* [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing
@ 2013-02-23 2:19 Guenter Roeck
2013-02-26 22:07 ` Jean Delvare
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2013-02-23 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Peak attributes were not initialized and cleared correctly.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
Candidate for -stable.
drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
index 9652a2c..eec294a 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
@@ -248,26 +248,26 @@ static int ltc2978_write_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
switch (reg) {
case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_IOUT_HISTORY:
- data->iout_max[page] = 0x7fff;
+ data->iout_max[page] = 0x7c00;
ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
break;
case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_TEMP2_HISTORY:
- data->temp2_max[page] = 0x7fff;
+ data->temp2_max[page] = 0x7c00;
ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
break;
case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_VOUT_HISTORY:
data->vout_min[page] = 0xffff;
- data->vout_max[page] = 0;
+ data->vout_max[page] = 0x0000;
ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
break;
case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_VIN_HISTORY:
data->vin_min = 0x7bff;
- data->vin_max = 0;
+ data->vin_max = 0x7c00;
ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
break;
case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_TEMP_HISTORY:
- data->temp_min = 0x7bff;
- data->temp_max = 0x7fff;
+ data->temp_min = 0xfbff;
+ data->temp_max = 0x7c00;
ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
break;
default:
@@ -321,10 +321,10 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
info = &data->info;
info->write_word_data = ltc2978_write_word_data;
- data->vout_min[0] = 0xffff;
data->vin_min = 0x7bff;
+ data->vin_max = 0x7c00;
data->temp_min = 0x7bff;
- data->temp_max = 0x7fff;
+ data->temp_max = 0x7c00;
switch (id->driver_data) {
case ltc2978:
@@ -336,7 +336,6 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
for (i = 1; i < 8; i++) {
info->func[i] = PMBUS_HAVE_VOUT
| PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_VOUT;
- data->vout_min[i] = 0xffff;
}
break;
case ltc3880:
@@ -352,11 +351,16 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
| PMBUS_HAVE_IOUT | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_IOUT
| PMBUS_HAVE_POUT
| PMBUS_HAVE_TEMP | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_TEMP;
- data->vout_min[1] = 0xffff;
+ data->temp2_max[0] = 0x7c00;
+ data->temp2_max[1] = 0x7c00;
break;
default:
return -ENODEV;
}
+ for (i = 0; i < info->pages; i++) {
+ data->vout_min[i] = 0xffff;
+ data->iout_max[i] = 0x7c00;
+ }
return pmbus_do_probe(client, id, info);
}
--
1.7.9.7
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing
2013-02-23 2:19 [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing Guenter Roeck
@ 2013-02-26 22:07 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-26 22:08 ` Jean Delvare
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2013-02-26 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Guenter,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:19:31 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Peak attributes were not initialized and cleared correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> Candidate for -stable.
Agreed, once it is correct...
>
> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
> index 9652a2c..eec294a 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
> @@ -248,26 +248,26 @@ static int ltc2978_write_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
>
> switch (reg) {
> case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_IOUT_HISTORY:
> - data->iout_max[page] = 0x7fff;
> + data->iout_max[page] = 0x7c00;
> ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
> break;
> case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_TEMP2_HISTORY:
> - data->temp2_max[page] = 0x7fff;
> + data->temp2_max[page] = 0x7c00;
> ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
> break;
> case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_VOUT_HISTORY:
> data->vout_min[page] = 0xffff;
> - data->vout_max[page] = 0;
> + data->vout_max[page] = 0x0000;
If the patch is intended for stable you may want to avoid this kind of
avoidable change.
> ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
> break;
> case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_VIN_HISTORY:
> data->vin_min = 0x7bff;
> - data->vin_max = 0;
> + data->vin_max = 0x7c00;
> ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
> break;
> case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_TEMP_HISTORY:
> - data->temp_min = 0x7bff;
> - data->temp_max = 0x7fff;
> + data->temp_min = 0xfbff;
This looks wrong, 0x7bff was correct as far as I can see? And that's
what you still use during probe, BTW.
> + data->temp_max = 0x7c00;
> ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
> break;
> default:
> @@ -321,10 +321,10 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> info = &data->info;
> info->write_word_data = ltc2978_write_word_data;
>
> - data->vout_min[0] = 0xffff;
> data->vin_min = 0x7bff;
> + data->vin_max = 0x7c00;
> data->temp_min = 0x7bff;
> - data->temp_max = 0x7fff;
> + data->temp_max = 0x7c00;
>
> switch (id->driver_data) {
> case ltc2978:
> @@ -336,7 +336,6 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> for (i = 1; i < 8; i++) {
> info->func[i] = PMBUS_HAVE_VOUT
> | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_VOUT;
> - data->vout_min[i] = 0xffff;
> }
> break;
> case ltc3880:
> @@ -352,11 +351,16 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> | PMBUS_HAVE_IOUT | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_IOUT
> | PMBUS_HAVE_POUT
> | PMBUS_HAVE_TEMP | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_TEMP;
> - data->vout_min[1] = 0xffff;
> + data->temp2_max[0] = 0x7c00;
> + data->temp2_max[1] = 0x7c00;
Unrelated to this patch, but how is data->temp2_max[1] is supposed to
be used when only page 0 has PMBUS_HAVE_TEMP2 defined?
> break;
> default:
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> + for (i = 0; i < info->pages; i++) {
> + data->vout_min[i] = 0xffff;
> + data->iout_max[i] = 0x7c00;
Looks very wrong, data->iout_max[] contains 2 elements and info->pages
could be 8. Only the LTC3880 needs data->iout_max[] anyway, right?
> + }
IMHO it would make more sense to have this grouped with the other
similar initializations. Or left where it was originally...
>
> return pmbus_do_probe(client, id, info);
> }
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing
2013-02-23 2:19 [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing Guenter Roeck
2013-02-26 22:07 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2013-02-26 22:08 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-26 23:14 ` Guenter Roeck
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2013-02-26 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
And one more thing, typo in the subject: inizialization -> initialization
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing
2013-02-23 2:19 [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing Guenter Roeck
2013-02-26 22:07 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-26 22:08 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2013-02-26 23:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-02-26 23:32 ` Guenter Roeck
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2013-02-26 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:07:16PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:19:31 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Peak attributes were not initialized and cleared correctly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > ---
> > Candidate for -stable.
>
> Agreed, once it is correct...
>
Maybe I'll even manage to get it right at some point in the far distant future ...
> >
> > drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
> > index 9652a2c..eec294a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
> > @@ -248,26 +248,26 @@ static int ltc2978_write_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
> >
> > switch (reg) {
> > case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_IOUT_HISTORY:
> > - data->iout_max[page] = 0x7fff;
> > + data->iout_max[page] = 0x7c00;
> > ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
> > break;
> > case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_TEMP2_HISTORY:
> > - data->temp2_max[page] = 0x7fff;
> > + data->temp2_max[page] = 0x7c00;
> > ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
> > break;
> > case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_VOUT_HISTORY:
> > data->vout_min[page] = 0xffff;
> > - data->vout_max[page] = 0;
> > + data->vout_max[page] = 0x0000;
>
> If the patch is intended for stable you may want to avoid this kind of
> avoidable change.
>
> > ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
> > break;
> > case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_VIN_HISTORY:
> > data->vin_min = 0x7bff;
> > - data->vin_max = 0;
> > + data->vin_max = 0x7c00;
> > ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
> > break;
> > case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_TEMP_HISTORY:
> > - data->temp_min = 0x7bff;
> > - data->temp_max = 0x7fff;
> > + data->temp_min = 0xfbff;
>
> This looks wrong, 0x7bff was correct as far as I can see? And that's
> what you still use during probe, BTW.
>
No idea what I am doing. Typo :(.
> > + data->temp_max = 0x7c00;
> > ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
> > break;
> > default:
> > @@ -321,10 +321,10 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > info = &data->info;
> > info->write_word_data = ltc2978_write_word_data;
> >
> > - data->vout_min[0] = 0xffff;
> > data->vin_min = 0x7bff;
> > + data->vin_max = 0x7c00;
> > data->temp_min = 0x7bff;
> > - data->temp_max = 0x7fff;
> > + data->temp_max = 0x7c00;
> >
> > switch (id->driver_data) {
> > case ltc2978:
> > @@ -336,7 +336,6 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > for (i = 1; i < 8; i++) {
> > info->func[i] = PMBUS_HAVE_VOUT
> > | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_VOUT;
> > - data->vout_min[i] = 0xffff;
> > }
> > break;
> > case ltc3880:
> > @@ -352,11 +351,16 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > | PMBUS_HAVE_IOUT | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_IOUT
> > | PMBUS_HAVE_POUT
> > | PMBUS_HAVE_TEMP | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_TEMP;
> > - data->vout_min[1] = 0xffff;
> > + data->temp2_max[0] = 0x7c00;
> > + data->temp2_max[1] = 0x7c00;
>
> Unrelated to this patch, but how is data->temp2_max[1] is supposed to
> be used when only page 0 has PMBUS_HAVE_TEMP2 defined?
>
And why is it an array in the first place ? Yes, I know. That was removed
in one of the subsequent patches, but I might as well do it in this one.
> > break;
> > default:
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> > + for (i = 0; i < info->pages; i++) {
> > + data->vout_min[i] = 0xffff;
> > + data->iout_max[i] = 0x7c00;
>
> Looks very wrong, data->iout_max[] contains 2 elements and info->pages
> could be 8. Only the LTC3880 needs data->iout_max[] anyway, right?
>
> > + }
>
> IMHO it would make more sense to have this grouped with the other
> similar initializations. Or left where it was originally...
>
info->pages is only known here, so I would have to use the maximum number
of pages as loop terminator if I move it up.
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing
2013-02-23 2:19 [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing Guenter Roeck
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-26 23:14 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2013-02-26 23:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-02-27 9:11 ` Jean Delvare
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2013-02-26 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute handling
Peak attributes were not initialized and cleared correctly.
Also, temp2_max is only supported on page 0 and thus does not need to be
an array.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
Candidate for -stable.
v2: Fix still wrong initializations.
temp2_max is only supported/used on page 0 and does not have to be an array.
drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
index 9652a2c..cc29a7e 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct ltc2978_data {
int temp_min, temp_max;
int vout_min[8], vout_max[8];
int iout_max[2];
- int temp2_max[2];
+ int temp2_max;
struct pmbus_driver_info info;
};
@@ -204,10 +204,9 @@ static int ltc3880_read_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page, int reg)
ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, page,
LTC3880_MFR_TEMPERATURE2_PEAK);
if (ret >= 0) {
- if (lin11_to_val(ret)
- > lin11_to_val(data->temp2_max[page]))
- data->temp2_max[page] = ret;
- ret = data->temp2_max[page];
+ if (lin11_to_val(ret) > lin11_to_val(data->temp2_max))
+ data->temp2_max = ret;
+ ret = data->temp2_max;
}
break;
case PMBUS_VIRT_READ_VIN_MIN:
@@ -248,11 +247,11 @@ static int ltc2978_write_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
switch (reg) {
case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_IOUT_HISTORY:
- data->iout_max[page] = 0x7fff;
+ data->iout_max[page] = 0x7c00;
ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
break;
case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_TEMP2_HISTORY:
- data->temp2_max[page] = 0x7fff;
+ data->temp2_max = 0x7c00;
ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
break;
case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_VOUT_HISTORY:
@@ -262,12 +261,12 @@ static int ltc2978_write_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
break;
case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_VIN_HISTORY:
data->vin_min = 0x7bff;
- data->vin_max = 0;
+ data->vin_max = 0x7c00;
ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
break;
case PMBUS_VIRT_RESET_TEMP_HISTORY:
data->temp_min = 0x7bff;
- data->temp_max = 0x7fff;
+ data->temp_max = 0x7c00;
ret = ltc2978_clear_peaks(client, page, data->id);
break;
default:
@@ -321,10 +320,11 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
info = &data->info;
info->write_word_data = ltc2978_write_word_data;
- data->vout_min[0] = 0xffff;
data->vin_min = 0x7bff;
+ data->vin_max = 0x7c00;
data->temp_min = 0x7bff;
- data->temp_max = 0x7fff;
+ data->temp_max = 0x7c00;
+ data->temp2_max = 0x7c00;
switch (id->driver_data) {
case ltc2978:
@@ -336,7 +336,6 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
for (i = 1; i < 8; i++) {
info->func[i] = PMBUS_HAVE_VOUT
| PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_VOUT;
- data->vout_min[i] = 0xffff;
}
break;
case ltc3880:
@@ -352,11 +351,14 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
| PMBUS_HAVE_IOUT | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_IOUT
| PMBUS_HAVE_POUT
| PMBUS_HAVE_TEMP | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_TEMP;
- data->vout_min[1] = 0xffff;
+ data->iout_max[0] = 0x7c00;
+ data->iout_max[1] = 0x7c00;
break;
default:
return -ENODEV;
}
+ for (i = 0; i < info->pages; i++)
+ data->vout_min[i] = 0xffff;
return pmbus_do_probe(client, id, info);
}
--
1.7.9.7
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing
2013-02-23 2:19 [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing Guenter Roeck
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-26 23:32 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2013-02-27 9:11 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-27 9:23 ` Jean Delvare
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2013-02-27 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:14:04 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:07:16PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > IMHO it would make more sense to have this grouped with the other
> > similar initializations. Or left where it was originally...
> >
> info->pages is only known here, so I would have to use the maximum number
> of pages as loop terminator if I move it up.
Oops, you're right, sorry for missing this. I should have guessed there
was a reason.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing
2013-02-23 2:19 [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing Guenter Roeck
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-27 9:11 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2013-02-27 9:23 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-27 9:26 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-27 16:39 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2013-02-27 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:32:33 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute handling
>
> Peak attributes were not initialized and cleared correctly.
> Also, temp2_max is only supported on page 0 and thus does not need to be
> an array.
Doing both in the same patch will make it harder to get it in stable.
The second change is clearly a clean up not a bug fix.
But other than this it looks good:
Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> Candidate for -stable.
>
> v2: Fix still wrong initializations.
> temp2_max is only supported/used on page 0 and does not have to be an array.
>
> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ltc2978.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing
2013-02-23 2:19 [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing Guenter Roeck
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-27 9:23 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2013-02-27 9:26 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-27 16:39 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2013-02-27 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:23:41 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> But other than this it looks good:
... except for the remaining typo in the subject line, of course ;)
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing
2013-02-23 2:19 [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing Guenter Roeck
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-27 9:26 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2013-02-27 16:39 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2013-02-27 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:26:42AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:23:41 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > But other than this it looks good:
>
> ... except for the remaining typo in the subject line, of course ;)
>
Oh, I 'solved' that one by replacing the subject with "Fix peak attribute
handling". Only my attempt to send v2 as response to v1 went wrong,
and the new headline ended up embedded in the e-mail instead of showing up
as new subject.
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-27 16:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-23 2:19 [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Fix peak attribute inizialization and clearing Guenter Roeck
2013-02-26 22:07 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-26 22:08 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-26 23:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-02-26 23:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-02-27 9:11 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-27 9:23 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-27 9:26 ` Jean Delvare
2013-02-27 16:39 ` Guenter Roeck
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.