[GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: soc changes for v3.13

[GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: soc changes for v3.13

[Jason Cooper]

Guys,

These are the SoC changes that didn't make it during the last merge
window.  As with mvebu/drivers, these have been in -next since 3.12-rc1
without issue.

thx,

Jason.


The following changes since commit 272b98c6455f00884f0350f775c5342358ebb73f:

  Linux 3.12-rc1 (2013-09-16 16:17:51 -0400)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.infradead.org/linux-mvebu.git tags/soc-3.13

for you to fetch changes up to ffe195c369656b5e4d3b5c21376483c23589be30:

  ARM: dove: remove legacy pcie and clock init (2013-09-30 15:01:51 +0000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
mvebu soc changes for v3.13

 - dove
    - use DT for mbus windows
    - use DT for pcie and clock init

----------------------------------------------------------------
Sebastian Hesselbarth (2):
      ARM: dove: switch to DT probed mbus address windows
      ARM: dove: remove legacy pcie and clock init

 arch/arm/mach-dove/board-dt.c | 39 +--------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 38 deletions(-)

[GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: soc changes for v3.13

[Olof Johansson]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:42:08AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> These are the SoC changes that didn't make it during the last merge
> window.  As with mvebu/drivers, these have been in -next since 3.12-rc1
> without issue.

I should have looked closer at this before I commented on the PCI branch.

> Sebastian Hesselbarth (2):
>       ARM: dove: switch to DT probed mbus address windows
>       ARM: dove: remove legacy pcie and clock init

It looks to me like this second patch will need to be based on the PCI branch,
or you will have broken PCI if this is applied and not the drivers/pci patches,
right? If so, you need to base this branch on top of the other one, not send
them separately -- otherwise a git bisect that lands between these two will
result in a non-booting kernel.

This also explains why you need the PCI patches through arm-soc, so I answered
my own question. :-)


-Olof

[GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: soc changes for v3.13

[Jason Cooper]

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:06:40AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:42:08AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > Guys,
> > 
> > These are the SoC changes that didn't make it during the last merge
> > window.  As with mvebu/drivers, these have been in -next since 3.12-rc1
> > without issue.
> 
> I should have looked closer at this before I commented on the PCI branch.

No problem. :)

> > Sebastian Hesselbarth (2):
> >       ARM: dove: switch to DT probed mbus address windows
> >       ARM: dove: remove legacy pcie and clock init
> 
> It looks to me like this second patch will need to be based on the PCI branch,
> or you will have broken PCI if this is applied and not the drivers/pci patches,
> right? If so, you need to base this branch on top of the other one, not send
> them separately -- otherwise a git bisect that lands between these two will
> result in a non-booting kernel.

Hmm, I'd like to avoid the branch dependency if possible.  I'll just
move the patch over from mvebu/soc to mvebu/drivers.  There might be a
trivial merge conflict later on, but I seriously doubt it.

v2 on it's way...

thx,

Jason.

[GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: soc changes for v3.13

[Jason Cooper]

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:06:40AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:42:08AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > Guys,
> > 
> > These are the SoC changes that didn't make it during the last merge
> > window.  As with mvebu/drivers, these have been in -next since 3.12-rc1
> > without issue.
> 
> I should have looked closer at this before I commented on the PCI branch.
> 
> > Sebastian Hesselbarth (2):
> >       ARM: dove: switch to DT probed mbus address windows
> >       ARM: dove: remove legacy pcie and clock init
> 
> It looks to me like this second patch will need to be based on the PCI branch,
> or you will have broken PCI if this is applied and not the drivers/pci patches,
> right? If so, you need to base this branch on top of the other one, not send
> them separately -- otherwise a git bisect that lands between these two will
> result in a non-booting kernel.

I've moved both patches over to mvebu/drivers.  This leaves one patch in
mvebu/soc.  I'll hold off on the pull request for it until I have some
more (looks like there's some stuff pending).

thx,

Jason.

[GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: soc changes for v3.13

[Kevin Hilman]

Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:06:40AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:42:08AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> > Guys,
>> > 
>> > These are the SoC changes that didn't make it during the last merge
>> > window.  As with mvebu/drivers, these have been in -next since 3.12-rc1
>> > without issue.
>> 
>> I should have looked closer at this before I commented on the PCI branch.
>> 
>> > Sebastian Hesselbarth (2):
>> >       ARM: dove: switch to DT probed mbus address windows
>> >       ARM: dove: remove legacy pcie and clock init
>> 
>> It looks to me like this second patch will need to be based on the PCI branch,
>> or you will have broken PCI if this is applied and not the drivers/pci patches,
>> right? If so, you need to base this branch on top of the other one, not send
>> them separately -- otherwise a git bisect that lands between these two will
>> result in a non-booting kernel.
>
> I've moved both patches over to mvebu/drivers.  This leaves one patch in
> mvebu/soc.  I'll hold off on the pull request for it until I have some
> more (looks like there's some stuff pending).

OK, ignoring the soc branch for now.

Kevin