From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: perf/tracepoint: another fuzzer generated lockup
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 16:59:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131109155938.GC4971@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131109152659.GD26079@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 04:27:01PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> In fact, raising an irq work from an irq work should simply be prohibited. That's not a sane
> behaviour.
Well, it is because as you raised on IRC we could be holding locks and
trying to avoid deadlocks. This is the very reason irq_work gets used in
printk.
And its not a recursive run()->work()->queue() either, because as you said this
tracepoint is in arch code _after_ work_run completes.
All in all an exceedingly vexing issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-09 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-08 19:45 perf/tracepoint: another fuzzer generated lockup Vince Weaver
2013-11-08 20:06 ` Vince Weaver
2013-11-08 20:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-08 20:23 ` Vince Weaver
2013-11-08 20:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-08 21:15 ` Vince Weaver
2013-11-08 22:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-08 22:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-09 1:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-09 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-09 14:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-11 12:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-11 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-11 21:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-09 14:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-09 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-09 15:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-09 15:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-11-09 16:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-09 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-09 15:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-09 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-14 15:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-14 15:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-14 15:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-15 1:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-15 12:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-15 14:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-15 14:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-17 7:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-17 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-14 16:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-14 17:20 ` Vince Weaver
2013-11-14 17:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-14 17:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-14 19:18 ` Vince Weaver
2013-11-19 19:18 ` [tip:perf/urgent] ftrace, perf: Avoid infinite event generation loop tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-09 0:25 ` perf/tracepoint: another fuzzer generated lockup Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131109155938.GC4971@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.