* [PATCH] android/bluetooth: Fix discovering new devices
@ 2014-01-14 9:31 Szymon Janc
2014-01-14 11:39 ` Johan Hedberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Szymon Janc @ 2014-01-14 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bluetooth; +Cc: Szymon Janc
Device found events should be send also for known devices if this is
new discovery session. Otherwise Android will ignore those devices.
---
android/bluetooth.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/android/bluetooth.c b/android/bluetooth.c
index f1e5458..735b03e 100644
--- a/android/bluetooth.c
+++ b/android/bluetooth.c
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ struct device {
uint32_t timestamp;
GSList *uuids;
+
+ bool found; /* if device is found in current discovery session */
};
struct browse_req {
@@ -924,10 +926,19 @@ static void mgmt_discovering_event(uint16_t index, uint16_t length,
DBG("new discovering state %u", ev->discovering);
- if (adapter.discovering)
+ if (adapter.discovering) {
cp.state = HAL_DISCOVERY_STATE_STARTED;
- else
+ } else {
+ GSList *l;
+
+ for(l = devices; l; l = g_slist_next(l)) {
+ struct device *dev = l->data;
+
+ dev->found = false;
+ }
+
cp.state = HAL_DISCOVERY_STATE_STOPPED;
+ }
ipc_send_notif(HAL_SERVICE_ID_BLUETOOTH,
HAL_EV_DISCOVERY_STATE_CHANGED, sizeof(cp), &cp);
@@ -966,6 +977,17 @@ static uint8_t bdaddr_type2android(uint8_t type)
return HAL_TYPE_LE;
}
+static bool device_found_needed(struct device *dev)
+{
+ if (!dev)
+ return true;
+
+ if (dev->bond_state == HAL_BOND_STATE_BONDED)
+ return false;
+
+ return !dev->found;
+}
+
static void update_found_device(const bdaddr_t *bdaddr, uint8_t bdaddr_type,
int8_t rssi, bool confirm,
const uint8_t *data, uint8_t data_len)
@@ -983,12 +1005,15 @@ static void update_found_device(const bdaddr_t *bdaddr, uint8_t bdaddr_type,
eir_parse(&eir, data, data_len);
dev = find_device(bdaddr);
- if (!dev) {
+ if (device_found_needed(dev)) {
struct hal_ev_device_found *ev = (void *) buf;
bdaddr_t android_bdaddr;
uint8_t android_type;
- dev = create_device(bdaddr, bdaddr_type);
+ if (!dev)
+ dev = create_device(bdaddr, bdaddr_type);
+
+ dev->found = true;
size += sizeof(*ev);
--
1.8.3.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] android/bluetooth: Fix discovering new devices
2014-01-14 9:31 [PATCH] android/bluetooth: Fix discovering new devices Szymon Janc
@ 2014-01-14 11:39 ` Johan Hedberg
2014-01-16 10:22 ` Szymon Janc
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Johan Hedberg @ 2014-01-14 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Szymon Janc; +Cc: linux-bluetooth
Hi Szymon,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014, Szymon Janc wrote:
> + } else {
> + GSList *l;
> +
> + for(l = devices; l; l = g_slist_next(l)) {
Coding style thing here (space after 'for'). You might wanna consider a
helper function and g_slist_foreach here tough.
> +static bool device_found_needed(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + if (!dev)
> + return true;
> +
> + if (dev->bond_state == HAL_BOND_STATE_BONDED)
> + return false;
> +
> + return !dev->found;
> +}
I think you should provide lots more code comments here with proper
explanations of each if-statement. E.g. your commit message doesn't
mention anything about bonded devices and yet you have a check for this
state here.
Johan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] android/bluetooth: Fix discovering new devices
2014-01-14 11:39 ` Johan Hedberg
@ 2014-01-16 10:22 ` Szymon Janc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Szymon Janc @ 2014-01-16 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johan Hedberg; +Cc: linux-bluetooth
Hi Johan,
On Tuesday 14 of January 2014 13:39:20 Johan Hedberg wrote:
> Hi Szymon,
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014, Szymon Janc wrote:
> > + } else {
> > + GSList *l;
> > +
> > + for(l = devices; l; l = g_slist_next(l)) {
>
> Coding style thing here (space after 'for'). You might wanna consider a
> helper function and g_slist_foreach here tough.
>
> > +static bool device_found_needed(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + if (!dev)
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + if (dev->bond_state == HAL_BOND_STATE_BONDED)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return !dev->found;
> > +}
>
> I think you should provide lots more code comments here with proper
> explanations of each if-statement. E.g. your commit message doesn't
> mention anything about bonded devices and yet you have a check for this
> state here.
Now I think this check is not really needed, if paired remote is responding to
inquiry then just notify HAL as with any other device found.
I'll send V2 shortly.
--
Best regards,
Szymon Janc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-16 10:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-14 9:31 [PATCH] android/bluetooth: Fix discovering new devices Szymon Janc
2014-01-14 11:39 ` Johan Hedberg
2014-01-16 10:22 ` Szymon Janc
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.