All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch] drm/i915: precedence bug in hsw_compute_wm_results()
@ 2013-08-09  9:43 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2013-08-09  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel, kernel-janitors

The '!' operation has higher precedence than the compare so probably
this test is never true.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index a5a9959..0b9d9a7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2562,7 +2562,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
 	 * a WM level. */
 	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
 	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
-		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
+		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val <= lp_maximums->fbc) {
 			results->enable_fbc_wm = false;
 			lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val = 0;
 		}

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [patch] drm/i915: precedence bug in hsw_compute_wm_results()
@ 2013-08-09  9:43 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2013-08-09  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel, kernel-janitors

The '!' operation has higher precedence than the compare so probably
this test is never true.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index a5a9959..0b9d9a7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2562,7 +2562,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
 	 * a WM level. */
 	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
 	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
-		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
+		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val <= lp_maximums->fbc) {
 			results->enable_fbc_wm = false;
 			lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val = 0;
 		}

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] drm/i915: precedence bug in hsw_compute_wm_results()
  2013-08-09  9:43 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2013-08-09  9:58   ` Chris Wilson
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2013-08-09  9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:43:02PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The '!' operation has higher precedence than the compare so probably
> this test is never true.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index a5a9959..0b9d9a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2562,7 +2562,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	 * a WM level. */
>  	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
>  	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> -		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
> +		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val <= lp_maximums->fbc) {

I didn't spot that '!' at all. It's a stray and should be just removed.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] drm/i915: precedence bug in hsw_compute_wm_results()
@ 2013-08-09  9:58   ` Chris Wilson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2013-08-09  9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:43:02PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The '!' operation has higher precedence than the compare so probably
> this test is never true.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index a5a9959..0b9d9a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2562,7 +2562,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	 * a WM level. */
>  	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
>  	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> -		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
> +		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val <= lp_maximums->fbc) {

I didn't spot that '!' at all. It's a stray and should be just removed.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] drm/i915: precedence bug in hsw_compute_wm_results()
  2013-08-09  9:43 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2013-08-09 10:04   ` Ville Syrjälä
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2013-08-09 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:43:02PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The '!' operation has higher precedence than the compare so probably
> this test is never true.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index a5a9959..0b9d9a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2562,7 +2562,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	 * a WM level. */
>  	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
>  	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> -		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
> +		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val <= lp_maximums->fbc) {

Whoops. My bad.

It should still be > but ! should just be dropped.

>  			results->enable_fbc_wm = false;
>  			lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val = 0;
>  		}
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] drm/i915: precedence bug in hsw_compute_wm_results()
@ 2013-08-09 10:04   ` Ville Syrjälä
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2013-08-09 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:43:02PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The '!' operation has higher precedence than the compare so probably
> this test is never true.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index a5a9959..0b9d9a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2562,7 +2562,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	 * a WM level. */
>  	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
>  	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> -		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
> +		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val <= lp_maximums->fbc) {

Whoops. My bad.

It should still be > but ! should just be dropped.

>  			results->enable_fbc_wm = false;
>  			lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val = 0;
>  		}
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [patch v2] drm/i915: fix a limit check in hsw_compute_wm_results()
  2013-08-09  9:58   ` Chris Wilson
@ 2013-08-09 10:07     ` Dan Carpenter
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2013-08-09 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter, Chris Wilson
  Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel, kernel-janitors

The '!' here was not intended.  Since '!' has higher precedence than
compare, it means the check is never true.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
v2: My first patch was wrong.

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 96234c6..0f5eb21 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2685,7 +2685,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
 	 * a WM level. */
 	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
 	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
-		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
+		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
 			results->enable_fbc_wm = false;
 			lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val = 0;
 		}

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [patch v2] drm/i915: fix a limit check in hsw_compute_wm_results()
@ 2013-08-09 10:07     ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2013-08-09 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter, Chris Wilson
  Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel, kernel-janitors

The '!' here was not intended.  Since '!' has higher precedence than
compare, it means the check is never true.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
v2: My first patch was wrong.

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 96234c6..0f5eb21 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2685,7 +2685,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
 	 * a WM level. */
 	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
 	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
-		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
+		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
 			results->enable_fbc_wm = false;
 			lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val = 0;
 		}

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch v2] drm/i915: fix a limit check in hsw_compute_wm_results()
  2013-08-09 10:07     ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2013-08-09 10:29       ` Ville Syrjälä
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2013-08-09 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Daniel Vetter, Chris Wilson, David Airlie, intel-gfx,
	kernel-janitors, dri-devel

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:07:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The '!' here was not intended.  Since '!' has higher precedence than
> compare, it means the check is never true.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

The culprit for Daniel:

commit 71fff20ff1bb790f4defe0c880e028581ffab420
Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue Aug 6 22:24:03 2013 +0300

    drm/i915: Kill fbc_enable from hsw_lp_wm_results

> ---
> v2: My first patch was wrong.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 96234c6..0f5eb21 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2685,7 +2685,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	 * a WM level. */
>  	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
>  	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> -		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
> +		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
>  			results->enable_fbc_wm = false;
>  			lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val = 0;
>  		}
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch v2] drm/i915: fix a limit check in hsw_compute_wm_results()
@ 2013-08-09 10:29       ` Ville Syrjälä
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2013-08-09 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Daniel Vetter, Chris Wilson, David Airlie, intel-gfx,
	kernel-janitors, dri-devel

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:07:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The '!' here was not intended.  Since '!' has higher precedence than
> compare, it means the check is never true.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

The culprit for Daniel:

commit 71fff20ff1bb790f4defe0c880e028581ffab420
Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue Aug 6 22:24:03 2013 +0300

    drm/i915: Kill fbc_enable from hsw_lp_wm_results

> ---
> v2: My first patch was wrong.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 96234c6..0f5eb21 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2685,7 +2685,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	 * a WM level. */
>  	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
>  	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> -		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
> +		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
>  			results->enable_fbc_wm = false;
>  			lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val = 0;
>  		}
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch v2] drm/i915: fix a limit check in hsw_compute_wm_results()
  2013-08-09 10:29       ` Ville Syrjälä
@ 2013-08-09 16:27         ` Daniel Vetter
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2013-08-09 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ville Syrjälä
  Cc: Dan Carpenter, Daniel Vetter, Chris Wilson, David Airlie,
	intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:29:33PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:07:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The '!' here was not intended.  Since '!' has higher precedence than
> > compare, it means the check is never true.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The culprit for Daniel:
> 
> commit 71fff20ff1bb790f4defe0c880e028581ffab420
> Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Date:   Tue Aug 6 22:24:03 2013 +0300
> 
>     drm/i915: Kill fbc_enable from hsw_lp_wm_results

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
> 
> > ---
> > v2: My first patch was wrong.
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 96234c6..0f5eb21 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -2685,7 +2685,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  	 * a WM level. */
> >  	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
> >  	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > -		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
> > +		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
> >  			results->enable_fbc_wm = false;
> >  			lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val = 0;
> >  		}
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch v2] drm/i915: fix a limit check in hsw_compute_wm_results()
@ 2013-08-09 16:27         ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2013-08-09 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ville Syrjälä
  Cc: Dan Carpenter, Daniel Vetter, Chris Wilson, David Airlie,
	intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, dri-devel

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:29:33PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:07:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The '!' here was not intended.  Since '!' has higher precedence than
> > compare, it means the check is never true.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The culprit for Daniel:
> 
> commit 71fff20ff1bb790f4defe0c880e028581ffab420
> Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Date:   Tue Aug 6 22:24:03 2013 +0300
> 
>     drm/i915: Kill fbc_enable from hsw_lp_wm_results

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
> 
> > ---
> > v2: My first patch was wrong.
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 96234c6..0f5eb21 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -2685,7 +2685,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  	 * a WM level. */
> >  	results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
> >  	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > -		if (!lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
> > +		if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
> >  			results->enable_fbc_wm = false;
> >  			lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val = 0;
> >  		}
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-08-09 16:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-08-09  9:43 [patch] drm/i915: precedence bug in hsw_compute_wm_results() Dan Carpenter
2013-08-09  9:43 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-08-09  9:58 ` Chris Wilson
2013-08-09  9:58   ` Chris Wilson
2013-08-09 10:07   ` [patch v2] drm/i915: fix a limit check " Dan Carpenter
2013-08-09 10:07     ` Dan Carpenter
2013-08-09 10:29     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2013-08-09 10:29       ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-08-09 16:27       ` Daniel Vetter
2013-08-09 16:27         ` Daniel Vetter
2013-08-09 10:04 ` [patch] drm/i915: precedence bug " Ville Syrjälä
2013-08-09 10:04   ` Ville Syrjälä

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.