[RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Mike Dunn]

This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
for inverted polarity is also added.

Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).

Signed-off-by: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>
---
Changle log:
Resent with expanded Cc list
v2:
- of_match_table contains only the "pxa250-pwm" compatible string; require one
  device instance per pwm
- add Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
- add support for polarity flag in DT and implement set_polarity() method
  (the treo 680 inverts the signal between pwm out and backlight)
- return -EINVAL instead of -ENODEV if platform data or DT node not found
- output dev_info string if platform data missing
- expanded CC list of patch

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt | 33 +++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi                     | 24 ++++++++++
 drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c                             | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7b09bfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+Marvell pwm controller
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible:
+  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
+  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
+  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
+  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
+- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
+   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
+   cell 2: the period in nanoseconds,
+   cell 3: flags; set bit 0 to specify inverse polarity.  The pwm controller
+   does not implement reverse polarity, but some boards may pass the pwm output
+   through an external inverter, which can cause problems if a client device
+   assumes that an increase in the duty cycle results in an increase in output
+   power.  The pwm-backlight is an example of such a client.
+
+Example pwm device node:
+
+pwm0: pwm@40b00000 {
+	compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+	reg = <0x40b00000 0x10>;
+	#pwm-cells = <3>;
+};
+
+Example pwm client node:
+
+backlight {
+      	compatible = "pwm-backlight";
+     	pwms = <&pwm0 0 5000000 1>;  /* pwm output is inverted */
+	...
+}
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi
index d7c5d72..a12fe8e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi
@@ -10,5 +10,29 @@
 			marvell,intc-priority;
 			marvell,intc-nr-irqs = <34>;
 		};
+
+		pwm0: pwm@40b00000 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40b00000 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
+
+		pwm1: pwm@40b00010 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40b00010 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
+
+		pwm2: pwm@40c00000 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40c00000 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
+
+		pwm3: pwm@40c00010 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40c00010 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
 	};
 };
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
index a4d2164..33e6a7d 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 
 #include <asm/div64.h>
 
@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ struct pxa_pwm_chip {
 
 	struct clk	*clk;
 	void __iomem	*mmio_base;
+	enum pwm_polarity polarity;
 };
 
 static inline struct pxa_pwm_chip *to_pxa_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
@@ -88,6 +90,15 @@ static int pxa_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	else
 		dc = (pv + 1) * duty_ns / period_ns;
 
+	if (pc->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) {
+		if (dc & PWMDCR_FD)
+			dc = 0;	        /* continuously low */
+		else if (dc == 0)
+			dc = PWMDCR_FD; /* continuously high */
+		else
+			dc = 1023 - dc; /* complement duty cycle */
+	}
+
 	/* NOTE: the clock to PWM has to be enabled first
 	 * before writing to the registers
 	 */
@@ -117,13 +128,51 @@ static void pxa_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
 }
 
+static int pxa_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				enum pwm_polarity polarity)
+{
+	struct pxa_pwm_chip *pc = to_pxa_pwm_chip(chip);
+	pc->polarity = polarity;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct pwm_ops pxa_pwm_ops = {
 	.config = pxa_pwm_config,
 	.enable = pxa_pwm_enable,
 	.disable = pxa_pwm_disable,
+	.set_polarity = pxa_pwm_set_polarity,
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+/*
+ * Device tree users should create one device instance for each pwm channel.
+ * Hence we dispense with the HAS_SECONDARY_PWM and "tell" the original driver
+ * code that this is a single channel pxa25x-pwm.
+ */
+static struct of_device_id pwm_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm", .data = &pwm_id_table[0]},
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pwm_of_match);
+
+static const struct platform_device_id *pxa_pwm_get_id_dt(struct device *dev)
+{
+	const struct of_device_id *pwm_pxa_devid =
+		of_match_device(pwm_of_match, dev);
+	if (pwm_pxa_devid)
+		return (const struct platform_device_id *)pwm_pxa_devid->data;
+	else
+		return NULL;
+}
+#else  /* !CONFIG_OF */
+static const struct platform_device_id *pxa_pwm_get_id_dt(struct device *dev)
+{
+	dev_info(dev, "missing platform data\n");
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	const struct platform_device_id *id = platform_get_device_id(pdev);
@@ -131,6 +180,11 @@ static int pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct resource *r;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	if (id == NULL)		/* using device tree */
+		id = pxa_pwm_get_id_dt(&pdev->dev);
+	if (id == NULL)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (pwm == NULL) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate memory\n");
@@ -145,6 +199,8 @@ static int pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pwm->chip.ops = &pxa_pwm_ops;
 	pwm->chip.base = -1;
 	pwm->chip.npwm = (id->driver_data & HAS_SECONDARY_PWM) ? 2 : 1;
+	pwm->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
+	pwm->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
 
 	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 	pwm->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
@@ -176,6 +232,7 @@ static struct platform_driver pwm_driver = {
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "pxa25x-pwm",
 		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
+		.of_match_table	= of_match_ptr(pwm_of_match),
 	},
 	.probe		= pwm_probe,
 	.remove		= pwm_remove,
-- 
1.8.1.5

[RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Mike Dunn]

This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
for inverted polarity is also added.

Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).

Signed-off-by: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>
---
Changle log:
Resent with expanded Cc list
v2:
- of_match_table contains only the "pxa250-pwm" compatible string; require one
  device instance per pwm
- add Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
- add support for polarity flag in DT and implement set_polarity() method
  (the treo 680 inverts the signal between pwm out and backlight)
- return -EINVAL instead of -ENODEV if platform data or DT node not found
- output dev_info string if platform data missing
- expanded CC list of patch

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt | 33 +++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi                     | 24 ++++++++++
 drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c                             | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7b09bfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+Marvell pwm controller
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible:
+  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
+  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
+  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
+  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
+- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
+   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
+   cell 2: the period in nanoseconds,
+   cell 3: flags; set bit 0 to specify inverse polarity.  The pwm controller
+   does not implement reverse polarity, but some boards may pass the pwm output
+   through an external inverter, which can cause problems if a client device
+   assumes that an increase in the duty cycle results in an increase in output
+   power.  The pwm-backlight is an example of such a client.
+
+Example pwm device node:
+
+pwm0: pwm@40b00000 {
+	compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+	reg = <0x40b00000 0x10>;
+	#pwm-cells = <3>;
+};
+
+Example pwm client node:
+
+backlight {
+      	compatible = "pwm-backlight";
+     	pwms = <&pwm0 0 5000000 1>;  /* pwm output is inverted */
+	...
+}
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi
index d7c5d72..a12fe8e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi
@@ -10,5 +10,29 @@
 			marvell,intc-priority;
 			marvell,intc-nr-irqs = <34>;
 		};
+
+		pwm0: pwm@40b00000 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40b00000 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
+
+		pwm1: pwm@40b00010 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40b00010 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
+
+		pwm2: pwm@40c00000 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40c00000 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
+
+		pwm3: pwm@40c00010 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40c00010 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
 	};
 };
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
index a4d2164..33e6a7d 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 
 #include <asm/div64.h>
 
@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ struct pxa_pwm_chip {
 
 	struct clk	*clk;
 	void __iomem	*mmio_base;
+	enum pwm_polarity polarity;
 };
 
 static inline struct pxa_pwm_chip *to_pxa_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
@@ -88,6 +90,15 @@ static int pxa_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	else
 		dc = (pv + 1) * duty_ns / period_ns;
 
+	if (pc->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) {
+		if (dc & PWMDCR_FD)
+			dc = 0;	        /* continuously low */
+		else if (dc == 0)
+			dc = PWMDCR_FD; /* continuously high */
+		else
+			dc = 1023 - dc; /* complement duty cycle */
+	}
+
 	/* NOTE: the clock to PWM has to be enabled first
 	 * before writing to the registers
 	 */
@@ -117,13 +128,51 @@ static void pxa_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
 }
 
+static int pxa_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				enum pwm_polarity polarity)
+{
+	struct pxa_pwm_chip *pc = to_pxa_pwm_chip(chip);
+	pc->polarity = polarity;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct pwm_ops pxa_pwm_ops = {
 	.config = pxa_pwm_config,
 	.enable = pxa_pwm_enable,
 	.disable = pxa_pwm_disable,
+	.set_polarity = pxa_pwm_set_polarity,
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+/*
+ * Device tree users should create one device instance for each pwm channel.
+ * Hence we dispense with the HAS_SECONDARY_PWM and "tell" the original driver
+ * code that this is a single channel pxa25x-pwm.
+ */
+static struct of_device_id pwm_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm", .data = &pwm_id_table[0]},
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pwm_of_match);
+
+static const struct platform_device_id *pxa_pwm_get_id_dt(struct device *dev)
+{
+	const struct of_device_id *pwm_pxa_devid =
+		of_match_device(pwm_of_match, dev);
+	if (pwm_pxa_devid)
+		return (const struct platform_device_id *)pwm_pxa_devid->data;
+	else
+		return NULL;
+}
+#else  /* !CONFIG_OF */
+static const struct platform_device_id *pxa_pwm_get_id_dt(struct device *dev)
+{
+	dev_info(dev, "missing platform data\n");
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	const struct platform_device_id *id = platform_get_device_id(pdev);
@@ -131,6 +180,11 @@ static int pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct resource *r;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	if (id == NULL)		/* using device tree */
+		id = pxa_pwm_get_id_dt(&pdev->dev);
+	if (id == NULL)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (pwm == NULL) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate memory\n");
@@ -145,6 +199,8 @@ static int pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pwm->chip.ops = &pxa_pwm_ops;
 	pwm->chip.base = -1;
 	pwm->chip.npwm = (id->driver_data & HAS_SECONDARY_PWM) ? 2 : 1;
+	pwm->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
+	pwm->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
 
 	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 	pwm->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
@@ -176,6 +232,7 @@ static struct platform_driver pwm_driver = {
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "pxa25x-pwm",
 		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
+		.of_match_table	= of_match_ptr(pwm_of_match),
 	},
 	.probe		= pwm_probe,
 	.remove		= pwm_remove,
-- 
1.8.1.5

[RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Mike Dunn]

This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
for inverted polarity is also added.

Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).

Signed-off-by: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>
---
Changle log:
Resent with expanded Cc list
v2:
- of_match_table contains only the "pxa250-pwm" compatible string; require one
  device instance per pwm
- add Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
- add support for polarity flag in DT and implement set_polarity() method
  (the treo 680 inverts the signal between pwm out and backlight)
- return -EINVAL instead of -ENODEV if platform data or DT node not found
- output dev_info string if platform data missing
- expanded CC list of patch

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt | 33 +++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi                     | 24 ++++++++++
 drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c                             | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7b09bfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+Marvell pwm controller
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible:
+  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
+  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
+  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
+  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
+- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
+   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
+   cell 2: the period in nanoseconds,
+   cell 3: flags; set bit 0 to specify inverse polarity.  The pwm controller
+   does not implement reverse polarity, but some boards may pass the pwm output
+   through an external inverter, which can cause problems if a client device
+   assumes that an increase in the duty cycle results in an increase in output
+   power.  The pwm-backlight is an example of such a client.
+
+Example pwm device node:
+
+pwm0: pwm at 40b00000 {
+	compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+	reg = <0x40b00000 0x10>;
+	#pwm-cells = <3>;
+};
+
+Example pwm client node:
+
+backlight {
+      	compatible = "pwm-backlight";
+     	pwms = <&pwm0 0 5000000 1>;  /* pwm output is inverted */
+	...
+}
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi
index d7c5d72..a12fe8e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi
@@ -10,5 +10,29 @@
 			marvell,intc-priority;
 			marvell,intc-nr-irqs = <34>;
 		};
+
+		pwm0: pwm at 40b00000 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40b00000 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
+
+		pwm1: pwm at 40b00010 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40b00010 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
+
+		pwm2: pwm at 40c00000 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40c00000 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
+
+		pwm3: pwm at 40c00010 {
+			compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
+			reg = <0x40c00010 0x10>;
+			#pwm-cells = <3>;
+		};
 	};
 };
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
index a4d2164..33e6a7d 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 
 #include <asm/div64.h>
 
@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ struct pxa_pwm_chip {
 
 	struct clk	*clk;
 	void __iomem	*mmio_base;
+	enum pwm_polarity polarity;
 };
 
 static inline struct pxa_pwm_chip *to_pxa_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
@@ -88,6 +90,15 @@ static int pxa_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	else
 		dc = (pv + 1) * duty_ns / period_ns;
 
+	if (pc->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) {
+		if (dc & PWMDCR_FD)
+			dc = 0;	        /* continuously low */
+		else if (dc == 0)
+			dc = PWMDCR_FD; /* continuously high */
+		else
+			dc = 1023 - dc; /* complement duty cycle */
+	}
+
 	/* NOTE: the clock to PWM has to be enabled first
 	 * before writing to the registers
 	 */
@@ -117,13 +128,51 @@ static void pxa_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
 }
 
+static int pxa_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				enum pwm_polarity polarity)
+{
+	struct pxa_pwm_chip *pc = to_pxa_pwm_chip(chip);
+	pc->polarity = polarity;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct pwm_ops pxa_pwm_ops = {
 	.config = pxa_pwm_config,
 	.enable = pxa_pwm_enable,
 	.disable = pxa_pwm_disable,
+	.set_polarity = pxa_pwm_set_polarity,
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+/*
+ * Device tree users should create one device instance for each pwm channel.
+ * Hence we dispense with the HAS_SECONDARY_PWM and "tell" the original driver
+ * code that this is a single channel pxa25x-pwm.
+ */
+static struct of_device_id pwm_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm", .data = &pwm_id_table[0]},
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pwm_of_match);
+
+static const struct platform_device_id *pxa_pwm_get_id_dt(struct device *dev)
+{
+	const struct of_device_id *pwm_pxa_devid =
+		of_match_device(pwm_of_match, dev);
+	if (pwm_pxa_devid)
+		return (const struct platform_device_id *)pwm_pxa_devid->data;
+	else
+		return NULL;
+}
+#else  /* !CONFIG_OF */
+static const struct platform_device_id *pxa_pwm_get_id_dt(struct device *dev)
+{
+	dev_info(dev, "missing platform data\n");
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	const struct platform_device_id *id = platform_get_device_id(pdev);
@@ -131,6 +180,11 @@ static int pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct resource *r;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	if (id == NULL)		/* using device tree */
+		id = pxa_pwm_get_id_dt(&pdev->dev);
+	if (id == NULL)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (pwm == NULL) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate memory\n");
@@ -145,6 +199,8 @@ static int pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pwm->chip.ops = &pxa_pwm_ops;
 	pwm->chip.base = -1;
 	pwm->chip.npwm = (id->driver_data & HAS_SECONDARY_PWM) ? 2 : 1;
+	pwm->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
+	pwm->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
 
 	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 	pwm->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
@@ -176,6 +232,7 @@ static struct platform_driver pwm_driver = {
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "pxa25x-pwm",
 		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
+		.of_match_table	= of_match_ptr(pwm_of_match),
 	},
 	.probe		= pwm_probe,
 	.remove		= pwm_remove,
-- 
1.8.1.5

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Stephen Warren]

On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
> This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
> table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
> existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
> for inverted polarity is also added.
> 
> Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt

> +Marvell pwm controller

s/pwm/PWM/ throughout.

> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible:
> +  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";

I think you want a separate compatible value for each HW, to allow for
any HW-specific quirks to be enabled later if required. So, you could
document "marvell,pxa250-pwm" as the basic compatible value that a
driver can bind to, yet also document the other values as being required
for the relevant HW?

> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,

That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
PWM channel.

> +   cell 2: the period in nanoseconds,
> +   cell 3: flags; set bit 0 to specify inverse polarity.  The pwm controller
> +   does not implement reverse polarity, but some boards may pass the pwm output
> +   through an external inverter, which can cause problems if a client device
> +   assumes that an increase in the duty cycle results in an increase in output
> +   power.  The pwm-backlight is an example of such a client.

Hmm. I wonder what are the semantics of the PWM subsystem's "inverse
polarity" flag. What about a HW block that can do inverse polarity, but
also has an inverter on the board? If we subvert this flag (in this
case) to mean "there's an inverter on the board", then how can a
different PWM binding use it to mean "configure the PWM HW block to
invert the signal"?

> +Example pwm device node:
> +
> +pwm0: pwm@40b00000 {
> +	compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
> +	reg = <0x40b00000 0x10>;
> +	#pwm-cells = <3>;
> +};
> +
> +Example pwm client node:
> +
> +backlight {
> +      	compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> +     	pwms = <&pwm0 0 5000000 1>;  /* pwm output is inverted */
> +	...
> +}

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Stephen Warren]

On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
> This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
> table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
> existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
> for inverted polarity is also added.
> 
> Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt

> +Marvell pwm controller

s/pwm/PWM/ throughout.

> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible:
> +  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";

I think you want a separate compatible value for each HW, to allow for
any HW-specific quirks to be enabled later if required. So, you could
document "marvell,pxa250-pwm" as the basic compatible value that a
driver can bind to, yet also document the other values as being required
for the relevant HW?

> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,

That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
PWM channel.

> +   cell 2: the period in nanoseconds,
> +   cell 3: flags; set bit 0 to specify inverse polarity.  The pwm controller
> +   does not implement reverse polarity, but some boards may pass the pwm output
> +   through an external inverter, which can cause problems if a client device
> +   assumes that an increase in the duty cycle results in an increase in output
> +   power.  The pwm-backlight is an example of such a client.

Hmm. I wonder what are the semantics of the PWM subsystem's "inverse
polarity" flag. What about a HW block that can do inverse polarity, but
also has an inverter on the board? If we subvert this flag (in this
case) to mean "there's an inverter on the board", then how can a
different PWM binding use it to mean "configure the PWM HW block to
invert the signal"?

> +Example pwm device node:
> +
> +pwm0: pwm@40b00000 {
> +	compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
> +	reg = <0x40b00000 0x10>;
> +	#pwm-cells = <3>;
> +};
> +
> +Example pwm client node:
> +
> +backlight {
> +      	compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> +     	pwms = <&pwm0 0 5000000 1>;  /* pwm output is inverted */
> +	...
> +}

[RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Stephen Warren]

On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
> This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
> table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
> existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
> for inverted polarity is also added.
> 
> Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt

> +Marvell pwm controller

s/pwm/PWM/ throughout.

> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible:
> +  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";

I think you want a separate compatible value for each HW, to allow for
any HW-specific quirks to be enabled later if required. So, you could
document "marvell,pxa250-pwm" as the basic compatible value that a
driver can bind to, yet also document the other values as being required
for the relevant HW?

> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,

That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
PWM channel.

> +   cell 2: the period in nanoseconds,
> +   cell 3: flags; set bit 0 to specify inverse polarity.  The pwm controller
> +   does not implement reverse polarity, but some boards may pass the pwm output
> +   through an external inverter, which can cause problems if a client device
> +   assumes that an increase in the duty cycle results in an increase in output
> +   power.  The pwm-backlight is an example of such a client.

Hmm. I wonder what are the semantics of the PWM subsystem's "inverse
polarity" flag. What about a HW block that can do inverse polarity, but
also has an inverter on the board? If we subvert this flag (in this
case) to mean "there's an inverter on the board", then how can a
different PWM binding use it to mean "configure the PWM HW block to
invert the signal"?

> +Example pwm device node:
> +
> +pwm0: pwm at 40b00000 {
> +	compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
> +	reg = <0x40b00000 0x10>;
> +	#pwm-cells = <3>;
> +};
> +
> +Example pwm client node:
> +
> +backlight {
> +      	compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> +     	pwms = <&pwm0 0 5000000 1>;  /* pwm output is inverted */
> +	...
> +}

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Mike Dunn]

On 09/09/2013 02:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
>> This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
>> table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
>> existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
>> for inverted polarity is also added.
>>
>> Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).
> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
> 
>> +Marvell pwm controller
> 
> s/pwm/PWM/ throughout.
> 
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible:
>> +  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
> 
> I think you want a separate compatible value for each HW, to allow for
> any HW-specific quirks to be enabled later if required. So, you could
> document "marvell,pxa250-pwm" as the basic compatible value that a
> driver can bind to, yet also document the other values as being required
> for the relevant HW?


IOW...
- compatible: should be one of:
  - "marvell,pxa250-pwm"
  - "marvell,pxa270-pwm"
  - "marvell,pxa168-pwm"
  - "marvell,pxa910-pwm"

Even though the driver makes no functional distinction currently?


> 
>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
>> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
>> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
>> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
>> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
>> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
> 
> That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
> PWM channel.


Yes, but I was afraid to deviate from the format used by the other PWM
controllers.  (But in that case, it should at least be documented as "must be
zero". Thanks.)  If going my owm way is acceptable, I'll define my own
of_xlate() parser and remove this cell.


> 
>> +   cell 2: the period in nanoseconds,
>> +   cell 3: flags; set bit 0 to specify inverse polarity.  The pwm controller
>> +   does not implement reverse polarity, but some boards may pass the pwm output
>> +   through an external inverter, which can cause problems if a client device
>> +   assumes that an increase in the duty cycle results in an increase in output
>> +   power.  The pwm-backlight is an example of such a client.
> 
> Hmm. I wonder what are the semantics of the PWM subsystem's "inverse
> polarity" flag. What about a HW block that can do inverse polarity, but
> also has an inverter on the board? If we subvert this flag (in this
> case) to mean "there's an inverter on the board", then how can a
> different PWM binding use it to mean "configure the PWM HW block to
> invert the signal"?


Yeah, Thierry shot this down for the same good reasons.  The correct approach
for my issue is to fix the pwm-backlight driver.


I really appreciate the review Stephen.  Thanks again!
Mike

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Mike Dunn]

On 09/09/2013 02:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
>> This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
>> table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
>> existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
>> for inverted polarity is also added.
>>
>> Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).
> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
> 
>> +Marvell pwm controller
> 
> s/pwm/PWM/ throughout.
> 
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible:
>> +  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
> 
> I think you want a separate compatible value for each HW, to allow for
> any HW-specific quirks to be enabled later if required. So, you could
> document "marvell,pxa250-pwm" as the basic compatible value that a
> driver can bind to, yet also document the other values as being required
> for the relevant HW?


IOW...
- compatible: should be one of:
  - "marvell,pxa250-pwm"
  - "marvell,pxa270-pwm"
  - "marvell,pxa168-pwm"
  - "marvell,pxa910-pwm"

Even though the driver makes no functional distinction currently?


> 
>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
>> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
>> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
>> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
>> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
>> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
> 
> That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
> PWM channel.


Yes, but I was afraid to deviate from the format used by the other PWM
controllers.  (But in that case, it should at least be documented as "must be
zero". Thanks.)  If going my owm way is acceptable, I'll define my own
of_xlate() parser and remove this cell.


> 
>> +   cell 2: the period in nanoseconds,
>> +   cell 3: flags; set bit 0 to specify inverse polarity.  The pwm controller
>> +   does not implement reverse polarity, but some boards may pass the pwm output
>> +   through an external inverter, which can cause problems if a client device
>> +   assumes that an increase in the duty cycle results in an increase in output
>> +   power.  The pwm-backlight is an example of such a client.
> 
> Hmm. I wonder what are the semantics of the PWM subsystem's "inverse
> polarity" flag. What about a HW block that can do inverse polarity, but
> also has an inverter on the board? If we subvert this flag (in this
> case) to mean "there's an inverter on the board", then how can a
> different PWM binding use it to mean "configure the PWM HW block to
> invert the signal"?


Yeah, Thierry shot this down for the same good reasons.  The correct approach
for my issue is to fix the pwm-backlight driver.


I really appreciate the review Stephen.  Thanks again!
Mike

[RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Mike Dunn]

On 09/09/2013 02:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
>> This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
>> table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
>> existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
>> for inverted polarity is also added.
>>
>> Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).
> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
> 
>> +Marvell pwm controller
> 
> s/pwm/PWM/ throughout.
> 
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible:
>> +  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
> 
> I think you want a separate compatible value for each HW, to allow for
> any HW-specific quirks to be enabled later if required. So, you could
> document "marvell,pxa250-pwm" as the basic compatible value that a
> driver can bind to, yet also document the other values as being required
> for the relevant HW?


IOW...
- compatible: should be one of:
  - "marvell,pxa250-pwm"
  - "marvell,pxa270-pwm"
  - "marvell,pxa168-pwm"
  - "marvell,pxa910-pwm"

Even though the driver makes no functional distinction currently?


> 
>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
>> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
>> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
>> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
>> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
>> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
> 
> That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
> PWM channel.


Yes, but I was afraid to deviate from the format used by the other PWM
controllers.  (But in that case, it should at least be documented as "must be
zero". Thanks.)  If going my owm way is acceptable, I'll define my own
of_xlate() parser and remove this cell.


> 
>> +   cell 2: the period in nanoseconds,
>> +   cell 3: flags; set bit 0 to specify inverse polarity.  The pwm controller
>> +   does not implement reverse polarity, but some boards may pass the pwm output
>> +   through an external inverter, which can cause problems if a client device
>> +   assumes that an increase in the duty cycle results in an increase in output
>> +   power.  The pwm-backlight is an example of such a client.
> 
> Hmm. I wonder what are the semantics of the PWM subsystem's "inverse
> polarity" flag. What about a HW block that can do inverse polarity, but
> also has an inverter on the board? If we subvert this flag (in this
> case) to mean "there's an inverter on the board", then how can a
> different PWM binding use it to mean "configure the PWM HW block to
> invert the signal"?


Yeah, Thierry shot this down for the same good reasons.  The correct approach
for my issue is to fix the pwm-backlight driver.


I really appreciate the review Stephen.  Thanks again!
Mike

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Stephen Warren]

On 09/10/2013 09:54 AM, Mike Dunn wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 02:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
>>> This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
>>> table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
>>> existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
>>> for inverted polarity is also added.
>>>
>>> Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
>>
>>> +Marvell pwm controller
>>
>> s/pwm/PWM/ throughout.
>>
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible:
>>> +  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
>>
>> I think you want a separate compatible value for each HW, to allow for
>> any HW-specific quirks to be enabled later if required. So, you could
>> document "marvell,pxa250-pwm" as the basic compatible value that a
>> driver can bind to, yet also document the other values as being required
>> for the relevant HW?
> 
> IOW...
> - compatible: should be one of:
>   - "marvell,pxa250-pwm"
>   - "marvell,pxa270-pwm"
>   - "marvell,pxa168-pwm"
>   - "marvell,pxa910-pwm"
> 
> Even though the driver makes no functional distinction currently?

Yes (although it's fine to make the driver only look for the first of
those, since you say they're all compatible, and currently the driver
doesn't care about exactly which HW is in use).

>>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
>>> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
>>> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
>>> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
>>> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
>>> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
>>
>> That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
>> PWM channel.
> 
> Yes, but I was afraid to deviate from the format used by the other PWM
> controllers.  (But in that case, it should at least be documented as "must be
> zero". Thanks.)  If going my owm way is acceptable, I'll define my own
> of_xlate() parser and remove this cell.

I don't think there's any issue with deviating; that's exactly what
#pwm-cells is for.

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Stephen Warren]

On 09/10/2013 09:54 AM, Mike Dunn wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 02:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
>>> This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
>>> table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
>>> existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
>>> for inverted polarity is also added.
>>>
>>> Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
>>
>>> +Marvell pwm controller
>>
>> s/pwm/PWM/ throughout.
>>
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible:
>>> +  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
>>
>> I think you want a separate compatible value for each HW, to allow for
>> any HW-specific quirks to be enabled later if required. So, you could
>> document "marvell,pxa250-pwm" as the basic compatible value that a
>> driver can bind to, yet also document the other values as being required
>> for the relevant HW?
> 
> IOW...
> - compatible: should be one of:
>   - "marvell,pxa250-pwm"
>   - "marvell,pxa270-pwm"
>   - "marvell,pxa168-pwm"
>   - "marvell,pxa910-pwm"
> 
> Even though the driver makes no functional distinction currently?

Yes (although it's fine to make the driver only look for the first of
those, since you say they're all compatible, and currently the driver
doesn't care about exactly which HW is in use).

>>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
>>> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
>>> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
>>> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
>>> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
>>> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
>>
>> That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
>> PWM channel.
> 
> Yes, but I was afraid to deviate from the format used by the other PWM
> controllers.  (But in that case, it should at least be documented as "must be
> zero". Thanks.)  If going my owm way is acceptable, I'll define my own
> of_xlate() parser and remove this cell.

I don't think there's any issue with deviating; that's exactly what
#pwm-cells is for.

[RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Stephen Warren]

On 09/10/2013 09:54 AM, Mike Dunn wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 02:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
>>> This patch adds device tree support to the pxa's pwm driver.  Only an OF match
>>> table is added; nothing needs to be extracted from the device tree node.  The
>>> existing platform_device id table is reused for the match table data.  Support
>>> for inverted polarity is also added.
>>>
>>> Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
>>
>>> +Marvell pwm controller
>>
>> s/pwm/PWM/ throughout.
>>
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible:
>>> +  for pxa25x, pxa27x, pxa168, pxa910: must be compatible = "marvell,pxa250-pwm";
>>
>> I think you want a separate compatible value for each HW, to allow for
>> any HW-specific quirks to be enabled later if required. So, you could
>> document "marvell,pxa250-pwm" as the basic compatible value that a
>> driver can bind to, yet also document the other values as being required
>> for the relevant HW?
> 
> IOW...
> - compatible: should be one of:
>   - "marvell,pxa250-pwm"
>   - "marvell,pxa270-pwm"
>   - "marvell,pxa168-pwm"
>   - "marvell,pxa910-pwm"
> 
> Even though the driver makes no functional distinction currently?

Yes (although it's fine to make the driver only look for the first of
those, since you say they're all compatible, and currently the driver
doesn't care about exactly which HW is in use).

>>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
>>> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
>>> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
>>> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
>>> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
>>> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
>>
>> That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
>> PWM channel.
> 
> Yes, but I was afraid to deviate from the format used by the other PWM
> controllers.  (But in that case, it should at least be documented as "must be
> zero". Thanks.)  If going my owm way is acceptable, I'll define my own
> of_xlate() parser and remove this cell.

I don't think there's any issue with deviating; that's exactly what
#pwm-cells is for.

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Thierry Reding]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1211 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:46:49AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 09:54 AM, Mike Dunn wrote:
> > On 09/09/2013 02:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
[...]
> >>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
> >>> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
> >>> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
> >>> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
> >>> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
> >>> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
> >>
> >> That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
> >> PWM channel.
> > 
> > Yes, but I was afraid to deviate from the format used by the other PWM
> > controllers.  (But in that case, it should at least be documented as "must be
> > zero". Thanks.)  If going my owm way is acceptable, I'll define my own
> > of_xlate() parser and remove this cell.
> 
> I don't think there's any issue with deviating; that's exactly what
> #pwm-cells is for.

Agreed, I have no objections to using a custom .of_xlate().

Thierry

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Thierry Reding]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1211 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:46:49AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 09:54 AM, Mike Dunn wrote:
> > On 09/09/2013 02:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
[...]
> >>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
> >>> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
> >>> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
> >>> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
> >>> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
> >>> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
> >>
> >> That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
> >> PWM channel.
> > 
> > Yes, but I was afraid to deviate from the format used by the other PWM
> > controllers.  (But in that case, it should at least be documented as "must be
> > zero". Thanks.)  If going my owm way is acceptable, I'll define my own
> > of_xlate() parser and remove this cell.
> 
> I don't think there's any issue with deviating; that's exactly what
> #pwm-cells is for.

Agreed, I have no objections to using a custom .of_xlate().

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[RESEND PATCH v2] pwm: pxa: add device tree support to pwm driver

[Thierry Reding]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:46:49AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 09:54 AM, Mike Dunn wrote:
> > On 09/09/2013 02:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 09/09/2013 12:30 PM, Mike Dunn wrote:
[...]
> >>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers used by the pwm channel
> >>> +  NB: One device instance must be created for each pwm that is used, so the
> >>> +  length covers only the register window for one pwm output, not that of the
> >>> +  entire pwm controller.  Currently length is 0x10 for all supported devices.
> >>> +- #pwm-cells: should be 3.
> >>> +   cell 1: the per-chip index of the PWM to use,
> >>
> >> That cell shouldn't be needed if you really want to have one DT node per
> >> PWM channel.
> > 
> > Yes, but I was afraid to deviate from the format used by the other PWM
> > controllers.  (But in that case, it should at least be documented as "must be
> > zero". Thanks.)  If going my owm way is acceptable, I'll define my own
> > of_xlate() parser and remove this cell.
> 
> I don't think there's any issue with deviating; that's exactly what
> #pwm-cells is for.

Agreed, I have no objections to using a custom .of_xlate().

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130910/f91e6adc/attachment.sig>