* [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] New: binutils prior to 2.21 have a sysroot bug in ld
@ 2011-01-06 7:07 bugzilla at busybox.net
2011-01-06 8:19 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] " bugzilla at busybox.net
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2011-01-06 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3049
Summary: binutils prior to 2.21 have a sysroot bug in ld
Product: buildroot
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
AssignedTo: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
ReportedBy: rick at sloservers.com
CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Created attachment 2839
--> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=2839
Patch I used to test with binutils-2.20.1
I ran into problems using buildroot to cross-compile mpc (and gcc-4.5.x for
which mpc is a dependency). The build would fail and the cross-compile-ld
would complain that it couldn't find /lib//libc.so.0
It turns out this is a bug in ld from binutils that was fixed in binutils 2.21:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/625320
Basically ld ignores the sysroot path when absolute library paths are given,
which causes errors when cross-compiling.
This issue affects any package that uses absolute library paths, such as mpc
and others.
The fix (which is basically this
http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=195936) ought to be added to the
buildroot patches for binutils versions prior to 2.21.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] binutils prior to 2.21 have a sysroot bug in ld
2011-01-06 7:07 [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] New: binutils prior to 2.21 have a sysroot bug in ld bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2011-01-06 8:19 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2011-01-06 8:56 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2011-01-06 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3049
--- Comment #1 from Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> ---
the patch hasnt been merged upstream, so why do you think 2.21 is fixed ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] binutils prior to 2.21 have a sysroot bug in ld
2011-01-06 7:07 [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] New: binutils prior to 2.21 have a sysroot bug in ld bugzilla at busybox.net
2011-01-06 8:19 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] " bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2011-01-06 8:56 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2011-01-06 18:48 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2011-01-06 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3049
--- Comment #2 from Rick <rick@sloservers.com> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> the patch hasnt been merged upstream, so why do you think 2.21 is fixed ?
I thought I had read that somewhere but I closed my windows and can't find that
reference. If it's not fixed in 2.21 then I misunderstood or misread
something.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] binutils prior to 2.21 have a sysroot bug in ld
2011-01-06 7:07 [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] New: binutils prior to 2.21 have a sysroot bug in ld bugzilla at busybox.net
2011-01-06 8:19 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] " bugzilla at busybox.net
2011-01-06 8:56 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2011-01-06 18:48 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2011-01-07 12:24 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] binutils " bugzilla at busybox.net
2012-10-21 21:07 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2011-01-06 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3049
--- Comment #3 from Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> ---
perhaps you interpreted the "fixed in ubuntu binutils-xxx" as "fixed upstream"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] binutils have a sysroot bug in ld
2011-01-06 7:07 [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] New: binutils prior to 2.21 have a sysroot bug in ld bugzilla at busybox.net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-06 18:48 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2011-01-07 12:24 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2012-10-21 21:07 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2011-01-07 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3049
Rick <rick@sloservers.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|binutils prior to 2.21 have |binutils have a sysroot bug
|a sysroot bug in ld |in ld
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] binutils have a sysroot bug in ld
2011-01-06 7:07 [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] New: binutils prior to 2.21 have a sysroot bug in ld bugzilla at busybox.net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-07 12:24 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] binutils " bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2012-10-21 21:07 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2012-10-21 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3049
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> 2012-10-21 21:07:41 UTC ---
Fixed in git by Gustavoz, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-21 21:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-06 7:07 [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] New: binutils prior to 2.21 have a sysroot bug in ld bugzilla at busybox.net
2011-01-06 8:19 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] " bugzilla at busybox.net
2011-01-06 8:56 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2011-01-06 18:48 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2011-01-07 12:24 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 3049] binutils " bugzilla at busybox.net
2012-10-21 21:07 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.