All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] do not send client agent unless server does first
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:09:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120810210953.GA888@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vd32yjzu8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:45:19PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > diff --git a/builtin/fetch-pack.c b/builtin/fetch-pack.c
> > index fe56596..bc7a0f9 100644
> > --- a/builtin/fetch-pack.c
> > +++ b/builtin/fetch-pack.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ static int prefer_ofs_delta = 1;
> >  static int no_done;
> >  static int fetch_fsck_objects = -1;
> >  static int transfer_fsck_objects = -1;
> > +static int agent_supported;
> >  static struct fetch_pack_args args = {
> >  	/* .uploadpack = */ "git-upload-pack",
> >  };
> 
> This is only set to false once per process invocation.  We do not
> currently talk with more than one remote from the same process in
> the "fetch" codepath, and we must maintain that. This fix will be
> broken otherwise ("recursive submodule fetch" comes to mind; one
> more reason it should do its submodule business in a separate
> process).

Right; I followed the existing options in both fetch-pack and send-pack
(use_sideband, no_done, and others here have the same issue), with the
assumption that the current code was not broken (which may not be true,
if it is simply masked by the fact that in practice everybody happens to
support those older features).

I don't know off-hand whether that is actually a trigger-able bug in the
current code or not. It's probably a good topic for a follow-on series.

> > @@ -328,7 +329,8 @@ static int find_common(int fd[2], unsigned char *result_sha1,
> >  			if (args.no_progress)   strbuf_addstr(&c, " no-progress");
> >  			if (args.include_tag)   strbuf_addstr(&c, " include-tag");
> 
> This codepath still forgets to check if the other side advertised
> "thin-pack", "no-progress", and "include-tag", no?

Yes. I didn't realize it until Dave mentioned the "innocuous" list. I
think cleaning them up is reasonable, but probably a separate topic.

> > diff --git a/builtin/send-pack.c b/builtin/send-pack.c
> > index 5c69995..7d05064 100644
> > --- a/builtin/send-pack.c
> > +++ b/builtin/send-pack.c
> > @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
> >  	int status_report = 0;
> >  	int use_sideband = 0;
> >  	int quiet_supported = 0;
> > +	int agent_supported = 0;
> >  	unsigned cmds_sent = 0;
> >  	int ret;
> >  	struct async demux;
> 
> This is initialied to 0 per communication, so having multiple
> remote.$there.pushURL configuration variables will work correctly.

Right. Not through me having thought about it, though, but by following
the existing convention.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-10 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-10  7:53 [PATCH 0/4] jk/version-string and google code Jeff King
2012-08-10  7:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] send-pack: fix capability-sending logic Jeff King
2012-08-10  7:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] do not send client agent unless server does first Jeff King
2012-08-10 19:45   ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-10 21:09     ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-08-10  7:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] connect: learn to parse capabilities with values Jeff King
2012-08-10  8:06   ` Eric Sunshine
2012-08-10 20:01   ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-10 21:15     ` Jeff King
2012-08-10 21:55       ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-13 19:03         ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-13 19:07           ` [PATCH 4/4] fetch-pack: mention server version with verbose output Junio C Hamano
2012-08-13 19:43             ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-13 20:54             ` Jeff King
2012-08-13 21:07               ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-13 21:07                 ` Jeff King
2012-08-13 21:09               ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-13 21:11                 ` Jeff King
2012-08-14  1:59                   ` Jeff King
2012-08-14  2:02                     ` Jeff King
2012-08-14  4:56                       ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-10  7:59 ` Jeff King
2012-08-10 15:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] jk/version-string and google code Junio C Hamano
2012-08-10 17:46   ` Jeff King
2012-08-10 18:52     ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-10 21:50       ` Jeff King
2012-08-10 22:29         ` Shawn Pearce
2012-08-10 22:36           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-10 15:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-10 18:06   ` Dave Borowitz
2012-08-10 18:08     ` Jeff King
2012-08-10 18:13       ` Dave Borowitz
2012-08-10 18:25         ` Jeff King
2012-08-10 21:25           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-10 21:35             ` Jeff King
2012-08-10 21:42               ` Junio C Hamano
2012-08-10 19:11         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120810210953.GA888@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.