* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13
@ 2013-10-09 17:13 Will Deacon
2013-10-30 15:24 ` Paul Walmsley
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2013-10-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Russell,
Please pull the following patches for 3.13. They add support for the pldw
instruction (prefetch with intent to modify) in ARMv7 SMP cores, which is
then used to gain a measurable performance boost for particular atomic
sequences.
Cheers,
Will
--->8
The following changes since commit 15c03dd4859ab16f9212238f29dd315654aa94f6:
Linux 3.12-rc3 (2013-09-29 15:02:38 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git for-rmk/prefetch
for you to fetch changes up to d779c07dd72098a7416d907494f958213b7726f3:
ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex (2013-09-30 16:42:56 +0100)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Will Deacon (6):
ARM: prefetch: remove redundant "cc" clobber
ARM: smp_on_up: move inline asm ALT_SMP patching macro out of spinlock.h
ARM: prefetch: add support for prefetchw using pldw on SMP ARMv7+ CPUs
ARM: locks: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex
ARM: atomics: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex
ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex
arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h | 7 +++++++
arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 2 +-
arch/arm/include/asm/unified.h | 4 ++++
arch/arm/lib/bitops.h | 5 +++++
6 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-10-09 17:13 [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 Will Deacon @ 2013-10-30 15:24 ` Paul Walmsley 2013-10-30 15:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2013-11-11 9:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2013-11-24 9:54 ` Dirk Behme 2 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Paul Walmsley @ 2013-10-30 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Will et al., On 10/09/2013 10:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Russell, > > Please pull the following patches for 3.13. They add support for the pldw > instruction (prefetch with intent to modify) in ARMv7 SMP cores, which is > then used to gain a measurable performance boost for particular atomic > sequences. Looks like the pldw changes require binutils >= 2.21. Might be worth considering a patch to update Documentation/Changes? - Paul > > Cheers, > > Will > > --->8 > > The following changes since commit 15c03dd4859ab16f9212238f29dd315654aa94f6: > > Linux 3.12-rc3 (2013-09-29 15:02:38 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git for-rmk/prefetch > > for you to fetch changes up to d779c07dd72098a7416d907494f958213b7726f3: > > ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex (2013-09-30 16:42:56 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Will Deacon (6): > ARM: prefetch: remove redundant "cc" clobber > ARM: smp_on_up: move inline asm ALT_SMP patching macro out of spinlock.h > ARM: prefetch: add support for prefetchw using pldw on SMP ARMv7+ CPUs > ARM: locks: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > ARM: atomics: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > > arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h | 7 +++++++ > arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- > arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 2 +- > arch/arm/include/asm/unified.h | 4 ++++ > arch/arm/lib/bitops.h | 5 +++++ > 6 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-10-30 15:24 ` Paul Walmsley @ 2013-10-30 15:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2013-10-30 15:32 ` Stephen Warren 2013-10-30 15:53 ` Paul Walmsley 0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2013-10-30 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:24:35AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi Will et al., > > On 10/09/2013 10:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >> Hi Russell, >> >> Please pull the following patches for 3.13. They add support for the pldw >> instruction (prefetch with intent to modify) in ARMv7 SMP cores, which is >> then used to gain a measurable performance boost for particular atomic >> sequences. > > Looks like the pldw changes require binutils >= 2.21. Might be worth > considering a patch to update Documentation/Changes? Not really - because that says "for all architectures the minimum requirement is now 2.21 or later" and that's certainly not the case. It's only ARMv7 which requires this. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-10-30 15:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2013-10-30 15:32 ` Stephen Warren 2013-10-30 15:53 ` Paul Walmsley 1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Stephen Warren @ 2013-10-30 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 10/30/2013 09:25 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:24:35AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: >> Hi Will et al., >> >> On 10/09/2013 10:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> Hi Russell, >>> >>> Please pull the following patches for 3.13. They add support for the pldw >>> instruction (prefetch with intent to modify) in ARMv7 SMP cores, which is >>> then used to gain a measurable performance boost for particular atomic >>> sequences. >> >> Looks like the pldw changes require binutils >= 2.21. Might be worth >> considering a patch to update Documentation/Changes? > > Not really - because that says "for all architectures the minimum > requirement is now 2.21 or later" and that's certainly not the case. By "that", do you mean the text Paul wrote? I don't think he was suggesting that as a patch. > It's only ARMv7 which requires this. Wouldn't it make sense to document this still? Can't we just put a list of minimum requirements into Documentation/Changes based on architecure, e.g.: o binutils 2.21 # ld -v (ARMv7) o binutils 2.12 # ld -v (other) At the very least, the current documentation is wrong, because there are clearly cases where binutils-2.12 isn't sufficient. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-10-30 15:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2013-10-30 15:32 ` Stephen Warren @ 2013-10-30 15:53 ` Paul Walmsley 2013-10-30 16:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Paul Walmsley @ 2013-10-30 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Russell, On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:24:35AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: >> Hi Will et al., >> >> On 10/09/2013 10:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> Hi Russell, >>> >>> Please pull the following patches for 3.13. They add support for the pldw >>> instruction (prefetch with intent to modify) in ARMv7 SMP cores, which is >>> then used to gain a measurable performance boost for particular atomic >>> sequences. >> >> Looks like the pldw changes require binutils >= 2.21. Might be worth >> considering a patch to update Documentation/Changes? > > Not really - because that says "for all architectures the minimum > requirement is now 2.21 or later" and that's certainly not the case. > > It's only ARMv7 which requires this. Would you consider something like the following? - Paul From: Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:51:26 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/Changes: update binutils version requirement for ARMv7 builds ARMv7 builds now make use of the pldw opcode and the ".arch_extension mp" pragma. These aren't supported in binutils prior to 2.21. So, update Documentation/Changes accordingly. Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@nvidia.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> --- Documentation/Changes | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/Changes b/Documentation/Changes index b175808..97fcbdf 100644 --- a/Documentation/Changes +++ b/Documentation/Changes @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ assembling the 16-bit boot code, removing the need for as86 to compile your kernel. This change does, however, mean that you need a recent release of binutils. +ARMv7 builds require binutils 2.21 or later due to the use of the pldw +opcode and ".arch_extension mp". + Perl ---- -- 1.8.1.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-10-30 15:53 ` Paul Walmsley @ 2013-10-30 16:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2013-10-30 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:53:08AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi Russell, > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:24:35AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: >>> Hi Will et al., >>> >>> On 10/09/2013 10:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >>>> Hi Russell, >>>> >>>> Please pull the following patches for 3.13. They add support for the pldw >>>> instruction (prefetch with intent to modify) in ARMv7 SMP cores, which is >>>> then used to gain a measurable performance boost for particular atomic >>>> sequences. >>> >>> Looks like the pldw changes require binutils >= 2.21. Might be worth >>> considering a patch to update Documentation/Changes? >> >> Not really - because that says "for all architectures the minimum >> requirement is now 2.21 or later" and that's certainly not the case. >> >> It's only ARMv7 which requires this. > > Would you consider something like the following? I think it's up to others whether we want to start adding this level of detail to this file. Given that we already have x86 there, I don't see a problem with this. Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-10-09 17:13 [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 Will Deacon 2013-10-30 15:24 ` Paul Walmsley @ 2013-11-11 9:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2013-11-11 10:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2013-11-11 11:25 ` Will Deacon 2013-11-24 9:54 ` Dirk Behme 2 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2013-11-11 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hello Will, On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 06:13:13PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > The following changes since commit 15c03dd4859ab16f9212238f29dd315654aa94f6: > > Linux 3.12-rc3 (2013-09-29 15:02:38 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git for-rmk/prefetch > > for you to fetch changes up to d779c07dd72098a7416d907494f958213b7726f3: > > ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex (2013-09-30 16:42:56 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Will Deacon (6): > ARM: prefetch: remove redundant "cc" clobber > ARM: smp_on_up: move inline asm ALT_SMP patching macro out of spinlock.h > ARM: prefetch: add support for prefetchw using pldw on SMP ARMv7+ CPUs > ARM: locks: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > ARM: atomics: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex Hello Will, it seems the last patch breaks on efm32: arch/arm/lib/changebit.S: Assembler messages: arch/arm/lib/changebit.S:15: Error: architectural extension `mp' is not allowed for the current base architecture Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-11-11 9:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König @ 2013-11-11 10:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2013-11-11 11:25 ` Will Deacon 1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2013-11-11 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:08:10AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > Hello Will, > > it seems the last patch breaks on efm32: > > arch/arm/lib/changebit.S: Assembler messages: > arch/arm/lib/changebit.S:15: Error: architectural extension `mp' is not allowed for the current base architecture EFM32 support is not available on either Will's nor my tree, therefore this is new breakage which we're going to have to fix during the -rc series. My view is that we've tried to do too much this merge window: we've had rather a large number of conflicts of all kinds not only between patch series (such as the BE series and others) as well as a large number of build problems caused by changes via my tree interfering with changes from the arm-soc tree. In other words, I think that both arm-soc and myself need to push back and slow things down a bit, and merge less during each cycle, especially if it is submitted later than about -rc3. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-11-11 9:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2013-11-11 10:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2013-11-11 11:25 ` Will Deacon 2013-11-19 9:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König 1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Will Deacon @ 2013-11-11 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 09:08:10AM +0000, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > Hello Will, > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 06:13:13PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > The following changes since commit 15c03dd4859ab16f9212238f29dd315654aa94f6: > > > > Linux 3.12-rc3 (2013-09-29 15:02:38 -0700) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git for-rmk/prefetch > > > > for you to fetch changes up to d779c07dd72098a7416d907494f958213b7726f3: > > > > ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex (2013-09-30 16:42:56 +0100) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Will Deacon (6): > > ARM: prefetch: remove redundant "cc" clobber > > ARM: smp_on_up: move inline asm ALT_SMP patching macro out of spinlock.h > > ARM: prefetch: add support for prefetchw using pldw on SMP ARMv7+ CPUs > > ARM: locks: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > > ARM: atomics: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > > ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > Hello Will, > > it seems the last patch breaks on efm32: > > arch/arm/lib/changebit.S: Assembler messages: > arch/arm/lib/changebit.S:15: Error: architectural extension `mp' is not allowed for the current base architecture I see gas is being as helpful as ever. Something like the (untested) patch below should fix the issue. Will --->8 diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h b/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h index e0c68d5bb7dc..52886b89706c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h +++ b/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ UNWIND( .fnstart ) and r3, r0, #31 @ Get bit offset mov r0, r0, lsr #5 add r1, r1, r0, lsl #2 @ Get word offset -#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 7 +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 7 && defined(CONFIG_SMP) .arch_extension mp ALT_SMP(W(pldw) [r1]) ALT_UP(W(nop)) ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-11-11 11:25 ` Will Deacon @ 2013-11-19 9:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2013-11-19 12:01 ` Will Deacon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2013-11-19 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:25:54AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 09:08:10AM +0000, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > Hello Will, > > > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 06:13:13PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > The following changes since commit 15c03dd4859ab16f9212238f29dd315654aa94f6: > > > > > > Linux 3.12-rc3 (2013-09-29 15:02:38 -0700) > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git for-rmk/prefetch > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to d779c07dd72098a7416d907494f958213b7726f3: > > > > > > ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex (2013-09-30 16:42:56 +0100) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Will Deacon (6): > > > ARM: prefetch: remove redundant "cc" clobber > > > ARM: smp_on_up: move inline asm ALT_SMP patching macro out of spinlock.h > > > ARM: prefetch: add support for prefetchw using pldw on SMP ARMv7+ CPUs > > > ARM: locks: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > > > ARM: atomics: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > > > ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > > Hello Will, > > > > it seems the last patch breaks on efm32: > > > > arch/arm/lib/changebit.S: Assembler messages: > > arch/arm/lib/changebit.S:15: Error: architectural extension `mp' is not allowed for the current base architecture > > I see gas is being as helpful as ever. Something like the (untested) patch > below should fix the issue. > > Will > > --->8 > > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h b/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h > index e0c68d5bb7dc..52886b89706c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h > +++ b/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ UNWIND( .fnstart ) > and r3, r0, #31 @ Get bit offset > mov r0, r0, lsr #5 > add r1, r1, r0, lsl #2 @ Get word offset > -#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 7 > +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 7 && defined(CONFIG_SMP) > .arch_extension mp > ALT_SMP(W(pldw) [r1]) > ALT_UP(W(nop)) > It does fix compilation and I booted successfully on my efm32-tree + next-20131119 + this patch + the patch for the be signal stuff. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-11-19 9:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König @ 2013-11-19 12:01 ` Will Deacon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Will Deacon @ 2013-11-19 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:27:41AM +0000, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:25:54AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > I see gas is being as helpful as ever. Something like the (untested) patch > > below should fix the issue. > > > > Will > > > > --->8 > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h b/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h > > index e0c68d5bb7dc..52886b89706c 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h > > +++ b/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h > > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ UNWIND( .fnstart ) > > and r3, r0, #31 @ Get bit offset > > mov r0, r0, lsr #5 > > add r1, r1, r0, lsl #2 @ Get word offset > > -#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 7 > > +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 7 && defined(CONFIG_SMP) > > .arch_extension mp > > ALT_SMP(W(pldw) [r1]) > > ALT_UP(W(nop)) > > > It does fix compilation and I booted successfully on my efm32-tree + > next-20131119 + this patch + the patch for the be signal stuff. Ok, great. Mind if I add your tested-by before I put it in the patch system? Cheers, Will ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-10-09 17:13 [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 Will Deacon 2013-10-30 15:24 ` Paul Walmsley 2013-11-11 9:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König @ 2013-11-24 9:54 ` Dirk Behme 2013-11-24 10:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Dirk Behme @ 2013-11-24 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Am 09.10.2013 19:13, schrieb Will Deacon: > Hi Russell, > > Please pull the following patches for 3.13. They add support for the pldw > instruction (prefetch with intent to modify) in ARMv7 SMP cores, which is > then used to gain a measurable performance boost for particular atomic > sequences. > > Cheers, > > Will > > --->8 > > The following changes since commit 15c03dd4859ab16f9212238f29dd315654aa94f6: > > Linux 3.12-rc3 (2013-09-29 15:02:38 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git for-rmk/prefetch > > for you to fetch changes up to d779c07dd72098a7416d907494f958213b7726f3: > > ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex (2013-09-30 16:42:56 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Will Deacon (6): > ARM: prefetch: remove redundant "cc" clobber > ARM: smp_on_up: move inline asm ALT_SMP patching macro out of spinlock.h > ARM: prefetch: add support for prefetchw using pldw on SMP ARMv7+ CPUs > ARM: locks: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > ARM: atomics: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > ARM: bitops: prefetch the destination word for write prior to strex > > arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h | 7 +++++++ > arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- > arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 2 +- > arch/arm/include/asm/unified.h | 4 ++++ > arch/arm/lib/bitops.h | 5 +++++ > 6 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) Would this patch series be a candidate for the -stable kernels as discussed recently in the "Patches from ARM folks solicited for the -stable tree" thread? Best regards Dirk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 2013-11-24 9:54 ` Dirk Behme @ 2013-11-24 10:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2013-11-24 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:54:07AM +0100, Dirk Behme wrote: > Would this patch series be a candidate for the -stable kernels as > discussed recently in the "Patches from ARM folks solicited for the > -stable tree" thread? I don't think so. Firstly, patches suitable for the stable tree are also suitable to be pushed in during -rc time. In other words, they're bug fixes and regression fixes. This is neither. Secondly, it has the effect that it raises the bar on the binutils to build the kernel, and if we push that into -stable kernels, those kernels will fail to build with older binutils - which is itself a regression as far as -stable is concerned. So no, I don't think it's appropriate. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-24 10:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-10-09 17:13 [GIT PULL] prefetch support for 3.13 Will Deacon 2013-10-30 15:24 ` Paul Walmsley 2013-10-30 15:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2013-10-30 15:32 ` Stephen Warren 2013-10-30 15:53 ` Paul Walmsley 2013-10-30 16:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2013-11-11 9:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2013-11-11 10:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2013-11-11 11:25 ` Will Deacon 2013-11-19 9:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2013-11-19 12:01 ` Will Deacon 2013-11-24 9:54 ` Dirk Behme 2013-11-24 10:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.