From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Apelete Seketeli <apelete@seketeli.net>
Cc: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org,
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gtk+: Regenerate no-demos.patch and update recipe
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:34:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120619063448.GO3178@jama.jama.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120619060703.GA4845@hermes>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3373 bytes --]
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:07:03AM +0200, Apelete Seketeli wrote:
> Le 19-Jun-12, Martin Jansa a écrit:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:42:10AM +0200, Apelete Seketeli wrote:
> > > This fix regenerates the gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch file because the
> > > targeted Makefile.am file changed since gtk+-2.10.1.
> > > The gtk+_2.20.1.bb recipe is also updated to fix an issue where
> > > no-demos.patch was not taken into account during the do_patch() stage.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Apelete Seketeli <apelete@seketeli.net>
> > > ---
> > > recipes/gtk+/gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch | 7 ++++---
> > > recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.1.bb | 3 +--
> > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/recipes/gtk+/gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch b/recipes/gtk+/gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch
> > > index 0fc4c48..ac0730d 100644
> > > --- a/recipes/gtk+/gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch
> > > +++ b/recipes/gtk+/gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch
> > > @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
> > > ---- gtk+-2.10.1/Makefile.am.orig 2006-08-08 12:37:30.000000000 +0100
> > > -+++ gtk+-2.10.1/Makefile.am 2006-08-08 12:37:48.000000000 +0100
> > > -@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > > +--- gtk+-2.20.1/Makefile.am.orig 2012-06-18 22:40:19.348040648 +0200
> > > ++++ gtk+-2.20.1/Makefile.am 2012-06-18 22:40:41.272149318 +0200
> > > +@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> > > ## Makefile.am for GTK+
> > > + include $(top_srcdir)/Makefile.decl
> > >
> > > -SRC_SUBDIRS = gdk-pixbuf gdk gtk modules demos tests perf contrib
> > > +SRC_SUBDIRS = gdk-pixbuf gdk gtk modules tests perf contrib
> > > diff --git a/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.1.bb b/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.1.bb
> > > index 9cffee1..6e3c291 100644
> > > --- a/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.1.bb
> > > +++ b/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.1.bb
> > > @@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
> > > require gtk+.inc
> > >
> > > -SRC_URI_append_virtclass-native = " file://no-demos.patch \
> > > -"
> > > SRC_URI_append = "file://gtk-dnd-grab-deadlock-fix.patch \
> > > file://cross-nm.patch \
> > > file://xkb-ifdef.patch \
> > > + file://no-demos.patch \
> >
> > I guess this was because demos were working for target case and were
> > intentionally disabled only for native..
>
> In my oe setup I did not build gtk+-native. I added gtk+-native to the
> ASSUME_PROVIDED list in local.conf instead, and installed
> libgtk2.0-dev on my host machine.
> As a consequence, I faced this gtk+ issue while baking a target
> package, not a native one.
>
> Do you mean I shouldn't have fixed the issue the way I did ? What
> would be the best course of action then ?
As you can see in
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/recipes/gtk+?id=a3b0920d0cc2cecac9eea4993ad18a64b207d7af
and
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/recipes/gtk+?id=a3b0920d0cc2cecac9eea4993ad18a64b207d7af
no-demos.patch is intentionally applied only for gtk+-native and even
correctly packaged for target. So if you have issues building
gtk+_2.20.1.bb then rebasing gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch is right, but
moving that patch from SRC_URI_append_virtclass-native to SRC_URI_append
is wrong.
BTW: I'm not using oe-classic at all, and I'm still reading oe-devel ML, please
don't put me to To: directly, Thanks.
Cheers,
>
> Regards.
> --
> Apelete
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-19 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-18 23:42 [PATCH 0/1] gtk+: Regenerate no-demos.patch and update recipe Apelete Seketeli
2012-06-18 23:42 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Apelete Seketeli
2012-06-19 5:29 ` Martin Jansa
2012-06-19 6:07 ` Apelete Seketeli
2012-06-19 6:34 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2012-06-19 19:56 ` Apelete Seketeli
2012-06-19 21:49 ` [oe-classic][gtk+][PATCH v2 0/2] gtk+: fix build issue by not building demo programs Apelete Seketeli
2012-06-19 21:52 ` [oe-classic][gtk+][PATCH v2 1/2] gtk+: Rebase gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch Apelete Seketeli
2012-06-19 21:55 ` [oe-classic][gtk+][PATCH v2 2/2] gtk+: Add no-test-inline-pixbufs.patch to gtk+-2.20.1 Apelete Seketeli
2012-06-27 16:30 ` Apelete Seketeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120619063448.GO3178@jama.jama.net \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=apelete@seketeli.net \
--cc=kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.