All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning
@ 2012-10-04  5:31 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu @ 2012-10-04  5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86, linux-mm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, linux-acpi
  Cc: len.brown, wency, paulus, minchan.kim, kosaki.motohiro, rientjes,
	cl, akpm, liuj97

When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows
many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource.

"Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>"

release_mem_region() has been changed as called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION
chunk since applying a patch(de7f0cba96786c). Because powerpc registers
iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory
on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION
chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource.

The patch fixes the problem.

CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |   13 +++++++++----
 mm/memory_hotplug.c                             |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:22:59.833520792 +0900
+++ linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:23:05.150521411 +0900
@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
 {
 	unsigned long start, start_pfn;
 	struct zone *zone;
-	int ret;
+	int i, ret;
+	int sections_to_remove;
 
 	start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
@@ -97,9 +98,13 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
 	 * to sysfs "state" file and we can't remove sysfs entries
 	 * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
 	 */
-	ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
+		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+		ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Update memory regions for memory remove
Index: linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.6.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-10-04 14:22:59.829520788 +0900
+++ linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-10-04 14:23:25.860527278 +0900
@@ -362,11 +362,11 @@ int __remove_pages(struct zone *zone, un
 	BUG_ON(phys_start_pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK);
 	BUG_ON(nr_pages % PAGES_PER_SECTION);
 
+	release_mem_region(phys_start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
+
 	sections_to_remove = nr_pages / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
 	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
 		unsigned long pfn = phys_start_pfn + i*PAGES_PER_SECTION;
-		release_mem_region(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
-				   PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT);
 		ret = __remove_section(zone, __pfn_to_section(pfn));
 		if (ret)
 			break;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning
@ 2012-10-04  5:31 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu @ 2012-10-04  5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86, linux-mm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, linux-acpi
  Cc: rientjes, liuj97, len.brown, benh, paulus, cl, minchan.kim, akpm,
	kosaki.motohiro, wency

When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows
many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource.

"Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>"

release_mem_region() has been changed as called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION
chunk since applying a patch(de7f0cba96786c). Because powerpc registers
iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory
on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION
chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource.

The patch fixes the problem.

CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |   13 +++++++++----
 mm/memory_hotplug.c                             |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:22:59.833520792 +0900
+++ linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:23:05.150521411 +0900
@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
 {
 	unsigned long start, start_pfn;
 	struct zone *zone;
-	int ret;
+	int i, ret;
+	int sections_to_remove;
 
 	start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
@@ -97,9 +98,13 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
 	 * to sysfs "state" file and we can't remove sysfs entries
 	 * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
 	 */
-	ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
+		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+		ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Update memory regions for memory remove
Index: linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.6.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-10-04 14:22:59.829520788 +0900
+++ linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-10-04 14:23:25.860527278 +0900
@@ -362,11 +362,11 @@ int __remove_pages(struct zone *zone, un
 	BUG_ON(phys_start_pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK);
 	BUG_ON(nr_pages % PAGES_PER_SECTION);
 
+	release_mem_region(phys_start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
+
 	sections_to_remove = nr_pages / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
 	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
 		unsigned long pfn = phys_start_pfn + i*PAGES_PER_SECTION;
-		release_mem_region(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
-				   PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT);
 		ret = __remove_section(zone, __pfn_to_section(pfn));
 		if (ret)
 			break;

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning
@ 2012-10-04  5:31 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu @ 2012-10-04  5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86, linux-mm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, linux-acpi
  Cc: len.brown, wency, paulus, minchan.kim, kosaki.motohiro, rientjes,
	cl, akpm, liuj97

When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows
many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource.

"Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>"

release_mem_region() has been changed as called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION
chunk since applying a patch(de7f0cba96786c). Because powerpc registers
iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory
on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION
chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource.

The patch fixes the problem.

CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |   13 +++++++++----
 mm/memory_hotplug.c                             |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:22:59.833520792 +0900
+++ linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:23:05.150521411 +0900
@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
 {
 	unsigned long start, start_pfn;
 	struct zone *zone;
-	int ret;
+	int i, ret;
+	int sections_to_remove;
 
 	start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
@@ -97,9 +98,13 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
 	 * to sysfs "state" file and we can't remove sysfs entries
 	 * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
 	 */
-	ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
+		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+		ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Update memory regions for memory remove
Index: linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.6.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-10-04 14:22:59.829520788 +0900
+++ linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-10-04 14:23:25.860527278 +0900
@@ -362,11 +362,11 @@ int __remove_pages(struct zone *zone, un
 	BUG_ON(phys_start_pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK);
 	BUG_ON(nr_pages % PAGES_PER_SECTION);
 
+	release_mem_region(phys_start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
+
 	sections_to_remove = nr_pages / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
 	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
 		unsigned long pfn = phys_start_pfn + i*PAGES_PER_SECTION;
-		release_mem_region(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
-				   PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT);
 		ret = __remove_section(zone, __pfn_to_section(pfn));
 		if (ret)
 			break;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning
  2012-10-04  5:31 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
@ 2012-10-05 19:01   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2012-10-05 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
  Cc: x86, linux-mm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, linux-acpi, rientjes,
	liuj97, len.brown, benh, paulus, cl, minchan.kim, akpm, wency,
	Dave Hansen

CC to Dave Hanse.

Hello Dave,

I think following patch works both x86 and ppc. but I'm not ppc
expert. So I'm glad
if you double check it.

thank you.


<intentional full quote>

> When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows
> many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource.
>
> "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>"
>
> release_mem_region() has been changed as called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION
> chunk since applying a patch(de7f0cba96786c). Because powerpc registers
> iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory
> on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION
> chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource.
>
> The patch fixes the problem.
>
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |   13 +++++++++----
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c                             |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c      2012-10-04 14:22:59.833520792 +0900
> +++ linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c   2012-10-04 14:23:05.150521411 +0900
> @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>  {
>         unsigned long start, start_pfn;
>         struct zone *zone;
> -       int ret;
> +       int i, ret;
> +       int sections_to_remove;
>
>         start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> @@ -97,9 +98,13 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>          * to sysfs "state" file and we can't remove sysfs entries
>          * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
>          */
> -       ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -       if (ret)
> -               return ret;
> +       sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> +       for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
> +               unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> +               ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
>
>         /*
>          * Update memory regions for memory remove
> Index: linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.6.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c  2012-10-04 14:22:59.829520788 +0900
> +++ linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c       2012-10-04 14:23:25.860527278 +0900
> @@ -362,11 +362,11 @@ int __remove_pages(struct zone *zone, un
>         BUG_ON(phys_start_pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK);
>         BUG_ON(nr_pages % PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>
> +       release_mem_region(phys_start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
> +
>         sections_to_remove = nr_pages / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
>         for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
>                 unsigned long pfn = phys_start_pfn + i*PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> -               release_mem_region(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> -                                  PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT);
>                 ret = __remove_section(zone, __pfn_to_section(pfn));
>                 if (ret)
>                         break;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning
@ 2012-10-05 19:01   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2012-10-05 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
  Cc: len.brown, wency, linux-acpi, x86, linux-kernel, Dave Hansen,
	linux-mm, paulus, minchan.kim, rientjes, cl, linuxppc-dev, akpm,
	liuj97

CC to Dave Hanse.

Hello Dave,

I think following patch works both x86 and ppc. but I'm not ppc
expert. So I'm glad
if you double check it.

thank you.


<intentional full quote>

> When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows
> many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource.
>
> "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>"
>
> release_mem_region() has been changed as called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION
> chunk since applying a patch(de7f0cba96786c). Because powerpc registers
> iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory
> on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION
> chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource.
>
> The patch fixes the problem.
>
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |   13 +++++++++----
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c                             |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c      2012-10-04 14:22:59.833520792 +0900
> +++ linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c   2012-10-04 14:23:05.150521411 +0900
> @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>  {
>         unsigned long start, start_pfn;
>         struct zone *zone;
> -       int ret;
> +       int i, ret;
> +       int sections_to_remove;
>
>         start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> @@ -97,9 +98,13 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>          * to sysfs "state" file and we can't remove sysfs entries
>          * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
>          */
> -       ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -       if (ret)
> -               return ret;
> +       sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> +       for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
> +               unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> +               ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
>
>         /*
>          * Update memory regions for memory remove
> Index: linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.6.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c  2012-10-04 14:22:59.829520788 +0900
> +++ linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c       2012-10-04 14:23:25.860527278 +0900
> @@ -362,11 +362,11 @@ int __remove_pages(struct zone *zone, un
>         BUG_ON(phys_start_pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK);
>         BUG_ON(nr_pages % PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>
> +       release_mem_region(phys_start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
> +
>         sections_to_remove = nr_pages / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
>         for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
>                 unsigned long pfn = phys_start_pfn + i*PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> -               release_mem_region(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> -                                  PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT);
>                 ret = __remove_section(zone, __pfn_to_section(pfn));
>                 if (ret)
>                         break;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning
  2012-10-04  5:31 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
@ 2012-10-05 21:09   ` Andrew Morton
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2012-10-05 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
  Cc: x86, linux-mm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, linux-acpi, rientjes,
	liuj97, len.brown, benh, paulus, cl, minchan.kim,
	kosaki.motohiro, wency

On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:31:09 +0900
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows
> many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource.
> 
> "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>"
> 
> release_mem_region() has been changed as called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION
> chunk since applying a patch(de7f0cba96786c). Because powerpc registers
> iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory
> on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION
> chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource.
> 
> The patch fixes the problem.
> 
> --- linux-3.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:22:59.833520792 +0900
> +++ linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:23:05.150521411 +0900
> @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>  {
>  	unsigned long start, start_pfn;
>  	struct zone *zone;
> -	int ret;
> +	int i, ret;
> +	int sections_to_remove;
>  
>  	start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
> @@ -97,9 +98,13 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>  	 * to sysfs "state" file and we can't remove sysfs entries
>  	 * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
>  	 */
> -	ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +	sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> +	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
> +		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> +		ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}

It is inappropriate that `i' have a signed 32-bit type.  I doubt if
there's any possibility of an overflow bug here, but using a consistent
and well-chosen type would eliminate all doubt.

Note that __remove_pages() does use an unsigned long for this, although
it stupidly calls that variable "i", despite the C programmers'
expectation that a variable called "i" has type "int".

The same applies to `sections_to_remove', but __remove_pages() went and
decided to use an `int' for that variable.  Sigh.

Anyway, please have a think, and see if we can come up with the best
and most accurate choice of types and identifiers in this code.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning
@ 2012-10-05 21:09   ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2012-10-05 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
  Cc: len.brown, wency, linux-acpi, x86, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	paulus, minchan.kim, kosaki.motohiro, rientjes, cl, linuxppc-dev,
	liuj97

On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:31:09 +0900
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows
> many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource.
> 
> "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>"
> 
> release_mem_region() has been changed as called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION
> chunk since applying a patch(de7f0cba96786c). Because powerpc registers
> iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory
> on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION
> chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource.
> 
> The patch fixes the problem.
> 
> --- linux-3.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:22:59.833520792 +0900
> +++ linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:23:05.150521411 +0900
> @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>  {
>  	unsigned long start, start_pfn;
>  	struct zone *zone;
> -	int ret;
> +	int i, ret;
> +	int sections_to_remove;
>  
>  	start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
> @@ -97,9 +98,13 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>  	 * to sysfs "state" file and we can't remove sysfs entries
>  	 * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
>  	 */
> -	ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +	sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> +	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
> +		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> +		ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}

It is inappropriate that `i' have a signed 32-bit type.  I doubt if
there's any possibility of an overflow bug here, but using a consistent
and well-chosen type would eliminate all doubt.

Note that __remove_pages() does use an unsigned long for this, although
it stupidly calls that variable "i", despite the C programmers'
expectation that a variable called "i" has type "int".

The same applies to `sections_to_remove', but __remove_pages() went and
decided to use an `int' for that variable.  Sigh.

Anyway, please have a think, and see if we can come up with the best
and most accurate choice of types and identifiers in this code.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning
  2012-10-05 21:09   ` Andrew Morton
@ 2012-10-09  2:51     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu @ 2012-10-09  2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: x86, linux-mm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, linux-acpi, rientjes,
	liuj97, len.brown, benh, paulus, cl, minchan.kim,
	kosaki.motohiro, wency, dave

Hi Andrew,

2012/10/06 6:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:31:09 +0900
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows
>> many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource.
>>
>> "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>"
>>
>> release_mem_region() has been changed as called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION
>> chunk since applying a patch(de7f0cba96786c). Because powerpc registers
>> iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory
>> on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION
>> chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource.
>>
>> The patch fixes the problem.
>>
>> --- linux-3.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:22:59.833520792 +0900
>> +++ linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:23:05.150521411 +0900
>> @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>>   {
>>   	unsigned long start, start_pfn;
>>   	struct zone *zone;
>> -	int ret;
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +	int sections_to_remove;
>>
>>   	start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>
>> @@ -97,9 +98,13 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>>   	 * to sysfs "state" file and we can't remove sysfs entries
>>   	 * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
>>   	 */
>> -	ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> +	sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
>> +		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
>> +		ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>
> It is inappropriate that `i' have a signed 32-bit type.  I doubt if
> there's any possibility of an overflow bug here, but using a consistent
> and well-chosen type would eliminate all doubt.
>
> Note that __remove_pages() does use an unsigned long for this, although
> it stupidly calls that variable "i", despite the C programmers'
> expectation that a variable called "i" has type "int".
>
> The same applies to `sections_to_remove', but __remove_pages() went and
> decided to use an `int' for that variable.  Sigh.
>
> Anyway, please have a think, and see if we can come up with the best
> and most accurate choice of types and identifiers in this code.

Your concern is right. Overflow bug may occur in the future.
So I changed type of "i" and "sections_to_remove" to "unsigned long".
Please merge it into your tree instead of previous patch.

__remove_pages() also has same concern. So I'll fix it.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows
many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource.

"Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>"

release_mem_region() has been changed as called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION
chunk since applying a patch(de7f0cba96786c). Because powerpc registers
iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory
on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION
chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource.

The patch fixes the problem.

CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |   11 ++++++++---
  mm/memory_hotplug.c                             |    4 ++--
  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-05 14:33:09.516197839 +0900
+++ linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-09 11:27:50.555709827 +0900
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
  	unsigned long start, start_pfn;
  	struct zone *zone;
  	int ret;
+	unsigned long i, sections_to_remove;
  
  	start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
  
@@ -97,9 +98,13 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
  	 * to sysfs "state" file and we can't remove sysfs entries
  	 * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
  	 */
-	ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
+		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+		ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
  
  	/*
  	 * Update memory regions for memory remove
Index: linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.6.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-10-05 15:21:42.856325965 +0900
+++ linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-10-05 15:21:43.047326148 +0900
@@ -596,11 +596,11 @@ int __remove_pages(struct zone *zone, un
  	BUG_ON(phys_start_pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK);
  	BUG_ON(nr_pages % PAGES_PER_SECTION);
  
+	release_mem_region(phys_start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
+
  	sections_to_remove = nr_pages / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
  	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
  		unsigned long pfn = phys_start_pfn + i*PAGES_PER_SECTION;
-		release_mem_region(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
-				   PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT);
  		ret = __remove_section(zone, __pfn_to_section(pfn));
  		if (ret)
  			break;


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning
@ 2012-10-09  2:51     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu @ 2012-10-09  2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: len.brown, wency, linux-acpi, x86, linux-kernel, dave, linux-mm,
	paulus, minchan.kim, kosaki.motohiro, rientjes, cl, linuxppc-dev,
	liuj97

Hi Andrew,

2012/10/06 6:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:31:09 +0900
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows
>> many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource.
>>
>> "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>"
>>
>> release_mem_region() has been changed as called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION
>> chunk since applying a patch(de7f0cba96786c). Because powerpc registers
>> iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory
>> on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION
>> chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource.
>>
>> The patch fixes the problem.
>>
>> --- linux-3.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:22:59.833520792 +0900
>> +++ linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-04 14:23:05.150521411 +0900
>> @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>>   {
>>   	unsigned long start, start_pfn;
>>   	struct zone *zone;
>> -	int ret;
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +	int sections_to_remove;
>>
>>   	start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>
>> @@ -97,9 +98,13 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
>>   	 * to sysfs "state" file and we can't remove sysfs entries
>>   	 * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
>>   	 */
>> -	ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> +	sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
>> +		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
>> +		ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>
> It is inappropriate that `i' have a signed 32-bit type.  I doubt if
> there's any possibility of an overflow bug here, but using a consistent
> and well-chosen type would eliminate all doubt.
>
> Note that __remove_pages() does use an unsigned long for this, although
> it stupidly calls that variable "i", despite the C programmers'
> expectation that a variable called "i" has type "int".
>
> The same applies to `sections_to_remove', but __remove_pages() went and
> decided to use an `int' for that variable.  Sigh.
>
> Anyway, please have a think, and see if we can come up with the best
> and most accurate choice of types and identifiers in this code.

Your concern is right. Overflow bug may occur in the future.
So I changed type of "i" and "sections_to_remove" to "unsigned long".
Please merge it into your tree instead of previous patch.

__remove_pages() also has same concern. So I'll fix it.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
When our x86 box calls __remove_pages(), release_mem_region() shows
many warnings. And x86 box cannot unregister iomem_resource.

"Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>"

release_mem_region() has been changed as called in each PAGES_PER_SECTION
chunk since applying a patch(de7f0cba96786c). Because powerpc registers
iomem_resource in each PAGES_PER_SECTION chunk. But when I hot add memory
on x86 box, iomem_resource is register in each _CRS not PAGES_PER_SECTION
chunk. So x86 box unregisters iomem_resource.

The patch fixes the problem.

CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |   11 ++++++++---
  mm/memory_hotplug.c                             |    4 ++--
  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-05 14:33:09.516197839 +0900
+++ linux-3.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c	2012-10-09 11:27:50.555709827 +0900
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
  	unsigned long start, start_pfn;
  	struct zone *zone;
  	int ret;
+	unsigned long i, sections_to_remove;
  
  	start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
  
@@ -97,9 +98,13 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
  	 * to sysfs "state" file and we can't remove sysfs entries
  	 * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
  	 */
-	ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
+		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+		ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
  
  	/*
  	 * Update memory regions for memory remove
Index: linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.6.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-10-05 15:21:42.856325965 +0900
+++ linux-3.6/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-10-05 15:21:43.047326148 +0900
@@ -596,11 +596,11 @@ int __remove_pages(struct zone *zone, un
  	BUG_ON(phys_start_pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK);
  	BUG_ON(nr_pages % PAGES_PER_SECTION);
  
+	release_mem_region(phys_start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
+
  	sections_to_remove = nr_pages / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
  	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
  		unsigned long pfn = phys_start_pfn + i*PAGES_PER_SECTION;
-		release_mem_region(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
-				   PAGES_PER_SECTION << PAGE_SHIFT);
  		ret = __remove_section(zone, __pfn_to_section(pfn));
  		if (ret)
  			break;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning
  2012-10-09  2:51     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
@ 2012-10-09 21:39       ` Andrew Morton
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2012-10-09 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
  Cc: x86, linux-mm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, linux-acpi, rientjes,
	liuj97, len.brown, benh, paulus, cl, minchan.kim,
	kosaki.motohiro, wency, dave

On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 11:51:38 +0900
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > Anyway, please have a think, and see if we can come up with the best
> > and most accurate choice of types and identifiers in this code.
> 
> Your concern is right. Overflow bug may occur in the future.
> So I changed type of "i" and "sections_to_remove" to "unsigned long".
> Please merge it into your tree instead of previous patch.

Too late, the original patch was merged.  So I generated the delta.

I remain allergic to the `i' identifier so I renamed it to `section'. 
That's not 100% accurate, but it is better.

> __remove_pages() also has same concern. So I'll fix it.

Thanks.



From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: section removal cleanups

Followups to d760afd4d25 ("memory-hotplug: suppress "Trying to free
nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning").

- use unsigned long type, as overflows are conceivable

- rename `i' to the less-misleading and more informative `section'

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |    9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c~arch-powerpc-platforms-pseries-hotplug-memoryc-section-removal-cleanups arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c~arch-powerpc-platforms-pseries-hotplug-memoryc-section-removal-cleanups
+++ a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
@@ -77,8 +77,9 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
 {
 	unsigned long start, start_pfn;
 	struct zone *zone;
-	int i, ret;
-	int sections_to_remove;
+	int ret;
+	unsigned long section;
+	unsigned long sections_to_remove;
 
 	start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
@@ -99,8 +100,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
 	 * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
 	 */
 	sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
-	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
-		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+	for (section = 0; section < sections_to_remove; section++) {
+		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + section * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
 		ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
diff -puN mm/memory_hotplug.c~arch-powerpc-platforms-pseries-hotplug-memoryc-section-removal-cleanups mm/memory_hotplug.c
_

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning
@ 2012-10-09 21:39       ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2012-10-09 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
  Cc: len.brown, wency, linux-acpi, x86, linux-kernel, dave, linux-mm,
	paulus, minchan.kim, kosaki.motohiro, rientjes, cl, linuxppc-dev,
	liuj97

On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 11:51:38 +0900
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > Anyway, please have a think, and see if we can come up with the best
> > and most accurate choice of types and identifiers in this code.
> 
> Your concern is right. Overflow bug may occur in the future.
> So I changed type of "i" and "sections_to_remove" to "unsigned long".
> Please merge it into your tree instead of previous patch.

Too late, the original patch was merged.  So I generated the delta.

I remain allergic to the `i' identifier so I renamed it to `section'. 
That's not 100% accurate, but it is better.

> __remove_pages() also has same concern. So I'll fix it.

Thanks.



From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: section removal cleanups

Followups to d760afd4d25 ("memory-hotplug: suppress "Trying to free
nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning").

- use unsigned long type, as overflows are conceivable

- rename `i' to the less-misleading and more informative `section'

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |    9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c~arch-powerpc-platforms-pseries-hotplug-memoryc-section-removal-cleanups arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c~arch-powerpc-platforms-pseries-hotplug-memoryc-section-removal-cleanups
+++ a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
@@ -77,8 +77,9 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
 {
 	unsigned long start, start_pfn;
 	struct zone *zone;
-	int i, ret;
-	int sections_to_remove;
+	int ret;
+	unsigned long section;
+	unsigned long sections_to_remove;
 
 	start_pfn = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
@@ -99,8 +100,8 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
 	 * while writing to it. So we have to defer it to here.
 	 */
 	sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
-	for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
-		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+	for (section = 0; section < sections_to_remove; section++) {
+		unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + section * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
 		ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn,  PAGES_PER_SECTION);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
diff -puN mm/memory_hotplug.c~arch-powerpc-platforms-pseries-hotplug-memoryc-section-removal-cleanups mm/memory_hotplug.c
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-09 21:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-04  5:31 memory-hotplug : suppres "Trying to free nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-04  5:31 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-04  5:31 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 19:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 19:01   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 21:09 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 21:09   ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-09  2:51   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-09  2:51     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-09 21:39     ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-09 21:39       ` Andrew Morton

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.