All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] Conflict between mainline and ARM trees on davinci
@ 2013-03-11  9:38 Albert ARIBAUD
  2013-03-11 20:03 ` Tom Rini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2013-03-11  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hello,

There is merge conflict between mainline and ARM trees on davinci gpio,
between

	commit 03414ac45e119496e2475aeacbb968bb67da24f8
	gpio: Build the da8xx_gpio code for the davinci644x device
	(mainline)

and

	commit b9f56698c7e9bf7ac773b5346c4f6886e214b69b
	da8xx: Add the missing pinmux for da830 to the gpio driver
	(ARM, from TI tree)

Authors CC:ed, as well as Tom for both TI and mainline tree.

Tom, how do you want to reconcile things?

Manual resolution in the merge commit was frowned upon last time I did
it, because it introduces non-reviewed code changes.

This leaves doing a manual commit on either one of the mainline, ARM or
TI trees so that merge becomes trivial. Mainline tree is preferable I
think, because it avoids added PR.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] Conflict between mainline and ARM trees on davinci
  2013-03-11  9:38 [U-Boot] Conflict between mainline and ARM trees on davinci Albert ARIBAUD
@ 2013-03-11 20:03 ` Tom Rini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2013-03-11 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:38:21AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> There is merge conflict between mainline and ARM trees on davinci gpio,
> between
> 
> 	commit 03414ac45e119496e2475aeacbb968bb67da24f8
> 	gpio: Build the da8xx_gpio code for the davinci644x device
> 	(mainline)
> 
> and
> 
> 	commit b9f56698c7e9bf7ac773b5346c4f6886e214b69b
> 	da8xx: Add the missing pinmux for da830 to the gpio driver
> 	(ARM, from TI tree)
> 
> Authors CC:ed, as well as Tom for both TI and mainline tree.
> 
> Tom, how do you want to reconcile things?
> 
> Manual resolution in the merge commit was frowned upon last time I did
> it, because it introduces non-reviewed code changes.
> 
> This leaves doing a manual commit on either one of the mainline, ARM or
> TI trees so that merge becomes trivial. Mainline tree is preferable I
> think, because it avoids added PR.

This is addressed with the next u-boot-ti/master pull request where I
included the conflict resolution commit.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20130311/be1f6097/attachment-0001.pgp>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-11 20:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-11  9:38 [U-Boot] Conflict between mainline and ARM trees on davinci Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-11 20:03 ` Tom Rini

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.