All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] lglock: remove online variants of lock
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 05:50:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120508045044.GJ22082@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87txzrcoge.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 01:29:45PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Optimizing the slow paths adds a lot of complexity.  If you need to
> grab every lock often, you have other problems.

Applied, but I'm not too happy about the situation with vfsmount_lock ;-/
On kernels built for a lot of possible CPUs the loss of ..._online()
versions will get painful.  OTOH, we can always put the map + single
spinlock + single notifier into lglock.c and reproduce the old logics.
I'll do a patch along those lines and put it on a separate branch;
then we'll be able to test and compare.

Contention from cpu map spinlock becoming shared between different
lglocks (all two of them) is not an issue - we never use the
files_lock one anyway (there we can't use _online variants).

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-08  4:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-27 23:22 [PATCH] cpumask: fix lg_lock/br_lock Rusty Russell
2012-02-27 23:53 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-27 23:53   ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-28  8:43   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-28 11:25     ` Andi Kleen
2012-02-28 12:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-28 21:27     ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-29  5:44       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-29  9:17         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-29 11:12           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  7:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-01  9:15               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  9:45                 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-01  9:56                   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:12             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:24               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:12               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:15               ` [PATCH 1/3] CPU hotplug: Fix issues with callback registration Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:27                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:15                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:16               ` [PATCH 2/3] CPU hotplug, arch/powerpc: Fix CPU hotplug " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:28                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:16                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:18               ` [PATCH 3/3] CPU hotplug, arch/sparc: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:30                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-01  8:18                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-29  8:29       ` [PATCH] cpumask: fix lg_lock/br_lock Ingo Molnar
2012-02-29  8:58         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-29  9:32           ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-28 11:24   ` Andi Kleen
2012-03-05  7:02     ` Rusty Russell
2012-03-05  7:03     ` [PATCH 1/3] lglock: remove online variants of lock Rusty Russell
2012-04-20 11:12       ` Nick Piggin
2012-03-05  7:04     ` [PATCH 2/3] brlocks/lglocks: API cleanups Rusty Russell
2012-03-05  7:05     ` [PATCH 3/3] brlocks/lglocks: turn into functions Rusty Russell
2012-04-20 11:21       ` Nick Piggin
2012-05-07  3:39         ` Rusty Russell
2012-05-07  5:46           ` Al Viro
2012-05-08  3:59             ` [PATCH 1/3] lglock: remove online variants of lock Rusty Russell
2012-05-08  4:50               ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-05-08  6:12                 ` Rusty Russell
2012-05-08  4:02             ` [PATCH 2/3] brlocks/lglocks: API cleanups Rusty Russell
2012-05-08  4:02             ` [PATCH 3/3] brlocks/lglocks: turn into functions Rusty Russell
2012-05-09  7:35           ` Nick Piggin
2012-05-09  7:35             ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120508045044.GJ22082@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.