From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: O_TMPFILE fs corruption (Re: Linux 3.11-rc4)
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 01:26:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130805082646.GA14689@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFw9AY2GLC3xieuy7jgFwsUePJ+kety-AHqFxkP1pPUAVw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 08:45:16PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The patch looks right to me - we should pass in similar flags for the
> create case as for tmpfile to the filesystem.
>
> But let's make sure we're all on the same page. Al?
Given all the problems and very limited fs support I'd much prefer
disabling O_TMPFILE for this release. That'd give it the needed
exposure it was missing by being merged without any previous public
review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-05 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-04 21:09 Linux 3.11-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2013-08-05 2:34 ` O_TMPFILE fs corruption (Re: Linux 3.11-rc4) Andy Lutomirski
2013-08-05 3:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-05 4:45 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2013-08-05 8:26 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2013-08-05 16:04 ` Jörn Engel
2013-08-05 14:31 ` Al Viro
2013-08-05 4:20 ` Linux 3.11-rc4 Felipe Contreras
2013-08-05 13:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 14:27 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-05 14:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 17:02 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-05 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 17:40 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-05 17:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-05 17:43 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-05 18:08 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-05 17:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 18:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-05 18:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-06 15:43 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: Linux 3.11-rc4) Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-06 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] Revert "ptrace: PTRACE_DETACH should do flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(child)" Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-07 12:05 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: Linux 3.11-rc4) Grazvydas Ignotas
2013-08-07 17:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-07 19:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-07 19:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-07 19:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-08 15:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-08 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-08 16:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-08 18:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-09 16:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-09 17:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130805082646.GA14689@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.