[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mx6qsabrelite: Remove mx6qsabrelite code in favor of nitrogen6x

From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mx6qsabrelite: Remove mx6qsabrelite code in favor of nitrogen6x
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:10:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130717111003.4357fb83@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E6500D.2090909@denx.de>

Hi Stefano,

On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:04:29 +0200, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
wrote:

> Hi Albert,
> 
> On 17/07/2013 09:42, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Fabio,
> > 
> > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:29:28 -0300, Fabio Estevam
> > <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> mx6qsabrelite and nitrogen6q boards are hardware compatible, so let's avoid the
> >> code duplication and only use the nitrogen6x source code to make board code
> >> maintainance easier.
> >>
> >> Tested booting a mainline device tree kernel on a mx6qsabrelite board.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Hmm, why does this patch not show on Patchwork? Only its V1 does.
> > 
> 
> I am struggling for finding it, too. I have already seen a similar case
> in the past. Otavio remarked that when there is a rename, patchwork is
> not able to track it (bug in patchwork).

Since we have a clear example (and on the patchwork site where the
patchwork folks can dig as deep as they need), we could bring this up
to the patchwork list, with the M-IDs of the V1 and V2 patches.

I'd rather someone with a handle to the U-Boot mailing list do it, as
it may require digging there too.

Wolfgang?

> Stefano

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.