All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:25:37 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130521142537.00a9ccb7ca4aa81f553b61cf@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1391 bytes --]

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c between commit aafc787e41fd ("arm: bpf_jit: can
call module_free() from any context") from the net-next tree and commit
"ARM: net: bpf_jit: make code generation less dependent on struct
sk_filter" from the akpm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index f50d223,2dab3e6..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@@ -926,8 -926,32 +925,21 @@@ out
  	return;
  }
  
+ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
+ {
+ 	struct jit_ctx ctx;
+ 
+ 	memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx));
+ 	ctx.prog_len = fp->len;
+ 	ctx.prog_insns = fp->insns;
+ 
+ 	__bpf_jit_compile(&ctx);
+ 	if (ctx.target)
+ 		fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target;
+ }
+ 
 -static void bpf_jit_free_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 -{
 -	module_free(NULL, work);
 -}
 -
  void bpf_jit_free(struct sk_filter *fp)
  {
 -	struct work_struct *work;
 -
 -	if (fp->bpf_func != sk_run_filter) {
 -		work = (struct work_struct *)fp->bpf_func;
 -
 -		INIT_WORK(work, bpf_jit_free_worker);
 -		schedule_work(work);
 -	}
 +	if (fp->bpf_func != sk_run_filter)
 +		module_free(NULL, fp->bpf_func);
  }

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:25:37 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130521142537.00a9ccb7ca4aa81f553b61cf@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1391 bytes --]

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c between commit aafc787e41fd ("arm: bpf_jit: can
call module_free() from any context") from the net-next tree and commit
"ARM: net: bpf_jit: make code generation less dependent on struct
sk_filter" from the akpm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index f50d223,2dab3e6..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@@ -926,8 -926,32 +925,21 @@@ out
  	return;
  }
  
+ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
+ {
+ 	struct jit_ctx ctx;
+ 
+ 	memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx));
+ 	ctx.prog_len = fp->len;
+ 	ctx.prog_insns = fp->insns;
+ 
+ 	__bpf_jit_compile(&ctx);
+ 	if (ctx.target)
+ 		fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target;
+ }
+ 
 -static void bpf_jit_free_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 -{
 -	module_free(NULL, work);
 -}
 -
  void bpf_jit_free(struct sk_filter *fp)
  {
 -	struct work_struct *work;
 -
 -	if (fp->bpf_func != sk_run_filter) {
 -		work = (struct work_struct *)fp->bpf_func;
 -
 -		INIT_WORK(work, bpf_jit_free_worker);
 -		schedule_work(work);
 -	}
 +	if (fp->bpf_func != sk_run_filter)
 +		module_free(NULL, fp->bpf_func);
  }

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2013-05-21  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-21  4:25 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2013-05-21  4:25 ` linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21  7:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-05-21 23:54   ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-22  9:20     ` Daniel Borkmann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-02  9:30 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-02  9:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-03 10:49 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-16  4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-20  5:10 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-07  5:23 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-07  8:40 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2017-02-07  9:45   ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-14  7:39 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-14  7:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-14  7:38 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-14  7:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23  8:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23  8:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06  9:00 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06  9:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06  8:55 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06  8:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21  4:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21  4:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21  4:29 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21  4:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-21 20:04   ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-22  7:07   ` David Miller
2013-05-22  7:14     ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-22  7:19       ` David Miller
2013-05-22  7:48         ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-05-20  4:14 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-20  4:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-20  4:11 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-20  4:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-20  6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-20  6:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-20  6:43 ` Cong Wang
2013-02-15  6:56 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-15  6:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-08  3:56 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-08  3:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-23  3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-23  3:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-23  3:40 ` Neil Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130521142537.00a9ccb7ca4aa81f553b61cf@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nschichan@freebox.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.