From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 3/7] DRM: add sdrm layer for general embedded system support Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:20:49 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120420152048.GC6828@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120420151518.GR3852@pengutronix.de> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:15:18PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:25:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > This sounds an awful lot like how ASoC hangs together... > Very much, yes. In ASoC and DRM we both have several physical devices spread > around the SoC which form a logical device. I assume that before ASoC existed > also everyone had a single PCI device which could be used to collect the > information together. Yeah, it's a similar issue - on PC hardware we tend to have a single integrated device which does everything (at least from the point of view of the outside world, physically things may sometimes be split). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120420/61d9507c/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] DRM: add sdrm layer for general embedded system support Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:20:49 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120420152048.GC6828@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120420151518.GR3852@pengutronix.de> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 653 bytes --] On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:15:18PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:25:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > This sounds an awful lot like how ASoC hangs together... > Very much, yes. In ASoC and DRM we both have several physical devices spread > around the SoC which form a logical device. I assume that before ASoC existed > also everyone had a single PCI device which could be used to collect the > information together. Yeah, it's a similar issue - on PC hardware we tend to have a single integrated device which does everything (at least from the point of view of the outside world, physically things may sometimes be split). [-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --] _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-20 15:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-04-11 15:33 [RFC] DRM helpers for embedded systems Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm: remove legacy mode_group handling Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm: make gamma_set optional Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] DRM: add sdrm layer for general embedded system support Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 20:22 ` Alan Cox 2012-04-11 20:22 ` Alan Cox 2012-04-12 8:58 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-12 8:58 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-20 10:02 ` Dave Airlie 2012-04-20 10:02 ` Dave Airlie 2012-04-20 12:38 ` Thierry Reding 2012-04-20 12:38 ` Thierry Reding 2012-04-20 13:20 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-20 13:20 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-20 14:25 ` Mark Brown 2012-04-20 14:25 ` Mark Brown 2012-04-20 14:49 ` Thierry Reding 2012-04-20 14:49 ` Thierry Reding 2012-04-20 15:06 ` Mark Brown 2012-04-20 15:06 ` Mark Brown 2012-04-20 15:13 ` Thierry Reding 2012-04-20 15:13 ` Thierry Reding 2012-04-20 15:15 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-20 15:15 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-20 15:20 ` Mark Brown [this message] 2012-04-20 15:20 ` Mark Brown 2012-04-20 13:10 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-20 13:10 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-20 13:33 ` Daniel Vetter 2012-04-20 13:33 ` Daniel Vetter 2012-04-21 8:18 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-21 8:18 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] DRM: Add sdrm 1:1 encoder - connector helper Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] DRM: add i.MX kms simple driver Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM i.MX27 pcm038: Add sdrm support Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] DRM: add PXA kms simple driver Sascha Hauer 2012-04-11 15:33 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20120420152048.GC6828@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \ --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.