From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: arm@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
Barry Song <baohua.song@csr.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Remove ARM local timer API
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:35:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130708153528.GB830@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130628000853.GB11547@quad.lixom.net>
On 06/27, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 01:02:12PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Olof/Arnd,
> >
> > These patches remove the ARM local timer API. The ARM architected
> > timers have already moved away from this API so this series
> > migrates the rest of the users allowing us to remove the API
> > entirely. Thomas has been kind enough to take the first two
> > patches into timers/core in the tip tree (thanks Thomas!) so I've
> > merged that into v3.10-rc1 and then applied the rest of the
> > patches on top. Let me know if this is acceptable.
>
> We need guarantees from Thomas that the branch is stable and will never be
> rebased before it hit Linus tree, or we'll be in a world of pain for
> dependencies like these.
>
> Thomas, is this branch stable or do you anticipate a rebase?
>
This branch has merged into Linus' tree. Can this go through the
arm-soc tree now?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] Remove ARM local timer API
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:35:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130708153528.GB830@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130628000853.GB11547@quad.lixom.net>
On 06/27, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 01:02:12PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Olof/Arnd,
> >
> > These patches remove the ARM local timer API. The ARM architected
> > timers have already moved away from this API so this series
> > migrates the rest of the users allowing us to remove the API
> > entirely. Thomas has been kind enough to take the first two
> > patches into timers/core in the tip tree (thanks Thomas!) so I've
> > merged that into v3.10-rc1 and then applied the rest of the
> > patches on top. Let me know if this is acceptable.
>
> We need guarantees from Thomas that the branch is stable and will never be
> rebased before it hit Linus tree, or we'll be in a world of pain for
> dependencies like these.
>
> Thomas, is this branch stable or do you anticipate a rebase?
>
This branch has merged into Linus' tree. Can this go through the
arm-soc tree now?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-08 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 20:02 [GIT PULL] Remove ARM local timer API Stephen Boyd
2013-06-25 20:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-06-26 1:06 ` Barry Song
2013-06-26 1:06 ` Barry Song
2013-06-28 0:08 ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-28 0:08 ` Olof Johansson
2013-07-08 15:35 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-07-08 15:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 21:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 21:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-19 7:24 ` Olof Johansson
2013-07-19 7:24 ` Olof Johansson
2013-07-23 22:10 ` Olof Johansson
2013-07-23 22:10 ` Olof Johansson
2013-07-23 23:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-23 23:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-23 23:56 ` Olof Johansson
2013-07-23 23:56 ` Olof Johansson
2013-07-25 16:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-25 16:13 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130708153528.GB830@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baohua.song@csr.com \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.