* [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs
@ 2012-07-15 13:42 Marek Vasut
2012-07-16 7:33 ` Heiko Schocher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-07-15 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi guys,
is there any hope the ad-hoc implementation of davinci emac PHYs will ever be
flipped to phylib ?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs
2012-07-15 13:42 [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs Marek Vasut
@ 2012-07-16 7:33 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-07-16 13:56 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Schocher @ 2012-07-16 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hello Marek,
added Tom Rini to cc, as he is the ti maintainer ...
On 15.07.2012 15:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> is there any hope the ad-hoc implementation of davinci emac PHYs will ever be
> flipped to phylib ?
I currently have no such job in sight ...
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs
2012-07-16 7:33 ` Heiko Schocher
@ 2012-07-16 13:56 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-16 18:58 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2012-07-16 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 07/16/2012 12:33 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Marek,
>
> added Tom Rini to cc, as he is the ti maintainer ...
>
> On 15.07.2012 15:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> is there any hope the ad-hoc implementation of davinci emac PHYs will
>> ever be
>> flipped to phylib ?
>
> I currently have no such job in sight ...
The last time someone wanted to add a new phy to the driver I asked them
to investigate and switch over to phylib. That's about as far as it's
gotten.
--
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs
2012-07-16 13:56 ` Tom Rini
@ 2012-07-16 18:58 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-16 19:56 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-07-16 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Tom Rini,
> On 07/16/2012 12:33 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> > Hello Marek,
> >
> > added Tom Rini to cc, as he is the ti maintainer ...
> >
> > On 15.07.2012 15:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> is there any hope the ad-hoc implementation of davinci emac PHYs will
> >> ever be
> >> flipped to phylib ?
> >
> > I currently have no such job in sight ...
>
> The last time someone wanted to add a new phy to the driver I asked them
> to investigate and switch over to phylib. That's about as far as it's
> gotten.
Damn. btw. I'll be moving the OMAP GPIO driver into drivers/gpio/ ... I have a
patch for that already.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs
2012-07-16 18:58 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2012-07-16 19:56 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-16 20:20 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2012-07-16 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 07/16/2012 11:58 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
>
>> On 07/16/2012 12:33 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Hello Marek,
>>>
>>> added Tom Rini to cc, as he is the ti maintainer ...
>>>
>>> On 15.07.2012 15:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> is there any hope the ad-hoc implementation of davinci emac PHYs will
>>>> ever be
>>>> flipped to phylib ?
>>>
>>> I currently have no such job in sight ...
>>
>> The last time someone wanted to add a new phy to the driver I asked them
>> to investigate and switch over to phylib. That's about as far as it's
>> gotten.
>
> Damn. btw. I'll be moving the OMAP GPIO driver into drivers/gpio/ ... I have a
> patch for that already.
It should not be a hard move to make, it's just not anywhere near the
top of my priority list. Since it's on am3517 I can test it without too
much trouble, if someone else does the semi-mechanical stuff :)
--
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs
2012-07-16 19:56 ` Tom Rini
@ 2012-07-16 20:20 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-07-16 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Tom Rini,
> On 07/16/2012 11:58 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Tom Rini,
> >
> >> On 07/16/2012 12:33 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >>> Hello Marek,
> >>>
> >>> added Tom Rini to cc, as he is the ti maintainer ...
> >>>
> >>> On 15.07.2012 15:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>
> >>>> is there any hope the ad-hoc implementation of davinci emac PHYs will
> >>>> ever be
> >>>> flipped to phylib ?
> >>>
> >>> I currently have no such job in sight ...
> >>
> >> The last time someone wanted to add a new phy to the driver I asked them
> >> to investigate and switch over to phylib. That's about as far as it's
> >> gotten.
> >
> > Damn. btw. I'll be moving the OMAP GPIO driver into drivers/gpio/ ... I
> > have a patch for that already.
>
> It should not be a hard move to make, it's just not anywhere near the
> top of my priority list. Since it's on am3517 I can test it without too
> much trouble, if someone else does the semi-mechanical stuff :)
I'll roll out the set after .07 is out. Not before, it's all too heated now too.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-16 20:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-15 13:42 [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs Marek Vasut
2012-07-16 7:33 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-07-16 13:56 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-16 18:58 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-16 19:56 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-16 20:20 ` Marek Vasut
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.