From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> To: Zhu Richard-R65037 <r65037@freescale.com> Cc: Richard Zhu <richard.zhuhongxing@gmail.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "jgarzik@pobox.com" <jgarzik@pobox.com>, "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org> Subject: Re: [v1 2/3] ata: ahci_platform: enable imx6q ahci sata support Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:32:38 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20130618023236.GA28384@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <0E83723C55F66F43A6041464FE31119D303700@039-SN2MPN1-013.039d.mgd.msft.net> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 02:19:52AM +0000, Zhu Richard-R65037 wrote: > Hi Tejun&Shawn: > Thanks for your comments. > > Hi Tejun: > I looked through the for-next branch of the libata git-repo, there maybe a merge conflict. > " > static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "snps,spear-ahci", }, > { .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", }, This is exactly what I'm concerned about. We will end up with a huge match table with all different platform specific compatible strings in there. But they're all matching to the same programming model of the same IP block. That's not how device tree compatible table works. > {}, > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ahci_of_match); > " > > How about to re-change the patch, based on for-next branch of the libata git-repo. > Yes, I think the driver part and platform part can go separately. Shawn
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: shawn.guo@linaro.org (Shawn Guo) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [v1 2/3] ata: ahci_platform: enable imx6q ahci sata support Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:32:38 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20130618023236.GA28384@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <0E83723C55F66F43A6041464FE31119D303700@039-SN2MPN1-013.039d.mgd.msft.net> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 02:19:52AM +0000, Zhu Richard-R65037 wrote: > Hi Tejun&Shawn: > Thanks for your comments. > > Hi Tejun: > I looked through the for-next branch of the libata git-repo, there maybe a merge conflict. > " > static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "snps,spear-ahci", }, > { .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", }, This is exactly what I'm concerned about. We will end up with a huge match table with all different platform specific compatible strings in there. But they're all matching to the same programming model of the same IP block. That's not how device tree compatible table works. > {}, > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ahci_of_match); > " > > How about to re-change the patch, based on for-next branch of the libata git-repo. > Yes, I think the driver part and platform part can go separately. Shawn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 2:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-06-17 9:52 [PATCH V1 0/3] ahci: enable ahci sata support on imx6q Richard Zhu 2013-06-17 9:52 ` Richard Zhu 2013-06-17 9:52 ` [v1 1/3] ARM: dtsi: enable ahci sata on imx6q platforms Richard Zhu 2013-06-18 2:06 ` Shawn Guo 2013-06-18 2:06 ` Shawn Guo 2013-06-18 2:20 ` Zhu Richard-R65037 2013-06-18 2:20 ` Zhu Richard-R65037 2013-06-17 9:52 ` [v1 2/3] ata: ahci_platform: enable imx6q ahci sata support Richard Zhu 2013-06-17 18:27 ` Tejun Heo 2013-06-17 18:27 ` Tejun Heo 2013-06-18 2:01 ` Shawn Guo 2013-06-18 2:01 ` Shawn Guo 2013-06-18 2:19 ` Zhu Richard-R65037 2013-06-18 2:19 ` Zhu Richard-R65037 2013-06-18 2:32 ` Shawn Guo [this message] 2013-06-18 2:32 ` Shawn Guo 2013-06-17 9:52 ` [v1 3/3] imx: ahci: enable ahci sata on imx6q platforms Richard Zhu 2013-06-18 3:03 ` Shawn Guo 2013-06-18 3:03 ` Shawn Guo 2013-06-18 5:00 ` Zhu Richard-R65037 2013-06-18 5:00 ` Zhu Richard-R65037 2013-06-18 5:59 ` Shawn Guo 2013-06-18 5:59 ` Shawn Guo 2013-06-18 19:56 ` Sascha Hauer 2013-06-18 19:56 ` Sascha Hauer 2013-06-19 2:38 ` Zhu Richard-R65037 2013-06-19 2:38 ` Zhu Richard-R65037
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20130618023236.GA28384@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net \ --to=shawn.guo@linaro.org \ --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=r65037@freescale.com \ --cc=richard.zhuhongxing@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.