overflow in cyc2ns_offset Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 70/78] mfd: Clear twl6030 IRQ status register only once Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 71/78] USB: Add Motorola Rokr E6 Id to the USBNet driver "zaurus" Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 72/78] ioat: fix size of completion for Xen Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 73/78] [media] uvcvideo: Fix race-related crash in uvc_video_clock_update() Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 74/78] ASoC: ak4642: fixup: mute needs +1 step Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 75/78] ASoC: tegra: fix i2s compilation when !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 76/78] media: dvb_frontend: regression fix: userspace ABI broken for xine Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 77/78] media: dvb-core: fix DVBFE_ALGO_HW retune bug Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:11 ` [ 78/78] cred: copy_process() should clear child->replacement_session_keyring Greg KH 2012-04-11 23:59 ` [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review Sergio Correia 2012-04-11 23:59 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sergio Correia 2012-04-11 23:59 ` Sergio Correia 2012-04-11 23:59 ` Sergio Correia 2012-04-12 0:29 ` Greg KH 2012-04-12 0:29 ` [ath9k-devel] " Greg KH 2012-04-12 0:29 ` Greg KH 2012-04-12 0:57 ` Sergio Correia 2012-04-12 0:57 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sergio Correia 2012-04-12 0:57 ` Sergio Correia 2012-04-12 1:03 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 1:03 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 1:13 ` Greg KH 2012-04-12 1:13 ` [ath9k-devel] " Greg KH 2012-04-12 1:13 ` Greg KH 2012-04-12 13:32 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 13:32 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 14:46 ` Greg KH 2012-04-12 14:46 ` [ath9k-devel] " Greg KH 2012-04-12 14:46 ` Greg KH 2012-04-12 16:49 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 16:49 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 17:24 ` Adrian Chadd 2012-04-12 17:24 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd 2012-04-12 17:24 ` Adrian Chadd 2012-04-12 18:43 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 18:43 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 18:56 ` Jonathan Nieder 2012-04-12 18:56 ` [ath9k-devel] " Jonathan Nieder 2012-04-12 21:34 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 21:34 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 21:43 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-12 21:43 ` [ath9k-devel] " Willy Tarreau 2012-04-12 20:07 ` Greg KH 2012-04-12 20:07 ` [ath9k-devel] " Greg KH 2012-04-12 20:07 ` Greg KH 2012-04-12 20:52 ` Sven-Haegar Koch 2012-04-12 20:52 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sven-Haegar Koch 2012-04-13 8:57 ` Stefan Richter 2012-04-13 8:57 ` [ath9k-devel] " Stefan Richter 2012-04-13 10:29 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-13 10:29 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-13 13:42 ` Stefan Richter 2012-04-13 13:42 ` [ath9k-devel] " Stefan Richter 2012-04-13 14:01 ` Stefan Richter 2012-04-13 14:01 ` [ath9k-devel] " Stefan Richter 2012-04-13 22:38 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-13 22:38 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-13 23:05 ` Jonathan Nieder 2012-04-13 23:05 ` [ath9k-devel] " Jonathan Nieder 2012-04-13 23:18 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-13 23:18 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 5:44 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-14 5:44 ` [ath9k-devel] " Willy Tarreau 2012-04-14 5:44 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-14 15:43 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 15:43 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 16:02 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-14 16:02 ` [ath9k-devel] " Willy Tarreau 2012-04-14 9:10 ` Stefan Richter 2012-04-14 9:10 ` [ath9k-devel] " Stefan Richter 2012-04-14 15:52 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 15:52 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 18:08 ` Stefan Richter 2012-04-14 18:08 ` [ath9k-devel] " Stefan Richter 2012-04-14 7:41 ` Stefan Richter [this message] 2012-04-14 7:41 ` Stefan Richter 2012-04-14 15:29 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 15:29 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 15:57 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-14 15:57 ` [ath9k-devel] " Willy Tarreau 2012-04-14 19:33 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 19:33 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 19:58 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-14 19:58 ` [ath9k-devel] " Willy Tarreau 2012-04-14 17:55 ` Stefan Richter 2012-04-14 17:55 ` [ath9k-devel] " Stefan Richter 2012-04-14 19:21 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 19:21 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 21:21 ` Stefan Richter 2012-04-14 21:21 ` [ath9k-devel] " Stefan Richter 2012-04-14 22:09 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 22:09 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 22:47 ` Stefan Richter 2012-04-14 22:47 ` [ath9k-devel] " Stefan Richter 2012-04-14 22:56 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 22:56 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 23:06 ` Adrian Chadd 2012-04-14 23:06 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd 2012-04-13 19:08 ` Peter Stuge 2012-04-13 19:08 ` Peter Stuge 2012-04-13 22:53 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-13 22:53 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 6:01 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-14 6:01 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-16 16:27 ` Greg KH 2012-04-16 16:27 ` Greg KH 2012-04-16 20:11 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-16 20:11 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-16 20:58 ` Greg KH 2012-04-16 20:58 ` Greg KH 2012-04-16 20:58 ` Greg KH 2012-04-16 21:18 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-16 21:18 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-16 21:27 ` Greg KH 2012-04-16 21:27 ` Greg KH 2012-04-16 21:27 ` Greg KH 2012-04-16 21:44 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-16 21:44 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-16 22:34 ` Peter Stuge 2012-04-16 22:34 ` Peter Stuge 2012-04-17 5:24 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-17 5:24 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-17 5:24 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-16 21:50 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-16 21:50 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-16 21:54 ` Don deJuan 2012-04-16 21:54 ` Don deJuan 2012-04-16 22:02 ` Don deJuan 2012-04-16 22:02 ` Don deJuan 2012-04-16 21:39 ` Don deJuan 2012-04-16 21:39 ` Don deJuan 2012-04-12 18:40 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-12 18:40 ` [ath9k-devel] " Willy Tarreau 2012-04-12 18:40 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-12 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds 2012-04-12 19:05 ` [ath9k-devel] " Linus Torvalds 2012-04-12 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds 2012-04-12 21:20 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 21:20 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 21:34 ` Linus Torvalds 2012-04-12 21:34 ` [ath9k-devel] " Linus Torvalds 2012-04-12 21:44 ` Linus Torvalds 2012-04-12 21:44 ` [ath9k-devel] " Linus Torvalds 2012-04-12 22:02 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2012-04-12 22:02 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2012-04-12 22:04 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 22:04 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds 2012-04-12 22:07 ` [ath9k-devel] " Linus Torvalds 2012-04-12 22:29 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 22:29 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar 2012-04-14 10:47 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ingo Molnar 2012-04-14 15:59 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 15:59 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-15 6:51 ` Ingo Molnar 2012-04-15 6:51 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ingo Molnar 2012-04-15 17:15 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-15 17:15 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-15 17:29 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-15 17:29 ` [ath9k-devel] " Willy Tarreau 2012-04-15 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds 2012-04-15 17:49 ` [ath9k-devel] " Linus Torvalds 2012-04-15 22:12 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-15 22:12 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-16 5:32 ` Ingo Molnar 2012-04-16 5:32 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ingo Molnar 2012-04-16 20:25 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-16 20:25 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-16 21:08 ` Arend van Spriel 2012-04-16 21:08 ` [ath9k-devel] " Arend van Spriel 2012-04-16 5:39 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-16 5:39 ` [ath9k-devel] " Willy Tarreau 2012-04-16 6:38 ` Ingo Molnar 2012-04-16 6:38 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ingo Molnar 2012-04-12 22:12 ` David Miller 2012-04-12 22:12 ` [ath9k-devel] " David Miller 2012-04-12 22:58 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 22:58 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-13 5:34 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-13 5:34 ` [ath9k-devel] " Willy Tarreau 2012-04-13 10:04 ` Felipe Contreras 2012-04-13 10:04 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 21:39 ` Willy Tarreau 2012-04-12 21:39 ` [ath9k-devel] " Willy Tarreau 2012-04-12 22:02 ` Jesper Juhl 2012-04-12 22:02 ` [ath9k-devel] " Jesper Juhl 2012-04-12 19:57 ` Alexander Holler 2012-04-12 19:57 ` [ath9k-devel] " Alexander Holler 2012-04-12 20:06 ` Greg KH 2012-04-12 20:06 ` [ath9k-devel] " Greg KH 2012-04-12 20:30 ` Alexander Holler 2012-04-12 20:30 ` [ath9k-devel] " Alexander Holler 2012-04-12 22:31 ` Greg KH 2012-04-12 22:31 ` [ath9k-devel] " Greg KH 2012-04-12 4:16 ` Heinz Diehl 2012-04-12 4:16 ` [ath9k-devel] " Heinz Diehl
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20120414094137.54a7f213@stein \ --to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \ --cc=adrian@freebsd.org \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \ --cc=ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \ --cc=c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com \ --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \ --cc=lists@uece.net \ --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.