From: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Cc: Richard Zhao <linuxzsc-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c i.MX: Fix divider table Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 08:52:50 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120706005249.GA26888@b20223-02.ap.freescale.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120705160153.GT30009-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 06:01:53PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:52:39PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Measurements on i.MX1 and i.MX53 have shown that the divider values > > > in the datasheets are wrong. the values from first, third and fourth > > > column were all measured to be 8 higher than in the datasheet. It > > > should be safe to assume that the SoCs between i.MX1 and i.MX53 behave > > > the same as the i2c unit is unchanged since the i.MX1. > > We may need to check with IC guys? Or you've done? > > I don't have contact to the IC guys. Could you do this? I'd be > interested in the results. Sure, but it may be slow, as you know, many people are in summer break. Thanks Richard > > Sascha > > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: richard.zhao@freescale.com (Richard Zhao) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] i2c i.MX: Fix divider table Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 08:52:50 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120706005249.GA26888@b20223-02.ap.freescale.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120705160153.GT30009@pengutronix.de> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 06:01:53PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:52:39PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Measurements on i.MX1 and i.MX53 have shown that the divider values > > > in the datasheets are wrong. the values from first, third and fourth > > > column were all measured to be 8 higher than in the datasheet. It > > > should be safe to assume that the SoCs between i.MX1 and i.MX53 behave > > > the same as the i2c unit is unchanged since the i.MX1. > > We may need to check with IC guys? Or you've done? > > I don't have contact to the IC guys. Could you do this? I'd be > interested in the results. Sure, but it may be slow, as you know, many people are in summer break. Thanks Richard > > Sascha > > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-06 0:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-07-05 13:10 [PATCH] i2c i.MX: Fix divider table Sascha Hauer 2012-07-05 13:10 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-07-05 14:23 ` Baruch Siach 2012-07-05 14:23 ` Baruch Siach [not found] ` <1341493826-13861-1-git-send-email-s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-05 14:52 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-05 14:52 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-05 16:01 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-07-05 16:01 ` Sascha Hauer [not found] ` <20120705160153.GT30009-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-06 0:52 ` Richard Zhao [this message] 2012-07-06 0:52 ` Richard Zhao [not found] ` <20120706005249.GA26888-iWYTGMXpHj9ITqJhDdzsOjpauB2SiJktrE5yTffgRl4@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-06 6:28 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-07-06 6:28 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-07-06 17:41 ` Troy Kisky [not found] ` <20120706062852.GZ30009-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-11 6:01 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-11 6:01 ` Richard Zhao [not found] ` <20120711060121.GB30055-iWYTGMXpHj9ITqJhDdzsOjpauB2SiJktrE5yTffgRl4@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-11 18:38 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-07-11 18:38 ` Sascha Hauer [not found] ` <20120711183838.GM30009-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-11 19:11 ` Troy Kisky 2012-07-11 19:11 ` Troy Kisky [not found] ` <4FFDCFDB.7020402-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-11 19:44 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-07-11 19:44 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-07-12 0:45 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-12 0:45 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-05 18:06 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta 2012-07-05 18:06 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta [not found] ` <CAM=Q2csv3rEs-xseGd6NHxR3wRSZp82ZqNB1mn-_C4=5=nOc6g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-05 18:47 ` Sascha Hauer 2012-07-05 18:47 ` Sascha Hauer [not found] ` <20120705184736.GW30009-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-08 9:14 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta 2012-07-08 9:14 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20120706005249.GA26888@b20223-02.ap.freescale.net \ --to=richard.zhao-kzfg59tc24xl57midrcfdg@public.gmane.org \ --cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \ --cc=kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linuxzsc-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \ --cc=s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.