[PATCH] qtbase-native_5.0.2: Also use gcc 4.8 fix for the native package.

[PATCH] qtbase-native_5.0.2: Also use gcc 4.8 fix for the native package.

[Stefan Schmidt]

When running on a host with gcc 4.8 we run into a compile problem with stricter
gcc. This was already fixed for the target packages so we only re-use the patch.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
---
 recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase-native_5.0.2.bb | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase-native_5.0.2.bb b/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase-native_5.0.2.bb
index 3df434e..c7b405a 100644
--- a/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase-native_5.0.2.bb
+++ b/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase-native_5.0.2.bb
@@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
 require qt5-${PV}.inc
 require ${PN}.inc
 
-PR = "${INC_PR}.0"
+PR = "${INC_PR}.1"
+
+SRC_URI += " \
+    file://0017-Rename-qAbs-Function-for-timeval.patch \
+"
 
 SRC_URI[md5sum] = "a4fec8ed03867c4ee4fe5a46001a11f0"
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "31851ee2f844c100554506a9a446d4b6abb5270bca799c2a683e5f937456a9c8"
-- 
1.8.3.2

Re: [PATCH] qtbase-native_5.0.2: Also use gcc 4.8 fix for the native package.

[Eric Bénard]

Hi Stefan,

Le Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:47:11 +0100,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org> a écrit :

> When running on a host with gcc 4.8 we run into a compile problem with stricter
> gcc. This was already fixed for the target packages so we only re-use the patch.
> 
that's already fixed :
https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5/commit/75291e7614115dc89045fcf6650bbdead071da03

Eric

Re: [PATCH] qtbase-native_5.0.2: Also use gcc 4.8 fix for the native package.

[Stefan Schmidt]

Hello.

On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 15:49, Eric Bénard wrote:
> 
> Le Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:47:11 +0100,
> Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org> a écrit :
> 
> > When running on a host with gcc 4.8 we run into a compile problem with stricter
> > gcc. This was already fixed for the target packages so we only re-use the patch.
> > 
> that's already fixed :
> https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5/commit/75291e7614115dc89045fcf6650bbdead071da03

Indeed. The setup I was working with had the meta-qt layer pinned to a
rev before your change. I totally did not realise that and made my
patch base don thois old rev.

Sorry for the noise and thanks for pointing it out. :)

regards
Stefan Schmidt