* [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
@ 2013-07-18 16:56 ` Jerry
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jerry @ 2013-07-18 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Jerry
When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
integral multiple of 1MB.
Signed-off-by: Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index b100255..cd41797 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5745,9 +5745,11 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
if (!numentries) {
/* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
numentries = nr_kernel_pages;
- numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
- numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
- numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
+ if (20 > PAGE_SHIFT) {
+ numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
+ numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
+ numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
+ }
/* limit to 1 bucket per 2^scale bytes of low memory */
if (scale > PAGE_SHIFT)
--
1.8.1.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
@ 2013-07-18 16:56 ` Jerry
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jerry @ 2013-07-18 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Jerry
When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
integral multiple of 1MB.
Signed-off-by: Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index b100255..cd41797 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5745,9 +5745,11 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
if (!numentries) {
/* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
numentries = nr_kernel_pages;
- numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
- numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
- numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
+ if (20 > PAGE_SHIFT) {
+ numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
+ numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
+ numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
+ }
/* limit to 1 bucket per 2^scale bytes of low memory */
if (scale > PAGE_SHIFT)
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
2013-07-18 16:56 ` Jerry
@ 2013-07-18 17:13 ` John Stoffel
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: John Stoffel @ 2013-07-18 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jerry; +Cc: akpm, zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
Jerry> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
Jerry> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
Jerry> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
Jerry> integral multiple of 1MB.
Why this magic number of 20? Please explain it better and replace it
was a #define that means something here.
Jerry> Signed-off-by: Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com>
Jerry> ---
Jerry> mm/page_alloc.c | 8 +++++---
Jerry> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Jerry> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
Jerry> index b100255..cd41797 100644
Jerry> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
Jerry> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
Jerry> @@ -5745,9 +5745,11 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
Jerry> if (!numentries) {
Jerry> /* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
Jerry> numentries = nr_kernel_pages;
Jerry> - numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
Jerry> - numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
Jerry> - numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
Jerry> + if (20 > PAGE_SHIFT) {
Jerry> + numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
Jerry> + numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
Jerry> + numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
Jerry> + }
Jerry> /* limit to 1 bucket per 2^scale bytes of low memory */
Jerry> if (scale > PAGE_SHIFT)
Jerry> --
Jerry> 1.8.1.5
Jerry> --
Jerry> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Jerry> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Jerry> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jerry> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
@ 2013-07-18 17:13 ` John Stoffel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: John Stoffel @ 2013-07-18 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jerry; +Cc: akpm, zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
Jerry> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
Jerry> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
Jerry> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
Jerry> integral multiple of 1MB.
Why this magic number of 20? Please explain it better and replace it
was a #define that means something here.
Jerry> Signed-off-by: Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com>
Jerry> ---
Jerry> mm/page_alloc.c | 8 +++++---
Jerry> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Jerry> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
Jerry> index b100255..cd41797 100644
Jerry> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
Jerry> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
Jerry> @@ -5745,9 +5745,11 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
Jerry> if (!numentries) {
Jerry> /* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
Jerry> numentries = nr_kernel_pages;
Jerry> - numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
Jerry> - numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
Jerry> - numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
Jerry> + if (20 > PAGE_SHIFT) {
Jerry> + numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
Jerry> + numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
Jerry> + numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
Jerry> + }
Jerry> /* limit to 1 bucket per 2^scale bytes of low memory */
Jerry> if (scale > PAGE_SHIFT)
Jerry> --
Jerry> 1.8.1.5
Jerry> --
Jerry> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Jerry> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Jerry> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jerry> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
2013-07-18 17:13 ` John Stoffel
@ 2013-07-18 17:21 ` Jerry
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jerry @ 2013-07-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Stoffel
Cc: Andrew Morton, zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
> Jerry> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
> Jerry> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
> Jerry> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
> Jerry> integral multiple of 1MB.
>
> Why this magic number of 20? Please explain it better and replace it
> was a #define that means something here.
Because 2^20 = 1MB.
The intention of previous code is "/* round applicable memory size up
to nearest megabyte */".
>
> Jerry> Signed-off-by: Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com>
> Jerry> ---
> Jerry> mm/page_alloc.c | 8 +++++---
> Jerry> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Jerry> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> Jerry> index b100255..cd41797 100644
> Jerry> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> Jerry> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> Jerry> @@ -5745,9 +5745,11 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
> Jerry> if (!numentries) {
> Jerry> /* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
> Jerry> numentries = nr_kernel_pages;
> Jerry> - numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
> Jerry> - numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
> Jerry> - numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
> Jerry> + if (20 > PAGE_SHIFT) {
> Jerry> + numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
> Jerry> + numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
> Jerry> + numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
> Jerry> + }
>
> Jerry> /* limit to 1 bucket per 2^scale bytes of low memory */
> Jerry> if (scale > PAGE_SHIFT)
> Jerry> --
> Jerry> 1.8.1.5
>
> Jerry> --
> Jerry> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> Jerry> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Jerry> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Jerry> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
I love linux!!!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
@ 2013-07-18 17:21 ` Jerry
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jerry @ 2013-07-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Stoffel
Cc: Andrew Morton, zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
> Jerry> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
> Jerry> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
> Jerry> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
> Jerry> integral multiple of 1MB.
>
> Why this magic number of 20? Please explain it better and replace it
> was a #define that means something here.
Because 2^20 = 1MB.
The intention of previous code is "/* round applicable memory size up
to nearest megabyte */".
>
> Jerry> Signed-off-by: Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com>
> Jerry> ---
> Jerry> mm/page_alloc.c | 8 +++++---
> Jerry> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Jerry> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> Jerry> index b100255..cd41797 100644
> Jerry> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> Jerry> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> Jerry> @@ -5745,9 +5745,11 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
> Jerry> if (!numentries) {
> Jerry> /* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
> Jerry> numentries = nr_kernel_pages;
> Jerry> - numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
> Jerry> - numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
> Jerry> - numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
> Jerry> + if (20 > PAGE_SHIFT) {
> Jerry> + numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
> Jerry> + numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
> Jerry> + numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
> Jerry> + }
>
> Jerry> /* limit to 1 bucket per 2^scale bytes of low memory */
> Jerry> if (scale > PAGE_SHIFT)
> Jerry> --
> Jerry> 1.8.1.5
>
> Jerry> --
> Jerry> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> Jerry> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Jerry> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Jerry> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
I love linux!!!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
2013-07-18 16:56 ` Jerry
@ 2013-07-18 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2013-07-18 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jerry; +Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:56:12 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
> integral multiple of 1MB.
>
If you tell me that you have a machine which has PAGE_SIZE=2MB and this
was the only problem which prevented Linux from running on that machine
then I'll apply the patch ;)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
@ 2013-07-18 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2013-07-18 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jerry; +Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:56:12 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
> integral multiple of 1MB.
>
If you tell me that you have a machine which has PAGE_SIZE=2MB and this
was the only problem which prevented Linux from running on that machine
then I'll apply the patch ;)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
2013-07-18 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2013-07-18 23:47 ` Jerry
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jerry @ 2013-07-18 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
2013/7/19 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:56:12 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
>> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
>> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
>> integral multiple of 1MB.
>>
>
> If you tell me that you have a machine which has PAGE_SIZE=2MB and this
> was the only problem which prevented Linux from running on that machine
> then I'll apply the patch ;)
>
Hi Morton:
I just "grep -rn "#define\s\+PAGE_SHIFT" arch/", and find the
PAGE_SHIFT in some architecture is very big.
such as the following in "arch/hexagon/include/asm/page.h"
....
#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_256KB
#define PAGE_SHIFT 18
#define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_256KB
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_1MB
#define PAGE_SHIFT 20
#define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_1MB
#endif
.....
Maybe the day of "A 2MB page" is not far. :-) I know it is just a
latent issue. Even if it won't generate a error when PAGE_SIZE == 20,
the calculating here is not necessary. In my mind, compiler would
optimize the calculating at that situation. But it is a little tricky.
In my patch, I think compiler would optimize "if (20 > PAGE_SIZE)", it
won't generate any machine instruction. Just a guarantee.
--
I love linux!!!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
@ 2013-07-18 23:47 ` Jerry
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jerry @ 2013-07-18 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
2013/7/19 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:56:12 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
>> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
>> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
>> integral multiple of 1MB.
>>
>
> If you tell me that you have a machine which has PAGE_SIZE=2MB and this
> was the only problem which prevented Linux from running on that machine
> then I'll apply the patch ;)
>
Hi Morton:
I just "grep -rn "#define\s\+PAGE_SHIFT" arch/", and find the
PAGE_SHIFT in some architecture is very big.
such as the following in "arch/hexagon/include/asm/page.h"
....
#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_256KB
#define PAGE_SHIFT 18
#define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_256KB
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_1MB
#define PAGE_SHIFT 20
#define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_1MB
#endif
.....
Maybe the day of "A 2MB page" is not far. :-) I know it is just a
latent issue. Even if it won't generate a error when PAGE_SIZE == 20,
the calculating here is not necessary. In my mind, compiler would
optimize the calculating at that situation. But it is a little tricky.
In my patch, I think compiler would optimize "if (20 > PAGE_SIZE)", it
won't generate any machine instruction. Just a guarantee.
--
I love linux!!!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
2013-07-18 23:47 ` Jerry
@ 2013-07-19 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2013-07-19 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jerry; +Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:47:02 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/7/19 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
> > On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:56:12 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
> >> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
> >> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
> >> integral multiple of 1MB.
> >>
> >
> > If you tell me that you have a machine which has PAGE_SIZE=2MB and this
> > was the only problem which prevented Linux from running on that machine
> > then I'll apply the patch ;)
> >
>
> Hi Morton:
> I just "grep -rn "#define\s\+PAGE_SHIFT" arch/", and find the
> PAGE_SHIFT in some architecture is very big.
> such as the following in "arch/hexagon/include/asm/page.h"
> ....
> #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_256KB
> #define PAGE_SHIFT 18
> #define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_256KB
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_1MB
> #define PAGE_SHIFT 20
> #define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_1MB
> #endif
> .....
Good heavens.
> In my patch, I think compiler would optimize "if (20 > PAGE_SIZE)", it
> won't generate any machine instruction. Just a guarantee.
Well the existing code is a bit silly looking. Why can't we just do
/* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
if (PAGE_SHIFT < 20)
numentries = round_up(nr_kernel_pages, (1 << 20)/PAGE_SIZE);
or similar?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
@ 2013-07-19 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2013-07-19 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jerry; +Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:47:02 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/7/19 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
> > On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:56:12 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
> >> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
> >> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
> >> integral multiple of 1MB.
> >>
> >
> > If you tell me that you have a machine which has PAGE_SIZE=2MB and this
> > was the only problem which prevented Linux from running on that machine
> > then I'll apply the patch ;)
> >
>
> Hi Morton:
> I just "grep -rn "#define\s\+PAGE_SHIFT" arch/", and find the
> PAGE_SHIFT in some architecture is very big.
> such as the following in "arch/hexagon/include/asm/page.h"
> ....
> #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_256KB
> #define PAGE_SHIFT 18
> #define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_256KB
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_1MB
> #define PAGE_SHIFT 20
> #define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_1MB
> #endif
> .....
Good heavens.
> In my patch, I think compiler would optimize "if (20 > PAGE_SIZE)", it
> won't generate any machine instruction. Just a guarantee.
Well the existing code is a bit silly looking. Why can't we just do
/* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
if (PAGE_SHIFT < 20)
numentries = round_up(nr_kernel_pages, (1 << 20)/PAGE_SIZE);
or similar?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
2013-07-19 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2013-07-20 17:16 ` Jerry
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jerry @ 2013-07-20 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
2013/7/20 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:47:02 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2013/7/19 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
>> > On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:56:12 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
>> >> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
>> >> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
>> >> integral multiple of 1MB.
>> >>
>> >
>> > If you tell me that you have a machine which has PAGE_SIZE=2MB and this
>> > was the only problem which prevented Linux from running on that machine
>> > then I'll apply the patch ;)
>> >
>>
>> Hi Morton:
>> I just "grep -rn "#define\s\+PAGE_SHIFT" arch/", and find the
>> PAGE_SHIFT in some architecture is very big.
>> such as the following in "arch/hexagon/include/asm/page.h"
>> ....
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_256KB
>> #define PAGE_SHIFT 18
>> #define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_256KB
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_1MB
>> #define PAGE_SHIFT 20
>> #define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_1MB
>> #endif
>> .....
>
> Good heavens.
>
>> In my patch, I think compiler would optimize "if (20 > PAGE_SIZE)", it
>> won't generate any machine instruction. Just a guarantee.
>
> Well the existing code is a bit silly looking. Why can't we just do
>
> /* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
> if (PAGE_SHIFT < 20)
> numentries = round_up(nr_kernel_pages, (1 << 20)/PAGE_SIZE);
>
> or similar?
Great. I have adjusted these code lines, and sent the latest one.
--
I love linux!!!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
@ 2013-07-20 17:16 ` Jerry
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jerry @ 2013-07-20 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, linux-mm, linux-kernel
2013/7/20 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:47:02 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2013/7/19 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
>> > On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:56:12 +0800 Jerry <uulinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
>> >> calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In addition, if
>> >> PAGE_SHIFT > 20, The memory size represented by numentries was already
>> >> integral multiple of 1MB.
>> >>
>> >
>> > If you tell me that you have a machine which has PAGE_SIZE=2MB and this
>> > was the only problem which prevented Linux from running on that machine
>> > then I'll apply the patch ;)
>> >
>>
>> Hi Morton:
>> I just "grep -rn "#define\s\+PAGE_SHIFT" arch/", and find the
>> PAGE_SHIFT in some architecture is very big.
>> such as the following in "arch/hexagon/include/asm/page.h"
>> ....
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_256KB
>> #define PAGE_SHIFT 18
>> #define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_256KB
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_1MB
>> #define PAGE_SHIFT 20
>> #define HEXAGON_L1_PTE_SIZE __HVM_PDE_S_1MB
>> #endif
>> .....
>
> Good heavens.
>
>> In my patch, I think compiler would optimize "if (20 > PAGE_SIZE)", it
>> won't generate any machine instruction. Just a guarantee.
>
> Well the existing code is a bit silly looking. Why can't we just do
>
> /* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
> if (PAGE_SHIFT < 20)
> numentries = round_up(nr_kernel_pages, (1 << 20)/PAGE_SIZE);
>
> or similar?
Great. I have adjusted these code lines, and sent the latest one.
--
I love linux!!!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
@ 2013-07-20 17:12 ` Jerry Zhou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Zhou @ 2013-07-20 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, chunhua.zhou, linux-mm, linux-kernel,
Jerry Zhou
When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
previous calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In
addition, if PAGE_SIZE >= 1MB, The memory size of "numentries" was
already integral multiple of 1MB.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Zhou <uulinux@gmail.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index b100255..7c469c6 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5745,9 +5745,10 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
if (!numentries) {
/* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
numentries = nr_kernel_pages;
- numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
- numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
- numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ /* It isn't necessary when PAGE_SIZE >= 1MB */
+ if (PAGE_SHIFT < 20)
+ numentries = round_up(numentries, (1<<20)/PAGE_SIZE);
/* limit to 1 bucket per 2^scale bytes of low memory */
if (scale > PAGE_SHIFT)
--
1.8.1.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20
@ 2013-07-20 17:12 ` Jerry Zhou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Zhou @ 2013-07-20 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: zhuwei.lu, tianfu.huang, chunhua.zhou, linux-mm, linux-kernel,
Jerry Zhou
When PAGE_SHIFT > 20, the result of "20 - PAGE_SHIFT" is negative. The
previous calculating here will generate an unexpected result. In
addition, if PAGE_SIZE >= 1MB, The memory size of "numentries" was
already integral multiple of 1MB.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Zhou <uulinux@gmail.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index b100255..7c469c6 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5745,9 +5745,10 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
if (!numentries) {
/* round applicable memory size up to nearest megabyte */
numentries = nr_kernel_pages;
- numentries += (1UL << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1;
- numentries >>= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
- numentries <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ /* It isn't necessary when PAGE_SIZE >= 1MB */
+ if (PAGE_SHIFT < 20)
+ numentries = round_up(numentries, (1<<20)/PAGE_SIZE);
/* limit to 1 bucket per 2^scale bytes of low memory */
if (scale > PAGE_SHIFT)
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-20 17:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-18 16:56 [PATCH] mm: negative left shift count when PAGE_SHIFT > 20 Jerry
2013-07-18 16:56 ` Jerry
2013-07-18 17:13 ` John Stoffel
2013-07-18 17:13 ` John Stoffel
2013-07-18 17:21 ` Jerry
2013-07-18 17:21 ` Jerry
2013-07-18 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-18 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-18 23:47 ` Jerry
2013-07-18 23:47 ` Jerry
2013-07-19 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-19 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-20 17:16 ` Jerry
2013-07-20 17:16 ` Jerry
2013-07-20 17:12 Jerry Zhou
2013-07-20 17:12 ` Jerry Zhou
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.