* [PATCH] xfstests: unmount scratch mnt in test 307
@ 2013-05-03 20:11 ` Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2013-05-03 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs, linux-btrfs
So if you have a mount command that doesn't use /etc/mtab then it will spit out
a different device for the mounted device. So say we have
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
we will turn this into
SCRATCH_DEV="/dev/sda"
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
and then when you mkfs this you do _scratch_mkfs $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL which turns
into this
mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sda
becuase we do
mkfs $* $SCRATCH_DEV
Then btrfs will always show the lowest devid in /proc/mounts to maintain
consistency, so even though we do mount /dev/sda $SCRATCH_MNT, you will see
/dev/sdb as the mounted device in /proc/mounts. So then say the next test wants
to just use $SCRATCH_DEV, it will do _require_scratchdev which will check to see
if $SCRATCH_DEV is mounted, which it will look like it is not because
/proc/mounts shows /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sda, and so it won't umount
$SCRATCH_MNT, and then that test will fail because we can't mkfs the device
because it is busy. I reproduced this on a box that doesn't use /etc/mtab by
doing
./check btrfs/307 generic/015
and 015 would fail. With this patch it passes now. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
---
tests/btrfs/307 | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/307 b/tests/btrfs/307
index 87314c6..15157b3 100644
--- a/tests/btrfs/307
+++ b/tests/btrfs/307
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ _cleanup()
{
cd /
rm -f $tmp.*
+ umount $SCRATCH_MNT
}
# get standard environment, filters and checks
--
1.7.7.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] xfstests: unmount scratch mnt in test 307
@ 2013-05-03 20:11 ` Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2013-05-03 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs, linux-btrfs
So if you have a mount command that doesn't use /etc/mtab then it will spit out
a different device for the mounted device. So say we have
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
we will turn this into
SCRATCH_DEV="/dev/sda"
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
and then when you mkfs this you do _scratch_mkfs $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL which turns
into this
mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sda
becuase we do
mkfs $* $SCRATCH_DEV
Then btrfs will always show the lowest devid in /proc/mounts to maintain
consistency, so even though we do mount /dev/sda $SCRATCH_MNT, you will see
/dev/sdb as the mounted device in /proc/mounts. So then say the next test wants
to just use $SCRATCH_DEV, it will do _require_scratchdev which will check to see
if $SCRATCH_DEV is mounted, which it will look like it is not because
/proc/mounts shows /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sda, and so it won't umount
$SCRATCH_MNT, and then that test will fail because we can't mkfs the device
because it is busy. I reproduced this on a box that doesn't use /etc/mtab by
doing
./check btrfs/307 generic/015
and 015 would fail. With this patch it passes now. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
---
tests/btrfs/307 | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/307 b/tests/btrfs/307
index 87314c6..15157b3 100644
--- a/tests/btrfs/307
+++ b/tests/btrfs/307
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ _cleanup()
{
cd /
rm -f $tmp.*
+ umount $SCRATCH_MNT
}
# get standard environment, filters and checks
--
1.7.7.6
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests: unmount scratch mnt in test 307
2013-05-03 20:11 ` Josef Bacik
@ 2013-05-03 20:15 ` Eric Sandeen
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-05-03 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josef Bacik; +Cc: xfs, linux-btrfs
On 5/3/13 3:11 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> So if you have a mount command that doesn't use /etc/mtab then it will spit out
> a different device for the mounted device. So say we have
>
> SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
>
> we will turn this into
>
> SCRATCH_DEV="/dev/sda"
> SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
>
> and then when you mkfs this you do _scratch_mkfs $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL which turns
> into this
>
> mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sda
>
> becuase we do
>
> mkfs $* $SCRATCH_DEV
>
> Then btrfs will always show the lowest devid in /proc/mounts to maintain
> consistency, so even though we do mount /dev/sda $SCRATCH_MNT, you will see
> /dev/sdb as the mounted device in /proc/mounts. So then say the next test wants
> to just use $SCRATCH_DEV, it will do _require_scratchdev which will check to see
> if $SCRATCH_DEV is mounted, which it will look like it is not because
> /proc/mounts shows /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sda, and so it won't umount
> $SCRATCH_MNT, and then that test will fail because we can't mkfs the device
> because it is busy. I reproduced this on a box that doesn't use /etc/mtab by
> doing
>
> ./check btrfs/307 generic/015
>
> and 015 would fail. With this patch it passes now. Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> ---
> tests/btrfs/307 | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/307 b/tests/btrfs/307
> index 87314c6..15157b3 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/307
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/307
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ _cleanup()
> {
> cd /
> rm -f $tmp.*
> + umount $SCRATCH_MNT
> }
>
> # get standard environment, filters and checks
>
This seems fine for this particular test.
Is it really a hard requirement that each test unmount SCRATCH_[DEV|MNT] if it used it?
If so, fine... the README does indicate this.
But I wonder if we can make it a little more foolproof by updating _require_scratch
to handle this situation more gracefully?
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests: unmount scratch mnt in test 307
@ 2013-05-03 20:15 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-05-03 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josef Bacik; +Cc: linux-btrfs, xfs
On 5/3/13 3:11 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> So if you have a mount command that doesn't use /etc/mtab then it will spit out
> a different device for the mounted device. So say we have
>
> SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
>
> we will turn this into
>
> SCRATCH_DEV="/dev/sda"
> SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
>
> and then when you mkfs this you do _scratch_mkfs $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL which turns
> into this
>
> mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sda
>
> becuase we do
>
> mkfs $* $SCRATCH_DEV
>
> Then btrfs will always show the lowest devid in /proc/mounts to maintain
> consistency, so even though we do mount /dev/sda $SCRATCH_MNT, you will see
> /dev/sdb as the mounted device in /proc/mounts. So then say the next test wants
> to just use $SCRATCH_DEV, it will do _require_scratchdev which will check to see
> if $SCRATCH_DEV is mounted, which it will look like it is not because
> /proc/mounts shows /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sda, and so it won't umount
> $SCRATCH_MNT, and then that test will fail because we can't mkfs the device
> because it is busy. I reproduced this on a box that doesn't use /etc/mtab by
> doing
>
> ./check btrfs/307 generic/015
>
> and 015 would fail. With this patch it passes now. Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> ---
> tests/btrfs/307 | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/307 b/tests/btrfs/307
> index 87314c6..15157b3 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/307
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/307
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ _cleanup()
> {
> cd /
> rm -f $tmp.*
> + umount $SCRATCH_MNT
> }
>
> # get standard environment, filters and checks
>
This seems fine for this particular test.
Is it really a hard requirement that each test unmount SCRATCH_[DEV|MNT] if it used it?
If so, fine... the README does indicate this.
But I wonder if we can make it a little more foolproof by updating _require_scratch
to handle this situation more gracefully?
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests: unmount scratch mnt in test 307
2013-05-03 20:15 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2013-05-03 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2013-05-03 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: Josef Bacik, linux-btrfs, xfs
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:15:01PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/3/13 3:11 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > So if you have a mount command that doesn't use /etc/mtab then it will spit out
> > a different device for the mounted device. So say we have
> >
> > SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
> >
> > we will turn this into
> >
> > SCRATCH_DEV="/dev/sda"
> > SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
> >
> > and then when you mkfs this you do _scratch_mkfs $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL which turns
> > into this
> >
> > mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sda
> >
> > becuase we do
> >
> > mkfs $* $SCRATCH_DEV
> >
> > Then btrfs will always show the lowest devid in /proc/mounts to maintain
> > consistency, so even though we do mount /dev/sda $SCRATCH_MNT, you will see
> > /dev/sdb as the mounted device in /proc/mounts. So then say the next test wants
> > to just use $SCRATCH_DEV, it will do _require_scratchdev which will check to see
> > if $SCRATCH_DEV is mounted, which it will look like it is not because
> > /proc/mounts shows /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sda, and so it won't umount
> > $SCRATCH_MNT, and then that test will fail because we can't mkfs the device
> > because it is busy. I reproduced this on a box that doesn't use /etc/mtab by
> > doing
> >
> > ./check btrfs/307 generic/015
> >
> > and 015 would fail. With this patch it passes now. Thanks,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> > ---
> > tests/btrfs/307 | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/307 b/tests/btrfs/307
> > index 87314c6..15157b3 100644
> > --- a/tests/btrfs/307
> > +++ b/tests/btrfs/307
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ _cleanup()
> > {
> > cd /
> > rm -f $tmp.*
> > + umount $SCRATCH_MNT
> > }
> >
> > # get standard environment, filters and checks
> >
>
> This seems fine for this particular test.
>
> Is it really a hard requirement that each test unmount SCRATCH_[DEV|MNT] if it used it?
> If so, fine... the README does indicate this.
>
> But I wonder if we can make it a little more foolproof by updating _require_scratch
> to handle this situation more gracefully?
It already tries to unmount $SCRATCH_DEV, and will through an error
if it's not mounted on $SCRATCH_MNT. I guess the opposite checks are
necessary in this case i.e. check that SCRATCH_MNT is not mounted,
and through an error if it's not SCRATCH_DEV that is mounted
there...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests: unmount scratch mnt in test 307
@ 2013-05-03 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2013-05-03 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-btrfs, Josef Bacik, xfs
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:15:01PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/3/13 3:11 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > So if you have a mount command that doesn't use /etc/mtab then it will spit out
> > a different device for the mounted device. So say we have
> >
> > SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
> >
> > we will turn this into
> >
> > SCRATCH_DEV="/dev/sda"
> > SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
> >
> > and then when you mkfs this you do _scratch_mkfs $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL which turns
> > into this
> >
> > mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sda
> >
> > becuase we do
> >
> > mkfs $* $SCRATCH_DEV
> >
> > Then btrfs will always show the lowest devid in /proc/mounts to maintain
> > consistency, so even though we do mount /dev/sda $SCRATCH_MNT, you will see
> > /dev/sdb as the mounted device in /proc/mounts. So then say the next test wants
> > to just use $SCRATCH_DEV, it will do _require_scratchdev which will check to see
> > if $SCRATCH_DEV is mounted, which it will look like it is not because
> > /proc/mounts shows /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sda, and so it won't umount
> > $SCRATCH_MNT, and then that test will fail because we can't mkfs the device
> > because it is busy. I reproduced this on a box that doesn't use /etc/mtab by
> > doing
> >
> > ./check btrfs/307 generic/015
> >
> > and 015 would fail. With this patch it passes now. Thanks,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> > ---
> > tests/btrfs/307 | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/307 b/tests/btrfs/307
> > index 87314c6..15157b3 100644
> > --- a/tests/btrfs/307
> > +++ b/tests/btrfs/307
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ _cleanup()
> > {
> > cd /
> > rm -f $tmp.*
> > + umount $SCRATCH_MNT
> > }
> >
> > # get standard environment, filters and checks
> >
>
> This seems fine for this particular test.
>
> Is it really a hard requirement that each test unmount SCRATCH_[DEV|MNT] if it used it?
> If so, fine... the README does indicate this.
>
> But I wonder if we can make it a little more foolproof by updating _require_scratch
> to handle this situation more gracefully?
It already tries to unmount $SCRATCH_DEV, and will through an error
if it's not mounted on $SCRATCH_MNT. I guess the opposite checks are
necessary in this case i.e. check that SCRATCH_MNT is not mounted,
and through an error if it's not SCRATCH_DEV that is mounted
there...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [BULK] Re: [PATCH] xfstests: unmount scratch mnt in test 307
2013-05-03 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2013-06-26 15:50 ` Josef Bacik
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2013-06-26 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, Josef Bacik, linux-btrfs, xfs
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 07:27:21PM -0400, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:15:01PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On 5/3/13 3:11 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > So if you have a mount command that doesn't use /etc/mtab then it will spit out
> > > a different device for the mounted device. So say we have
> > >
> > > SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
> > >
> > > we will turn this into
> > >
> > > SCRATCH_DEV="/dev/sda"
> > > SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
> > >
> > > and then when you mkfs this you do _scratch_mkfs $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL which turns
> > > into this
> > >
> > > mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sda
> > >
> > > becuase we do
> > >
> > > mkfs $* $SCRATCH_DEV
> > >
> > > Then btrfs will always show the lowest devid in /proc/mounts to maintain
> > > consistency, so even though we do mount /dev/sda $SCRATCH_MNT, you will see
> > > /dev/sdb as the mounted device in /proc/mounts. So then say the next test wants
> > > to just use $SCRATCH_DEV, it will do _require_scratchdev which will check to see
> > > if $SCRATCH_DEV is mounted, which it will look like it is not because
> > > /proc/mounts shows /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sda, and so it won't umount
> > > $SCRATCH_MNT, and then that test will fail because we can't mkfs the device
> > > because it is busy. I reproduced this on a box that doesn't use /etc/mtab by
> > > doing
> > >
> > > ./check btrfs/307 generic/015
> > >
> > > and 015 would fail. With this patch it passes now. Thanks,
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/btrfs/307 | 1 +
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/307 b/tests/btrfs/307
> > > index 87314c6..15157b3 100644
> > > --- a/tests/btrfs/307
> > > +++ b/tests/btrfs/307
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ _cleanup()
> > > {
> > > cd /
> > > rm -f $tmp.*
> > > + umount $SCRATCH_MNT
> > > }
> > >
> > > # get standard environment, filters and checks
> > >
> >
> > This seems fine for this particular test.
> >
> > Is it really a hard requirement that each test unmount SCRATCH_[DEV|MNT] if it used it?
> > If so, fine... the README does indicate this.
> >
> > But I wonder if we can make it a little more foolproof by updating _require_scratch
> > to handle this situation more gracefully?
>
> It already tries to unmount $SCRATCH_DEV, and will through an error
> if it's not mounted on $SCRATCH_MNT. I guess the opposite checks are
> necessary in this case i.e. check that SCRATCH_MNT is not mounted,
> and through an error if it's not SCRATCH_DEV that is mounted
> there...
>
Just realized this never went in and I had forgotten to address y'alls comments,
so I've sent another patch that accomplishes what you asked for and fixes my
problem. Thanks,
Josef
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [BULK] Re: [PATCH] xfstests: unmount scratch mnt in test 307
@ 2013-06-26 15:50 ` Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2013-06-26 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, linux-btrfs, Josef Bacik, xfs
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 07:27:21PM -0400, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:15:01PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On 5/3/13 3:11 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > So if you have a mount command that doesn't use /etc/mtab then it will spit out
> > > a different device for the mounted device. So say we have
> > >
> > > SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
> > >
> > > we will turn this into
> > >
> > > SCRATCH_DEV="/dev/sda"
> > > SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
> > >
> > > and then when you mkfs this you do _scratch_mkfs $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL which turns
> > > into this
> > >
> > > mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sda
> > >
> > > becuase we do
> > >
> > > mkfs $* $SCRATCH_DEV
> > >
> > > Then btrfs will always show the lowest devid in /proc/mounts to maintain
> > > consistency, so even though we do mount /dev/sda $SCRATCH_MNT, you will see
> > > /dev/sdb as the mounted device in /proc/mounts. So then say the next test wants
> > > to just use $SCRATCH_DEV, it will do _require_scratchdev which will check to see
> > > if $SCRATCH_DEV is mounted, which it will look like it is not because
> > > /proc/mounts shows /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sda, and so it won't umount
> > > $SCRATCH_MNT, and then that test will fail because we can't mkfs the device
> > > because it is busy. I reproduced this on a box that doesn't use /etc/mtab by
> > > doing
> > >
> > > ./check btrfs/307 generic/015
> > >
> > > and 015 would fail. With this patch it passes now. Thanks,
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/btrfs/307 | 1 +
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/307 b/tests/btrfs/307
> > > index 87314c6..15157b3 100644
> > > --- a/tests/btrfs/307
> > > +++ b/tests/btrfs/307
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ _cleanup()
> > > {
> > > cd /
> > > rm -f $tmp.*
> > > + umount $SCRATCH_MNT
> > > }
> > >
> > > # get standard environment, filters and checks
> > >
> >
> > This seems fine for this particular test.
> >
> > Is it really a hard requirement that each test unmount SCRATCH_[DEV|MNT] if it used it?
> > If so, fine... the README does indicate this.
> >
> > But I wonder if we can make it a little more foolproof by updating _require_scratch
> > to handle this situation more gracefully?
>
> It already tries to unmount $SCRATCH_DEV, and will through an error
> if it's not mounted on $SCRATCH_MNT. I guess the opposite checks are
> necessary in this case i.e. check that SCRATCH_MNT is not mounted,
> and through an error if it's not SCRATCH_DEV that is mounted
> there...
>
Just realized this never went in and I had forgotten to address y'alls comments,
so I've sent another patch that accomplishes what you asked for and fixes my
problem. Thanks,
Josef
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-26 15:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-03 20:11 [PATCH] xfstests: unmount scratch mnt in test 307 Josef Bacik
2013-05-03 20:11 ` Josef Bacik
2013-05-03 20:15 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-05-03 20:15 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-05-03 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-03 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-26 15:50 ` [BULK] " Josef Bacik
2013-06-26 15:50 ` Josef Bacik
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.