From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
To: <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
<arnd@arndb.de>, <olof@lixom.net>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
<rob.herring@calxeda.com>, <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
<rjw@sisk.pl>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>, <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/11] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:26:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130716012559.GB28375@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373883732-26303-8-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:22:08AM +0100, Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
>
> Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available)
> appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant.
>
> This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com
Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
rjw@sisk.pl, grant.likely@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com,
kernel@pengutronix.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
olof@lixom.net, gregory.clement@free-electrons.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/11] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:26:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130716012559.GB28375@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373883732-26303-8-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:22:08AM +0100, Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
>
> Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available)
> appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant.
>
> This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: shawn.guo@linaro.org (Shawn Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/11] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:26:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130716012559.GB28375@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373883732-26303-8-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:22:08AM +0100, Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
>
> Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available)
> appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant.
>
> This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-15 10:22 [RFC PATCH 00/11] ARM: DT: update cpu device of_node Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-16 6:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-16 6:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_of_get_cpu_node Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 19:10 ` Rob Herring
2013-07-15 19:10 ` Rob Herring
2013-07-16 6:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-16 6:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-16 9:03 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-16 9:03 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-16 9:03 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-16 9:03 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:16 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:16 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:16 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:16 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-16 1:22 ` Shawn Guo
2013-07-16 1:22 ` Shawn Guo
2013-07-16 1:22 ` Shawn Guo
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-16 1:26 ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2013-07-16 1:26 ` Shawn Guo
2013-07-16 1:26 ` Shawn Guo
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-15 10:22 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-16 6:31 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] ARM: DT: update cpu device of_node Viresh Kumar
2013-07-16 6:31 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130716012559.GB28375@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net \
--to=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.