* [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
@ 2012-07-01 15:05 Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-01 16:23 ` Randy Dunlap
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2012-07-01 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity, Randy Dunlap, Stephen Rothwell, mtosatti
Cc: x86, kvm, linux-next, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
H. Peter Anvin
On UP i386, when APIC is disabled
# CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set
# CONFIG_PCI_IOAPIC is not set
code looking at apicdrivers never has any effect but it
still gets compiled in. In particular, this causes
build failures with kvm, but it generally bloats the kernel
unnecessarily.
Fix by defining both __apicdrivers and __apicdrivers_end
to be NULL when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is unset: I verified
that as the result any loop scanning __apicdrivers gets optimized out by
the compiler.
Warning: a .config with apic disabled doesn't seem to boot
for me (even without this patch). Still verifying why,
meanwhile this patch is compile-tested only.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
Note: if this patch makes sense, can x86 maintainers
please ACK applying it through the kvm tree, since that is
where we see the issue that it addresses?
Avi, Marcelo, maybe you can carry this in kvm/linux-next as a temporary
measure so that linux-next builds?
arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
index eaff479..aa5b2ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
@@ -417,7 +417,12 @@ extern struct apic *apic;
__aligned(sizeof(struct apic *)) \
__section(.apicdrivers) = { &sym1, &sym2 }
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
extern struct apic *__apicdrivers[], *__apicdrivers_end[];
+#else
+#define __apicdrivers ((struct apic **)NULL)
+#define __apicdrivers_end ((struct apic **)NULL)
+#endif
/*
* APIC functionality to boot other CPUs - only used on SMP:
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
2012-07-01 15:05 [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2012-07-01 16:23 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-07-01 17:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-07-03 18:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2012-07-01 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: Avi Kivity, Stephen Rothwell, mtosatti, x86, kvm, linux-next,
linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin
On 07/01/2012 08:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On UP i386, when APIC is disabled
> # CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set
> # CONFIG_PCI_IOAPIC is not set
>
> code looking at apicdrivers never has any effect but it
> still gets compiled in. In particular, this causes
> build failures with kvm, but it generally bloats the kernel
> unnecessarily.
>
> Fix by defining both __apicdrivers and __apicdrivers_end
> to be NULL when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is unset: I verified
> that as the result any loop scanning __apicdrivers gets optimized out by
> the compiler.
>
> Warning: a .config with apic disabled doesn't seem to boot
> for me (even without this patch). Still verifying why,
> meanwhile this patch is compile-tested only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Thanks.
> ---
>
> Note: if this patch makes sense, can x86 maintainers
> please ACK applying it through the kvm tree, since that is
> where we see the issue that it addresses?
> Avi, Marcelo, maybe you can carry this in kvm/linux-next as a temporary
> measure so that linux-next builds?
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> index eaff479..aa5b2ee 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> @@ -417,7 +417,12 @@ extern struct apic *apic;
> __aligned(sizeof(struct apic *)) \
> __section(.apicdrivers) = { &sym1, &sym2 }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
> extern struct apic *__apicdrivers[], *__apicdrivers_end[];
> +#else
> +#define __apicdrivers ((struct apic **)NULL)
> +#define __apicdrivers_end ((struct apic **)NULL)
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * APIC functionality to boot other CPUs - only used on SMP:
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
2012-07-01 15:05 [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-01 16:23 ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2012-07-01 17:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-07-06 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-07-03 18:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2012-07-01 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: Avi Kivity, Randy Dunlap, Stephen Rothwell, mtosatti, x86, kvm,
linux-next, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar
On 07/01/2012 08:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On UP i386, when APIC is disabled
> # CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set
> # CONFIG_PCI_IOAPIC is not set
>
> code looking at apicdrivers never has any effect but it
> still gets compiled in. In particular, this causes
> build failures with kvm, but it generally bloats the kernel
> unnecessarily.
>
> Fix by defining both __apicdrivers and __apicdrivers_end
> to be NULL when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is unset: I verified
> that as the result any loop scanning __apicdrivers gets optimized out by
> the compiler.
>
> Warning: a .config with apic disabled doesn't seem to boot
> for me (even without this patch). Still verifying why,
> meanwhile this patch is compile-tested only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Note: if this patch makes sense, can x86 maintainers
> please ACK applying it through the kvm tree, since that is
> where we see the issue that it addresses?
> Avi, Marcelo, maybe you can carry this in kvm/linux-next as a temporary
> measure so that linux-next builds?
>
I'm not happy about that as a workflow, but since you guys have an
immediate problem I guess we can do that.
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
2012-07-01 15:05 [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-01 16:23 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-07-01 17:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2012-07-03 18:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2012-07-03 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: Avi Kivity, Randy Dunlap, Stephen Rothwell, x86, kvm, linux-next,
linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 06:05:06PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On UP i386, when APIC is disabled
> # CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set
> # CONFIG_PCI_IOAPIC is not set
>
> code looking at apicdrivers never has any effect but it
> still gets compiled in. In particular, this causes
> build failures with kvm, but it generally bloats the kernel
> unnecessarily.
>
> Fix by defining both __apicdrivers and __apicdrivers_end
> to be NULL when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is unset: I verified
> that as the result any loop scanning __apicdrivers gets optimized out by
> the compiler.
>
> Warning: a .config with apic disabled doesn't seem to boot
> for me (even without this patch). Still verifying why,
> meanwhile this patch is compile-tested only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Note: if this patch makes sense, can x86 maintainers
> please ACK applying it through the kvm tree, since that is
> where we see the issue that it addresses?
> Avi, Marcelo, maybe you can carry this in kvm/linux-next as a temporary
> measure so that linux-next builds?
Applied, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
2012-07-01 17:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2012-07-06 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-07-06 11:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-07-06 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, Avi Kivity, Randy Dunlap, Stephen Rothwell,
mtosatti, x86, kvm, linux-next, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner,
Ingo Molnar
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> On 07/01/2012 08:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On UP i386, when APIC is disabled
> ># CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set
> ># CONFIG_PCI_IOAPIC is not set
> >
> >code looking at apicdrivers never has any effect but it
> >still gets compiled in. In particular, this causes
> >build failures with kvm, but it generally bloats the kernel
> >unnecessarily.
> >
> >Fix by defining both __apicdrivers and __apicdrivers_end
> >to be NULL when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is unset: I verified
> >that as the result any loop scanning __apicdrivers gets optimized out by
> >the compiler.
> >
> >Warning: a .config with apic disabled doesn't seem to boot
> >for me (even without this patch). Still verifying why,
> >meanwhile this patch is compile-tested only.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> >---
> >
> >Note: if this patch makes sense, can x86 maintainers
> >please ACK applying it through the kvm tree, since that is
> >where we see the issue that it addresses?
> >Avi, Marcelo, maybe you can carry this in kvm/linux-next as a temporary
> >measure so that linux-next builds?
> >
>
> I'm not happy about that as a workflow, but since you guys have an
> immediate problem I guess we can do that.
I'm rather unhappy about this workflow - we've got quite a few
apic bits in the x86 tree this cycle as well and need extra
external interaction, not.
Which KVM tree commit caused this, could someone please give a
lkml link or quote it here? It's not referenced in the fix patch
either.
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
2012-07-06 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2012-07-06 11:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-06 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2012-07-06 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: H. Peter Anvin, Michael S. Tsirkin, Avi Kivity, Randy Dunlap,
Stephen Rothwell, x86, kvm, linux-next, linux-kernel,
Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:13:14PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>
> > On 07/01/2012 08:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >On UP i386, when APIC is disabled
> > ># CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set
> > ># CONFIG_PCI_IOAPIC is not set
> > >
> > >code looking at apicdrivers never has any effect but it
> > >still gets compiled in. In particular, this causes
> > >build failures with kvm, but it generally bloats the kernel
> > >unnecessarily.
> > >
> > >Fix by defining both __apicdrivers and __apicdrivers_end
> > >to be NULL when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is unset: I verified
> > >that as the result any loop scanning __apicdrivers gets optimized out by
> > >the compiler.
> > >
> > >Warning: a .config with apic disabled doesn't seem to boot
> > >for me (even without this patch). Still verifying why,
> > >meanwhile this patch is compile-tested only.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > >---
> > >
> > >Note: if this patch makes sense, can x86 maintainers
> > >please ACK applying it through the kvm tree, since that is
> > >where we see the issue that it addresses?
> > >Avi, Marcelo, maybe you can carry this in kvm/linux-next as a temporary
> > >measure so that linux-next builds?
> > >
> >
> > I'm not happy about that as a workflow, but since you guys have an
> > immediate problem I guess we can do that.
>
> I'm rather unhappy about this workflow - we've got quite a few
> apic bits in the x86 tree this cycle as well and need extra
> external interaction, not.
>
> Which KVM tree commit caused this, could someone please give a
> lkml link or quote it here? It's not referenced in the fix patch
> either.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
This tree (kvm.git next):
http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next
Introduced by this commit:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commit;h=ab9cf4996bb989983e73da894b8dd0239aa2c3c2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
2012-07-06 11:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
@ 2012-07-06 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-07-08 20:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-07-06 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcelo Tosatti
Cc: H. Peter Anvin, Michael S. Tsirkin, Avi Kivity, Randy Dunlap,
Stephen Rothwell, x86, kvm, linux-next, linux-kernel,
Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar
* Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:13:14PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 07/01/2012 08:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > >On UP i386, when APIC is disabled
> > > ># CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set
> > > ># CONFIG_PCI_IOAPIC is not set
> > > >
> > > >code looking at apicdrivers never has any effect but it
> > > >still gets compiled in. In particular, this causes
> > > >build failures with kvm, but it generally bloats the kernel
> > > >unnecessarily.
> > > >
> > > >Fix by defining both __apicdrivers and __apicdrivers_end
> > > >to be NULL when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is unset: I verified
> > > >that as the result any loop scanning __apicdrivers gets optimized out by
> > > >the compiler.
> > > >
> > > >Warning: a .config with apic disabled doesn't seem to boot
> > > >for me (even without this patch). Still verifying why,
> > > >meanwhile this patch is compile-tested only.
> > > >
> > > >Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > >---
> > > >
> > > >Note: if this patch makes sense, can x86 maintainers
> > > >please ACK applying it through the kvm tree, since that is
> > > >where we see the issue that it addresses?
> > > >Avi, Marcelo, maybe you can carry this in kvm/linux-next as a temporary
> > > >measure so that linux-next builds?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm not happy about that as a workflow, but since you guys have an
> > > immediate problem I guess we can do that.
> >
> > I'm rather unhappy about this workflow - we've got quite a few
> > apic bits in the x86 tree this cycle as well and need extra
> > external interaction, not.
> >
> > Which KVM tree commit caused this, could someone please give a
> > lkml link or quote it here? It's not referenced in the fix patch
> > either.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ingo
>
> This tree (kvm.git next):
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next
>
> Introduced by this commit:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commit;h=ab9cf4996bb989983e73da894b8dd0239aa2c3c2
This bit:
> + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI)) {
> + struct apic **drv;
> +
> + for (drv = __apicdrivers; drv < __apicdrivers_end; drv++) {
> + /* Should happen once for each apic */
> + WARN_ON((*drv)->eoi_write == kvm_guest_apic_eoi_write);
> + (*drv)->eoi_write = kvm_guest_apic_eoi_write;
> + }
> + }
> +
is rather disgusting I have to say.
WTH is the KVM code meddling with core x86 apic driver data
structures directly? At minimum factor this out and create a
proper apic.c function which is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() exported or
so...
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
2012-07-06 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2012-07-08 20:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-09 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2012-07-08 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti, H. Peter Anvin, Avi Kivity, Randy Dunlap,
Stephen Rothwell, x86, kvm, linux-next, linux-kernel,
Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:12:23PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:13:14PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 07/01/2012 08:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > >On UP i386, when APIC is disabled
> > > > ># CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set
> > > > ># CONFIG_PCI_IOAPIC is not set
> > > > >
> > > > >code looking at apicdrivers never has any effect but it
> > > > >still gets compiled in. In particular, this causes
> > > > >build failures with kvm, but it generally bloats the kernel
> > > > >unnecessarily.
> > > > >
> > > > >Fix by defining both __apicdrivers and __apicdrivers_end
> > > > >to be NULL when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is unset: I verified
> > > > >that as the result any loop scanning __apicdrivers gets optimized out by
> > > > >the compiler.
> > > > >
> > > > >Warning: a .config with apic disabled doesn't seem to boot
> > > > >for me (even without this patch). Still verifying why,
> > > > >meanwhile this patch is compile-tested only.
> > > > >
> > > > >Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > > >---
> > > > >
> > > > >Note: if this patch makes sense, can x86 maintainers
> > > > >please ACK applying it through the kvm tree, since that is
> > > > >where we see the issue that it addresses?
> > > > >Avi, Marcelo, maybe you can carry this in kvm/linux-next as a temporary
> > > > >measure so that linux-next builds?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm not happy about that as a workflow, but since you guys have an
> > > > immediate problem I guess we can do that.
> > >
> > > I'm rather unhappy about this workflow - we've got quite a few
> > > apic bits in the x86 tree this cycle as well and need extra
> > > external interaction, not.
> > >
> > > Which KVM tree commit caused this, could someone please give a
> > > lkml link or quote it here? It's not referenced in the fix patch
> > > either.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Ingo
> >
> > This tree (kvm.git next):
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next
> >
> > Introduced by this commit:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commit;h=ab9cf4996bb989983e73da894b8dd0239aa2c3c2
>
> This bit:
>
> > + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI)) {
> > + struct apic **drv;
> > +
> > + for (drv = __apicdrivers; drv < __apicdrivers_end; drv++) {
> > + /* Should happen once for each apic */
> > + WARN_ON((*drv)->eoi_write == kvm_guest_apic_eoi_write);
> > + (*drv)->eoi_write = kvm_guest_apic_eoi_write;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
>
> is rather disgusting I have to say.
>
> WTH is the KVM code meddling with core x86 apic driver data
> structures directly? At minimum factor this out and create a
> proper apic.c function which is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() exported or
> so...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
OK, so apic_set_eoi_write()?
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
2012-07-08 20:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2012-07-09 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-07-09 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti, H. Peter Anvin, Avi Kivity, Randy Dunlap,
Stephen Rothwell, x86, kvm, linux-next, linux-kernel,
Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar
* Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:12:23PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:13:14PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 07/01/2012 08:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > >On UP i386, when APIC is disabled
> > > > > ># CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set
> > > > > ># CONFIG_PCI_IOAPIC is not set
> > > > > >
> > > > > >code looking at apicdrivers never has any effect but it
> > > > > >still gets compiled in. In particular, this causes
> > > > > >build failures with kvm, but it generally bloats the kernel
> > > > > >unnecessarily.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Fix by defining both __apicdrivers and __apicdrivers_end
> > > > > >to be NULL when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is unset: I verified
> > > > > >that as the result any loop scanning __apicdrivers gets optimized out by
> > > > > >the compiler.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Warning: a .config with apic disabled doesn't seem to boot
> > > > > >for me (even without this patch). Still verifying why,
> > > > > >meanwhile this patch is compile-tested only.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > > > >---
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Note: if this patch makes sense, can x86 maintainers
> > > > > >please ACK applying it through the kvm tree, since that is
> > > > > >where we see the issue that it addresses?
> > > > > >Avi, Marcelo, maybe you can carry this in kvm/linux-next as a temporary
> > > > > >measure so that linux-next builds?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not happy about that as a workflow, but since you guys have an
> > > > > immediate problem I guess we can do that.
> > > >
> > > > I'm rather unhappy about this workflow - we've got quite a few
> > > > apic bits in the x86 tree this cycle as well and need extra
> > > > external interaction, not.
> > > >
> > > > Which KVM tree commit caused this, could someone please give a
> > > > lkml link or quote it here? It's not referenced in the fix patch
> > > > either.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Ingo
> > >
> > > This tree (kvm.git next):
> > >
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next
> > >
> > > Introduced by this commit:
> > >
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commit;h=ab9cf4996bb989983e73da894b8dd0239aa2c3c2
> >
> > This bit:
> >
> > > + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI)) {
> > > + struct apic **drv;
> > > +
> > > + for (drv = __apicdrivers; drv < __apicdrivers_end; drv++) {
> > > + /* Should happen once for each apic */
> > > + WARN_ON((*drv)->eoi_write == kvm_guest_apic_eoi_write);
> > > + (*drv)->eoi_write = kvm_guest_apic_eoi_write;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > is rather disgusting I have to say.
> >
> > WTH is the KVM code meddling with core x86 apic driver data
> > structures directly? At minimum factor this out and create a
> > proper apic.c function which is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() exported or
> > so...
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ingo
>
> OK, so apic_set_eoi_write()?
Yes, with a changelog comment analyzing the design decisions and
locking here - what happens if actual APIC driver use races with
this update on SMP, why is it all safe, etc?
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-09 9:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-01 15:05 [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-01 16:23 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-07-01 17:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-07-06 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-07-06 11:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-06 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-07-08 20:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-09 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-07-03 18:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.