All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	yinghai@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	gorcunov@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, x2apic: limit the vector reservation to the user specified mask
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:04:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120621090451.GD2223@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340149411-2972-2-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:43:31PM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> For the x2apic cluster mode, vector for an interrupt is currently reserved on
> all the cpu's that are part of the x2apic cluster. But the interrupts will
> be routed only to the cluster (derived from the first cpu in the mask) members
> specified in the mask. So there is no need to reserve the vector in the unused
> cluster members.
> 
> Modify __assign_irq_vector() to reserve the vectors based on the user
> specified irq destination mask and the corresponding vector domain specified
> by the apic driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h           |   14 +++++++++---
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_noop.c      |    5 +++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c        |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c |    8 ++++--
>  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> index b37fa12..7746acb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> @@ -306,7 +306,9 @@ struct apic {
>  	unsigned long (*check_apicid_used)(physid_mask_t *map, int apicid);
>  	unsigned long (*check_apicid_present)(int apicid);
>  
> -	void (*vector_allocation_domain)(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask);
> +	void (*vector_allocation_domain)(const struct cpumask *mask,
> +					 struct cpumask *retmask,
> +					 const struct cpumask *prevmask);
>  	void (*init_apic_ldr)(void);
>  
>  	void (*ioapic_phys_id_map)(physid_mask_t *phys_map, physid_mask_t *retmap);
> @@ -615,7 +617,9 @@ default_cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
>  			       unsigned int *apicid);
>  
>  static inline void
> -flat_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)
> +flat_vector_allocation_domain(const struct cpumask *mask,
> +			      struct cpumask *retmask,
> +			      const struct cpumask *prevmask)
>  {
>  	/* Careful. Some cpus do not strictly honor the set of cpus
>  	 * specified in the interrupt destination when using lowest
> @@ -630,9 +634,11 @@ flat_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)
>  }
>  
>  static inline void
> -default_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)
> +default_vector_allocation_domain(const struct cpumask *mask,
> +				 struct cpumask *retmask,
> +				 const struct cpumask *prevmask)
>  {
> -	cpumask_copy(retmask, cpumask_of(cpu));
> +	cpumask_copy(retmask, cpumask_of(cpumask_first(retmask)));
>  }
>  
>  static inline unsigned long default_check_apicid_used(physid_mask_t *map, int apicid)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_noop.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_noop.c
> index 08c337b..847ece1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_noop.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_noop.c
> @@ -100,8 +100,11 @@ static unsigned long noop_check_apicid_present(int bit)
>  	return physid_isset(bit, phys_cpu_present_map);
>  }
>  
> -static void noop_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)
> +static void noop_vector_allocation_domain(const struct cpumask *mask,
> +					  struct cpumask *retmask,
> +					  const struct cpumask *prevmask)
>  {
> +	int cpu = cpumask_first(retmask);
>  	if (cpu != 0)
>  		pr_warning("APIC: Vector allocated for non-BSP cpu\n");
>  	cpumask_copy(retmask, cpumask_of(cpu));
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> index 7a945f8..0a55eb8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -1097,6 +1097,22 @@ void unlock_vector_lock(void)
>  	raw_spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * New cpu mask using the vector is a subset of the current in use mask.
> + * So cleanup the vector allocation for the members that are not used anymore.
> + */
> +static inline int
> +cleanup_unused_subset(struct cpumask *mask, struct irq_cfg *cfg)
> +{
> +	if (!cpumask_equal(mask, cfg->domain)) {
> +		cpumask_andnot(cfg->old_domain, cfg->domain, mask);
> +		cfg->move_in_progress = 1;
> +		cpumask_and(cfg->domain, cfg->domain, mask);
> +	}
> +	free_cpumask_var(mask);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

Adding to 1st Yinghai's comment, this function does not appear needed at all...

>  static int
>  __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct irq_cfg *cfg, const struct cpumask *mask)
>  {
> @@ -1126,10 +1142,9 @@ __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct irq_cfg *cfg, const struct cpumask *mask)
>  	old_vector = cfg->vector;
>  	if (old_vector) {
>  		cpumask_and(tmp_mask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
> -		if (cpumask_subset(tmp_mask, cfg->domain)) {
> -			free_cpumask_var(tmp_mask);
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> +		apic->vector_allocation_domain(mask, tmp_mask, cfg->domain);
> +		if (cpumask_subset(tmp_mask, cfg->domain))
> +			return cleanup_unused_subset(tmp_mask, cfg);

...but if you decide to leave cleanup_unused_subset() then cpumask_subset()
check is better to move inside the function while free_cpumask_var() move
out.

>  	}
>  
>  	/* Only try and allocate irqs on cpus that are present */
> @@ -1137,15 +1152,12 @@ __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct irq_cfg *cfg, const struct cpumask *mask)
>  	cpumask_clear(cfg->old_domain);
>  	cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
>  	while (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
> -		int new_cpu;
> -		int vector, offset;
> +		int new_cpu, vector, offset;
>  
> -		apic->vector_allocation_domain(cpu, tmp_mask);
> -
> -		if (cpumask_subset(tmp_mask, cfg->domain)) {
> -			free_cpumask_var(tmp_mask);
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> +		cpumask_copy(tmp_mask, cpumask_of(cpu));
> +		apic->vector_allocation_domain(mask, tmp_mask, cfg->domain);

I might be missing the point.. in the two lines above you copy a cpumask to
tmp_mask, then scan it in vector_allocation_domain() just to find the cpu
which you already know. Why not just pass cpu rather then cpumask_of(cpu)?

> +		if (cpumask_subset(tmp_mask, cfg->domain))
> +			return cleanup_unused_subset(tmp_mask, cfg);
>  
>  		vector = current_vector;
>  		offset = current_offset;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c
> index b5d889b..4d49512 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c
> @@ -212,10 +212,12 @@ static int x2apic_cluster_probe(void)
>  /*
>   * Each x2apic cluster is an allocation domain.
>   */
> -static void cluster_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)
> +static void cluster_vector_allocation_domain(const struct cpumask *mask,
> +					     struct cpumask *retmask,
> +					     const struct cpumask *prevmask)
>  {
> -	cpumask_clear(retmask);
> -	cpumask_copy(retmask, per_cpu(cpus_in_cluster, cpu));
> +	int cpu = cpumask_first(retmask);
> +	cpumask_and(retmask, mask, per_cpu(cpus_in_cluster, cpu));
>  }
>  
>  static struct apic apic_x2apic_cluster = {
> -- 
> 1.7.6.5
> 

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-18 10:26 [PATCH 2/3] x86: x2apic/cluster: Make use of lowest priority delivery mode Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-18 14:41 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-18 15:42   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-18 15:51     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-19 10:47       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-21  7:11         ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21  9:46           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-19 20:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-21  8:13   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 23:02     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-21 23:33       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-22  9:36         ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 23:44     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 23:58       ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 23:58         ` [PATCH 2/2] x2apic, cluster: use all the members of one cluster specified in the smp_affinity mask for the interrupt desintation Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22  7:04           ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-22  7:34             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 17:21             ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 17:39               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 17:42                 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 17:45                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 20:03           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-06 15:04           ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/x2apic/cluster: Use all the members of one cluster specified in the smp_affinity mask for the interrupt destination tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 22:21             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-06 23:14               ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 15:03         ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/irq: Update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 15:31           ` Robert Richter
2012-08-07 15:41             ` do_IRQ: 1.55 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) Borislav Petkov
2012-08-07 16:24               ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 17:28                 ` Robert Richter
2012-08-07 17:47                   ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 17:45                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-07 20:57                   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-07 22:39                     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-08  8:58                       ` Robert Richter
2012-08-08 11:04                         ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-08 19:16                           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-14 17:02                             ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, apic: fix broken legacy interrupts in the logical apic mode tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 17:20         ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-06 23:02           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-16  0:25           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-18  9:17             ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-19  0:51               ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-19 23:43                 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, apic: optimize cpu traversal in __assign_irq_vector() using domain membership Suresh Siddha
2012-06-19 23:43                   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, x2apic: limit the vector reservation to the user specified mask Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20  5:56                     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-21  9:04                     ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2012-06-21 21:51                       ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20  5:53                   ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, apic: optimize cpu traversal in __assign_irq_vector() using domain membership Yinghai Lu
2012-06-21  8:31                   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-21 21:53                     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20  0:18               ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Suresh Siddha
2012-06-21 11:00                 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-21 21:58                   ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 10:12       ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: x2apic/cluster: Make use of lowest priority delivery mode Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21  8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21  9:36   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 12:40     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 14:48       ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 14:59         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 15:22           ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 15:34           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-21 15:36           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-21 18:07             ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 18:18               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-21 18:37                 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 19:30                   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 19:15             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 19:56               ` Suresh Siddha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120621090451.GD2223@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=agordeev@redhat.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.