All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v8 01/11] CPU hotplug: Provide a generic helper to disable/enable CPU hotplug
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 04:49:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130511094903.GC3658@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518E0BB0.2000401@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thank you.  That fixed the alpha allmodconfig case for me.  I am currently
rebuilding all the arm defconfig files and will resubmit -v10 when that
is done.

Robin

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 02:43:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 09:46 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:03:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Fri, 10 May 2013 13:11:51 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>>> cpu_hotplug_disable() doesn't get compiled unless we've defined
> >>>> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP.  I cannot begin to imagine what the logic is
> >>>> behind that!
> >>>
> >>> I suppose it was only used by suspend/hibernate code paths when this was
> >>> introduced.
> >>
> >> OK, well I suspect that what I have now is simply wrong for Robin's
> >> application.  Robin, can you please check this?  We probably want to
> >> make the does-something version of cpu_hotplug_disable/enable available
> >> if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU.
> > 
> > This patch came from "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
> > I think I need to defer.
> 
> Here is a revised patch, which should address all the problems, IMHO.
> Let me know if you face any issues. (And thanks a lot for fixing up the
> !SMP case in the previous version.)
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------->
> 
> From: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] CPU hotplug: Provide a generic helper to disable/enable CPU hotplug
> 
> There are instances in the kernel where we would like to disable
> CPU hotplug (from sysfs) during some important operation. Today
> the freezer code depends on this and the code to do it was kinda
> tailor-made for that.
> 
> Restructure the code and make it generic enough to be useful for
> other usecases too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  include/linux/cpu.h |    4 ++++
>  kernel/cpu.c        |   55 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
> index c6f6e08..9f3c7e8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
> @@ -175,6 +175,8 @@ extern struct bus_type cpu_subsys;
>  
>  extern void get_online_cpus(void);
>  extern void put_online_cpus(void);
> +extern void cpu_hotplug_disable(void);
> +extern void cpu_hotplug_enable(void);
>  #define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri)	cpu_notifier(fn, pri)
>  #define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb)	register_cpu_notifier(nb)
>  #define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb)	unregister_cpu_notifier(nb)
> @@ -198,6 +200,8 @@ static inline void cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock(void)
>  
>  #define get_online_cpus()	do { } while (0)
>  #define put_online_cpus()	do { } while (0)
> +#define cpu_hotplug_disable()	do { } while (0)
> +#define cpu_hotplug_enable()	do { } while (0)
>  #define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri)	do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
>  /* These aren't inline functions due to a GCC bug. */
>  #define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb)	({ (void)(nb); 0; })
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index b5e4ab2..198a388 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,27 @@ static void cpu_hotplug_done(void)
>  	mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Wait for currently running CPU hotplug operations to complete (if any) and
> + * disable future CPU hotplug (from sysfs). The 'cpu_add_remove_lock' protects
> + * the 'cpu_hotplug_disabled' flag. The same lock is also acquired by the
> + * hotplug path before performing hotplug operations. So acquiring that lock
> + * guarantees mutual exclusion from any currently running hotplug operations.
> + */
> +void cpu_hotplug_disable(void)
> +{
> +	cpu_maps_update_begin();
> +	cpu_hotplug_disabled = 1;
> +	cpu_maps_update_done();
> +}
> +
> +void cpu_hotplug_enable(void)
> +{
> +	cpu_maps_update_begin();
> +	cpu_hotplug_disabled = 0;
> +	cpu_maps_update_done();
> +}
> +
>  #else /* #if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
>  static void cpu_hotplug_begin(void) {}
>  static void cpu_hotplug_done(void) {}
> @@ -541,36 +562,6 @@ static int __init alloc_frozen_cpus(void)
>  core_initcall(alloc_frozen_cpus);
>  
>  /*
> - * Prevent regular CPU hotplug from racing with the freezer, by disabling CPU
> - * hotplug when tasks are about to be frozen. Also, don't allow the freezer
> - * to continue until any currently running CPU hotplug operation gets
> - * completed.
> - * To modify the 'cpu_hotplug_disabled' flag, we need to acquire the
> - * 'cpu_add_remove_lock'. And this same lock is also taken by the regular
> - * CPU hotplug path and released only after it is complete. Thus, we
> - * (and hence the freezer) will block here until any currently running CPU
> - * hotplug operation gets completed.
> - */
> -void cpu_hotplug_disable_before_freeze(void)
> -{
> -	cpu_maps_update_begin();
> -	cpu_hotplug_disabled = 1;
> -	cpu_maps_update_done();
> -}
> -
> -
> -/*
> - * When tasks have been thawed, re-enable regular CPU hotplug (which had been
> - * disabled while beginning to freeze tasks).
> - */
> -void cpu_hotplug_enable_after_thaw(void)
> -{
> -	cpu_maps_update_begin();
> -	cpu_hotplug_disabled = 0;
> -	cpu_maps_update_done();
> -}
> -
> -/*
>   * When callbacks for CPU hotplug notifications are being executed, we must
>   * ensure that the state of the system with respect to the tasks being frozen
>   * or not, as reported by the notification, remains unchanged *throughout the
> @@ -589,12 +580,12 @@ cpu_hotplug_pm_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  
>  	case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
>  	case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> -		cpu_hotplug_disable_before_freeze();
> +		cpu_hotplug_disable();
>  		break;
>  
>  	case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
>  	case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
> -		cpu_hotplug_enable_after_thaw();
> +		cpu_hotplug_enable();
>  		break;
>  
>  	default:
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: holt@sgi.com (Robin Holt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH -v8 01/11] CPU hotplug: Provide a generic helper to disable/enable CPU hotplug
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 04:49:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130511094903.GC3658@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518E0BB0.2000401@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thank you.  That fixed the alpha allmodconfig case for me.  I am currently
rebuilding all the arm defconfig files and will resubmit -v10 when that
is done.

Robin

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 02:43:20PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 09:46 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:03:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Fri, 10 May 2013 13:11:51 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>>> cpu_hotplug_disable() doesn't get compiled unless we've defined
> >>>> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP.  I cannot begin to imagine what the logic is
> >>>> behind that!
> >>>
> >>> I suppose it was only used by suspend/hibernate code paths when this was
> >>> introduced.
> >>
> >> OK, well I suspect that what I have now is simply wrong for Robin's
> >> application.  Robin, can you please check this?  We probably want to
> >> make the does-something version of cpu_hotplug_disable/enable available
> >> if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU.
> > 
> > This patch came from "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
> > I think I need to defer.
> 
> Here is a revised patch, which should address all the problems, IMHO.
> Let me know if you face any issues. (And thanks a lot for fixing up the
> !SMP case in the previous version.)
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------->
> 
> From: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] CPU hotplug: Provide a generic helper to disable/enable CPU hotplug
> 
> There are instances in the kernel where we would like to disable
> CPU hotplug (from sysfs) during some important operation. Today
> the freezer code depends on this and the code to do it was kinda
> tailor-made for that.
> 
> Restructure the code and make it generic enough to be useful for
> other usecases too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  include/linux/cpu.h |    4 ++++
>  kernel/cpu.c        |   55 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
> index c6f6e08..9f3c7e8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
> @@ -175,6 +175,8 @@ extern struct bus_type cpu_subsys;
>  
>  extern void get_online_cpus(void);
>  extern void put_online_cpus(void);
> +extern void cpu_hotplug_disable(void);
> +extern void cpu_hotplug_enable(void);
>  #define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri)	cpu_notifier(fn, pri)
>  #define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb)	register_cpu_notifier(nb)
>  #define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb)	unregister_cpu_notifier(nb)
> @@ -198,6 +200,8 @@ static inline void cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock(void)
>  
>  #define get_online_cpus()	do { } while (0)
>  #define put_online_cpus()	do { } while (0)
> +#define cpu_hotplug_disable()	do { } while (0)
> +#define cpu_hotplug_enable()	do { } while (0)
>  #define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri)	do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
>  /* These aren't inline functions due to a GCC bug. */
>  #define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb)	({ (void)(nb); 0; })
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index b5e4ab2..198a388 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,27 @@ static void cpu_hotplug_done(void)
>  	mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Wait for currently running CPU hotplug operations to complete (if any) and
> + * disable future CPU hotplug (from sysfs). The 'cpu_add_remove_lock' protects
> + * the 'cpu_hotplug_disabled' flag. The same lock is also acquired by the
> + * hotplug path before performing hotplug operations. So acquiring that lock
> + * guarantees mutual exclusion from any currently running hotplug operations.
> + */
> +void cpu_hotplug_disable(void)
> +{
> +	cpu_maps_update_begin();
> +	cpu_hotplug_disabled = 1;
> +	cpu_maps_update_done();
> +}
> +
> +void cpu_hotplug_enable(void)
> +{
> +	cpu_maps_update_begin();
> +	cpu_hotplug_disabled = 0;
> +	cpu_maps_update_done();
> +}
> +
>  #else /* #if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
>  static void cpu_hotplug_begin(void) {}
>  static void cpu_hotplug_done(void) {}
> @@ -541,36 +562,6 @@ static int __init alloc_frozen_cpus(void)
>  core_initcall(alloc_frozen_cpus);
>  
>  /*
> - * Prevent regular CPU hotplug from racing with the freezer, by disabling CPU
> - * hotplug when tasks are about to be frozen. Also, don't allow the freezer
> - * to continue until any currently running CPU hotplug operation gets
> - * completed.
> - * To modify the 'cpu_hotplug_disabled' flag, we need to acquire the
> - * 'cpu_add_remove_lock'. And this same lock is also taken by the regular
> - * CPU hotplug path and released only after it is complete. Thus, we
> - * (and hence the freezer) will block here until any currently running CPU
> - * hotplug operation gets completed.
> - */
> -void cpu_hotplug_disable_before_freeze(void)
> -{
> -	cpu_maps_update_begin();
> -	cpu_hotplug_disabled = 1;
> -	cpu_maps_update_done();
> -}
> -
> -
> -/*
> - * When tasks have been thawed, re-enable regular CPU hotplug (which had been
> - * disabled while beginning to freeze tasks).
> - */
> -void cpu_hotplug_enable_after_thaw(void)
> -{
> -	cpu_maps_update_begin();
> -	cpu_hotplug_disabled = 0;
> -	cpu_maps_update_done();
> -}
> -
> -/*
>   * When callbacks for CPU hotplug notifications are being executed, we must
>   * ensure that the state of the system with respect to the tasks being frozen
>   * or not, as reported by the notification, remains unchanged *throughout the
> @@ -589,12 +580,12 @@ cpu_hotplug_pm_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  
>  	case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
>  	case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> -		cpu_hotplug_disable_before_freeze();
> +		cpu_hotplug_disable();
>  		break;
>  
>  	case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
>  	case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
> -		cpu_hotplug_enable_after_thaw();
> +		cpu_hotplug_enable();
>  		break;
>  
>  	default:
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-11  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-07 14:39 [PATCH -v8 00/11] Shutdown from reboot_cpuid without stopping other cpus Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` [PATCH -v8 01/11] CPU hotplug: Provide a generic helper to disable/enable CPU hotplug Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39   ` Robin Holt
2013-05-09 22:01   ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-09 22:01     ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-10 11:11     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-10 11:11       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-10 17:03       ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-10 17:03         ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-11  4:16         ` Robin Holt
2013-05-11  4:16           ` Robin Holt
2013-05-11  9:13           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-05-11  9:13             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-05-11  9:49             ` Robin Holt [this message]
2013-05-11  9:49               ` Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` [PATCH -v8 02/11] Migrate shutdown/reboot to boot cpu Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39   ` Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` [PATCH -v8 03/11] Remove -stable friendly PF_THREAD_BOUND define Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39   ` Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` [PATCH -v8 04/11] Move shutdown/reboot related functions to kernel/reboot.c Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39   ` Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` [PATCH -v8 05/11] checkpatch.pl the new kernel/reboot.c file Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39   ` Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` [PATCH -v8 06/11] x86, prepare reboot_mode for moving to generic kernel code Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39   ` Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` [PATCH -v8 07/11] unicore32, " Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39   ` Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` [PATCH -v8 08/11] arm, Remove unused restart_mode fields from some arm subarchs Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39   ` Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` [PATCH -v8 09/11] arm, prepare reboot_mode for moving to generic kernel code Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39   ` Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` [PATCH -v8 10/11] arm, change reboot_mode to use enum reboot_mode Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39   ` Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39 ` [PATCH -v8 11/11] Move arch/x86 reboot= handling to generic kernel Robin Holt
2013-05-07 14:39   ` Robin Holt
2013-05-08 10:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-08 10:39     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-08 18:20     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-08 18:20       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-08 18:33       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-08 18:33         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-09 11:20         ` Robin Holt
2013-05-09 11:20           ` Robin Holt
2013-05-09 13:01           ` Robin Holt
2013-05-09 13:01             ` Robin Holt
2013-05-09 13:36             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-09 13:36               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-09 15:59               ` Robin Holt
2013-05-09 15:59                 ` Robin Holt
2013-05-08 18:23   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-08 18:23     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-09 11:29     ` Robin Holt
2013-05-09 11:29       ` Robin Holt
2013-05-08 20:50   ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-08 20:50     ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-09 11:29     ` Robin Holt
2013-05-09 11:29       ` Robin Holt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130511094903.GC3658@sgi.com \
    --to=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rja@sgi.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.