All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: yinghai@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	gorcunov@openvz.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:00:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120621110055.GE2223@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340151523.3696.27.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 05:18:42PM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 17:51 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> BTW, there is still one open that I would like to address. How to handle
> the vector pressure during boot etc (as the default vector assignment
> specifies all online cpus) when there are lot interrupt sources but
> fewer x2apic clusters (like one or two socket server case).
> 
> We should be able to do something like the appended. Any better
> suggestions? I don't want to add boot parameters to limit the x2apic
> cluster membership etc (to fewer than 16 logical cpu's) if possible.

This cpu_online_mask approach should work IMO. Although it looks little bit
hacky for me. May be we could start with default_vector_allocation_domain()
and explicitly switch to cluster_vector_allocation_domain() once booted?

As of boot parameters, I can think of multi-pass walk thru a cpumask to find a
free cluster => core => sibling. In worst case I can imagine a vector space
defragmentator. But nothing really small to avoid current code reshake.

Also, how heavy the vector pressure actually is?

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-18 10:26 [PATCH 2/3] x86: x2apic/cluster: Make use of lowest priority delivery mode Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-18 14:41 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-18 15:42   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-18 15:51     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-19 10:47       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-21  7:11         ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21  9:46           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-19 20:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-21  8:13   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 23:02     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-21 23:33       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-22  9:36         ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 23:44     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 23:58       ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 23:58         ` [PATCH 2/2] x2apic, cluster: use all the members of one cluster specified in the smp_affinity mask for the interrupt desintation Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22  7:04           ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-22  7:34             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 17:21             ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 17:39               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 17:42                 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 17:45                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 20:03           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-06 15:04           ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/x2apic/cluster: Use all the members of one cluster specified in the smp_affinity mask for the interrupt destination tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 22:21             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-06 23:14               ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 15:03         ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/irq: Update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 15:31           ` Robert Richter
2012-08-07 15:41             ` do_IRQ: 1.55 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) Borislav Petkov
2012-08-07 16:24               ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 17:28                 ` Robert Richter
2012-08-07 17:47                   ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 17:45                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-07 20:57                   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-07 22:39                     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-08  8:58                       ` Robert Richter
2012-08-08 11:04                         ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-08 19:16                           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-14 17:02                             ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, apic: fix broken legacy interrupts in the logical apic mode tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 17:20         ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-06 23:02           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-16  0:25           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-18  9:17             ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-19  0:51               ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-19 23:43                 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, apic: optimize cpu traversal in __assign_irq_vector() using domain membership Suresh Siddha
2012-06-19 23:43                   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, x2apic: limit the vector reservation to the user specified mask Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20  5:56                     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-21  9:04                     ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-21 21:51                       ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20  5:53                   ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, apic: optimize cpu traversal in __assign_irq_vector() using domain membership Yinghai Lu
2012-06-21  8:31                   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-21 21:53                     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20  0:18               ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Suresh Siddha
2012-06-21 11:00                 ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2012-06-21 21:58                   ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 10:12       ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: x2apic/cluster: Make use of lowest priority delivery mode Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21  8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21  9:36   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 12:40     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 14:48       ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 14:59         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 15:22           ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 15:34           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-21 15:36           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-21 18:07             ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 18:18               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-21 18:37                 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 19:30                   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 19:15             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 19:56               ` Suresh Siddha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120621110055.GE2223@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=agordeev@redhat.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.