All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next] r8152: fix the wrong return value
@ 2014-01-03  3:21 Hayes Wang
  2014-01-03  5:38 ` David Cohen
  2014-01-04  1:37 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hayes Wang @ 2014-01-03  3:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-usb, Hayes Wang

The return value should be the boolean value, not the error code.

Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
Spotted-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
index e3d878c..13fabbb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
@@ -2708,7 +2708,7 @@ static bool rtl_ops_init(struct r8152 *tp, const struct usb_device_id *id)
 			ops->unload		= rtl8153_unload;
 			break;
 		default:
-			ret = -EFAULT;
+			ret = false;
 			break;
 		}
 		break;
-- 
1.8.4.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] r8152: fix the wrong return value
  2014-01-03  3:21 [PATCH net-next] r8152: fix the wrong return value Hayes Wang
@ 2014-01-03  5:38 ` David Cohen
  2014-01-04  1:37 ` David Miller
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Cohen @ 2014-01-03  5:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hayes Wang; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, linux-usb

On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 11:21:56AM +0800, Hayes Wang wrote:
> The return value should be the boolean value, not the error code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
> Spotted-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> index e3d878c..13fabbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> @@ -2708,7 +2708,7 @@ static bool rtl_ops_init(struct r8152 *tp, const struct usb_device_id *id)
>  			ops->unload		= rtl8153_unload;
>  			break;
>  		default:
> -			ret = -EFAULT;
> +			ret = false;

How about fix the function's return type instead?
Returning bool for success/error in Linux kernel is not natural. You
gotta check rtl_ops_init() for success and !rtl_ops_init() for error.
And you are unable to return the error value.

Br, David

>  			break;
>  		}
>  		break;
> -- 
> 1.8.4.2
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] r8152: fix the wrong return value
  2014-01-03  3:21 [PATCH net-next] r8152: fix the wrong return value Hayes Wang
  2014-01-03  5:38 ` David Cohen
@ 2014-01-04  1:37 ` David Miller
  2014-01-06  3:20   ` hayeswang
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2014-01-04  1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hayeswang; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, linux-usb

From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:21:56 +0800

> The return value should be the boolean value, not the error code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
> Spotted-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Applied, but I agree with others that it's more canonical to have the
function return either an error code, or zero for success, rather than
a boolean.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH net-next] r8152: fix the wrong return value
  2014-01-04  1:37 ` David Miller
@ 2014-01-06  3:20   ` hayeswang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: hayeswang @ 2014-01-06  3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'David Miller'; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, linux-usb

 David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net] 
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 9:38 AM
> To: Hayeswang
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 
> linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] r8152: fix the wrong return value
> 
> From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:21:56 +0800
> 
> > The return value should be the boolean value, not the error code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
> > Spotted-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> Applied, but I agree with others that it's more canonical to have the
> function return either an error code, or zero for success, rather than
> a boolean.

Thanks. I would find if there is suitable error code.
 
Best Regards,
Hayes


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-06  3:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-03  3:21 [PATCH net-next] r8152: fix the wrong return value Hayes Wang
2014-01-03  5:38 ` David Cohen
2014-01-04  1:37 ` David Miller
2014-01-06  3:20   ` hayeswang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.