From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, jmario@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@infradead.org,
mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip()
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:09:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131017150944.GQ10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131017150358.GN227855@redhat.com>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:03:58AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:51:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:49:13AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > For some reason this patch is page faulting at an invalid address inside
> > > __intel_pmu_pebs_event().
> >
> > Ah yes, I lost a refresh, but read on; I've send a gazillion new emails
> > since ;-)
>
> Yes, I have noticed, but I got worried when you labeled some of them with
> 'untested'. :-) Thought I would stick to something a little more close to
> working.
>
> >
> > I think it was something like: s/this_cpu_ptr/this_cpu_read/ to make it
> > work again.
>
> Thanks. I will try some of the other pieces today (unlike yesterday).
The patches you find in:
http://programming.kicks-ass.net/sekrit/patches.tar.bz2
are actually running on my machine now.
One of the things I was considering was further shrinking the max basic
block size from 4k to maybe 1k or 512 bytes. Not sure what a sane basic
block length limit would be.
I did try 1k earlier today and I seemed to still get near 100% rewind
success rates.
Stephane, Andi, any clues?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-17 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-14 20:35 x86, perf: throttling issues with long nmi latencies Don Zickus
2013-10-14 21:28 ` Andi Kleen
2013-10-15 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 13:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 15:41 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-16 10:57 ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 12:46 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-16 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 13:54 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-29 14:07 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Fix NMI measurements tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 20:52 ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Andi Kleen
2013-10-16 21:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 23:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 16:00 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 16:04 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-17 21:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 21:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 22:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-22 21:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-23 7:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-23 20:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-24 10:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-24 13:47 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-24 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-25 16:33 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-25 17:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-26 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-28 13:19 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-29 14:08 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Further optimize copy_from_user_nmi() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-23 7:44 ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Ingo Molnar
2013-10-17 14:49 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 15:03 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-10-17 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 16:50 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 16:22 ` x86, perf: throttling issues with long nmi latencies Don Zickus
2013-10-15 14:36 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-15 14:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131017150944.GQ10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jmario@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.