* [PATCH] RCU: update docs to include kfree_rcu()
@ 2012-10-19 16:48 Kees Cook
2012-10-20 21:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2012-10-19 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Dipankar Sarma, Paul E. McKenney, Rob Landley, linux-doc
Mention kfree_rcu() in the call_rcu() section. Additionally fix the
example code for list replacement that used the wrong structure element.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt | 2 +-
Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 13 +++++++++++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
index 4349c14..adb5a37 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ RCU ("read-copy update") its name. The RCU code is as follows:
audit_copy_rule(&ne->rule, &e->rule);
ne->rule.action = newaction;
ne->rule.file_count = newfield_count;
- list_replace_rcu(e, ne);
+ list_replace_rcu(&e->list, &ne->list);
call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
index bf0f6de..160ac55 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
@@ -499,6 +499,8 @@ The foo_reclaim() function might appear as follows:
{
struct foo *fp = container_of(rp, struct foo, rcu);
+ foo_cleanup(fp->a);
+
kfree(fp);
}
@@ -521,6 +523,12 @@ o Use call_rcu() -after- removing a data element from an
read-side critical sections that might be referencing that
data item.
+If the callback for call_rcu() is not doing anything more than calling
+kfree() on the structure, you can use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu()
+to avoid having to write your own callback:
+
+ kfree_rcu(old_fp, rcu);
+
Again, see checklist.txt for additional rules governing the use of RCU.
@@ -773,8 +781,8 @@ a single atomic update, converting to RCU will require special care.
Also, the presence of synchronize_rcu() means that the RCU version of
delete() can now block. If this is a problem, there is a callback-based
-mechanism that never blocks, namely call_rcu(), that can be used in
-place of synchronize_rcu().
+mechanism that never blocks, namely call_rcu() or kfree_rcu(), that can
+be used in place of synchronize_rcu().
7. FULL LIST OF RCU APIs
@@ -813,6 +821,7 @@ RCU: Critical sections Grace period Barrier
rcu_read_unlock synchronize_rcu
rcu_dereference synchronize_rcu_expedited
call_rcu
+ kfree_rcu
bh: Critical sections Grace period Barrier
--
1.7.9.5
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] RCU: update docs to include kfree_rcu()
2012-10-19 16:48 [PATCH] RCU: update docs to include kfree_rcu() Kees Cook
@ 2012-10-20 21:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2012-10-20 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kees Cook; +Cc: linux-kernel, Dipankar Sarma, Rob Landley, linux-doc
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 09:48:30AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Mention kfree_rcu() in the call_rcu() section. Additionally fix the
> example code for list replacement that used the wrong structure element.
Good catch! Queued, and thank you for your review and feedback! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt | 2 +-
> Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 13 +++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
> index 4349c14..adb5a37 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ RCU ("read-copy update") its name. The RCU code is as follows:
> audit_copy_rule(&ne->rule, &e->rule);
> ne->rule.action = newaction;
> ne->rule.file_count = newfield_count;
> - list_replace_rcu(e, ne);
> + list_replace_rcu(&e->list, &ne->list);
> call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
> index bf0f6de..160ac55 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
> @@ -499,6 +499,8 @@ The foo_reclaim() function might appear as follows:
> {
> struct foo *fp = container_of(rp, struct foo, rcu);
>
> + foo_cleanup(fp->a);
> +
> kfree(fp);
> }
>
> @@ -521,6 +523,12 @@ o Use call_rcu() -after- removing a data element from an
> read-side critical sections that might be referencing that
> data item.
>
> +If the callback for call_rcu() is not doing anything more than calling
> +kfree() on the structure, you can use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu()
> +to avoid having to write your own callback:
> +
> + kfree_rcu(old_fp, rcu);
> +
> Again, see checklist.txt for additional rules governing the use of RCU.
>
>
> @@ -773,8 +781,8 @@ a single atomic update, converting to RCU will require special care.
>
> Also, the presence of synchronize_rcu() means that the RCU version of
> delete() can now block. If this is a problem, there is a callback-based
> -mechanism that never blocks, namely call_rcu(), that can be used in
> -place of synchronize_rcu().
> +mechanism that never blocks, namely call_rcu() or kfree_rcu(), that can
> +be used in place of synchronize_rcu().
>
>
> 7. FULL LIST OF RCU APIs
> @@ -813,6 +821,7 @@ RCU: Critical sections Grace period Barrier
> rcu_read_unlock synchronize_rcu
> rcu_dereference synchronize_rcu_expedited
> call_rcu
> + kfree_rcu
>
>
> bh: Critical sections Grace period Barrier
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Chrome OS Security
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-20 21:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-19 16:48 [PATCH] RCU: update docs to include kfree_rcu() Kees Cook
2012-10-20 21:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.