From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: Steffen Sledz <sledz@dresearch-fe.de>
Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org, Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
Subject: Re: meta-ti layer confusion
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:20:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120420132050.GA3783@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F910E4F.9000800@dresearch-fe.de>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:20:47AM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> Our company is working on a new TI DM814x based hardware currently.
>
> That's a really hard job, because the TI linux support is not really "optimal". But that's not the primary cause for my message.
>
> [1] lists two TI BSP layers [2],[3] each one claiming to be "The official OpenEmbedded/Yocto BSP layer for Texas Instruments platforms.".
>
> A look into them shows that they are not identically. At the moment they differ in two commits ([3] is ahead of [2]). In the last days these differences where much bigger.
>
> So what is the intention for these two "offical" layers?
>
> Which one should we use? And why?
>
> BTW: Is anyone else out there working on a TI DM814x/DM816x hardware?
>
> Regards,
> Steffen
>
> [1] <http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/LayerIndex>
> [2] <http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/>
> [3] <https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/meta-ti>
They are the same. Or more appropriately, there is just one official meta-ti
layer, it's just mirrored in several places. The one on yoctoproject.org[2] is
considered the official mirror and that's what you should use. If you are
subscribed to this list, you should have seen Koen posting 2 patches for
review yesterday, which he has staged to his working copy on github[3] -
that's the difference in 2 commits. They shouldn't have been pushed to the
master branch though, until they are accepted...
--
Denys
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-20 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-20 7:20 meta-ti layer confusion Steffen Sledz
2012-04-20 13:20 ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
2012-04-20 13:47 ` Steffen Sledz
2012-04-25 6:08 ` Steffen Sledz
2012-04-25 6:19 ` Koen Kooi
2012-04-25 7:49 ` Steffen Sledz
2012-05-04 12:53 ` Steffen Sledz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120420132050.GA3783@denix.org \
--to=denis@denix.org \
--cc=denys@ti.com \
--cc=meta-ti@yoctoproject.org \
--cc=sledz@dresearch-fe.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.